IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2208.14164.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A fundamental Game Theoretic model and approximate global Nash Equilibria computation for European Spot Power Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Ioan Alexandru Puiu
  • Raphael Andreas Hauser

Abstract

Spot electricity markets are considered under a Game-Theoretic framework, where risk averse players submit orders to the market clearing mechanism to maximise their own utility. Consistent with the current practice in Europe, the market clearing mechanism is modelled as a Social Welfare Maximisation problem, with zonal pricing, and we consider inflexible demand, physical constraints of the electricity grid, and capacity-constrained producers. A novel type of non-parametric risk aversion based on a defined worst case scenario is introduced, and this reduces the dimensionality of the strategy variables and ensures boundedness of prices. By leveraging these properties we devise Jacobi and Gauss-Seidel iterative schemes for computation of approximate global Nash Equilibria, which are in contrast to derivative based local equilibria. Our methodology is applied to the real world data of Central Western European (CWE) Spot Market during the 2019-2020 period, and offers a good representation of the historical time series of prices. By also solving for the assumption of truthful bidding, we devise a simple method based on hypothesis testing to infer if and when producers are bidding strategically (instead of truthfully), and we find evidence suggesting that strategic bidding may be fairly pronounced in the CWE region.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioan Alexandru Puiu & Raphael Andreas Hauser, 2022. "A fundamental Game Theoretic model and approximate global Nash Equilibria computation for European Spot Power Markets," Papers 2208.14164, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2208.14164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2208.14164
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven A. Gabriel & Antonio J. Conejo & J. David Fuller & Benjamin F. Hobbs & Carlos Ruiz, 2013. "Complementarity Modeling in Energy Markets," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 127, number 978-1-4419-6123-5, March.
    2. O'Neill, Richard P. & Sotkiewicz, Paul M. & Hobbs, Benjamin F. & Rothkopf, Michael H. & Stewart, William R., 2005. "Efficient market-clearing prices in markets with nonconvexities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(1), pages 269-285, July.
    3. Robert Wilson, 2002. "Architecture of Power Markets," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 1299-1340, July.
    4. Xinmin Hu & Daniel Ralph, 2007. "Using EPECs to Model Bilevel Games in Restructured Electricity Markets with Locational Prices," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(5), pages 809-827, October.
    5. Myerson, Roger B. & Satterthwaite, Mark A., 1983. "Efficient mechanisms for bilateral trading," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 265-281, April.
    6. Klemperer, Paul D & Meyer, Margaret A, 1989. "Supply Function Equilibria in Oligopoly under Uncertainty," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(6), pages 1243-1277, November.
    7. Ioan Alexandru Puiu & Raphael Andreas Hauser, 2022. "On Market Clearing of Day Ahead Auctions for European Power Markets: Cost Minimisation versus Social Welfare Maximisation," Papers 2207.06396, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elisabetta Allevi & Didier Aussel & Rossana Riccardi, 2018. "On an equilibrium problem with complementarity constraints formulation of pay-as-clear electricity market with demand elasticity," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 70(2), pages 329-346, February.
    2. Ioan Alexandru Puiu & Raphael Andreas Hauser, 2022. "On Market Clearing of Day Ahead Auctions for European Power Markets: Cost Minimisation versus Social Welfare Maximisation," Papers 2207.06396, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    3. Pérez de Arce, Miguel & Sauma, Enzo & Contreras, Javier, 2016. "Renewable energy policy performance in reducing CO2 emissions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 272-280.
    4. Juan Escobar & Alejandro Jofré, 2010. "Monopolistic competition in electricity networks with resistance losses," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 44(1), pages 101-121, July.
    5. Christos N. Dimitriadis & Evangelos G. Tsimopoulos & Michael C. Georgiadis, 2021. "A Review on the Complementarity Modelling in Competitive Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, November.
    6. Pär Holmberg & Andy Philpott, 2014. "Supply function equilibria in transportation networks," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1421, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    7. Hyoduk Shin & Tunay I. Tunca, 2010. "Do Firms Invest in Forecasting Efficiently? The Effect of Competition on Demand Forecast Investments and Supply Chain Coordination," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(6), pages 1592-1610, December.
    8. Hassan Shavandi & Mehrdad Pirnia & J. David Fuller, 2018. "Extended opportunity cost model to find near equilibrium electricity prices under non-convexities," Papers 1809.09734, arXiv.org.
    9. Dzikri Firmansyah Hakam, 2018. "Market Power Modelling in Electricity Market: A Critical Review," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 8(5), pages 347-356.
    10. Philipsen, Rens & Morales-España, Germán & de Weerdt, Mathijs & de Vries, Laurens, 2019. "Trading power instead of energy in day-ahead electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 802-815.
    11. Wang, Lu & Gu, Wei & Wu, Zhi & Qiu, Haifeng & Pan, Guangsheng, 2020. "Non-cooperative game-based multilateral contract transactions in power-heating integrated systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    12. Samuel Antill & Darrell Duffie, 2021. "Augmenting Markets with Mechanisms [Optimal Execution of Portfolio Transactions]," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 88(4), pages 1665-1719.
    13. Paul Klemperer, 2002. "What Really Matters in Auction Design," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 16(1), pages 169-189, Winter.
    14. Hunt Allcott, 2012. "The Smart Grid, Entry, and Imperfect Competition in Electricity Markets," NBER Working Papers 18071, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Tunay I. Tunca, 2004. "Information Precision and Asymptotic Efficiency of Industrial Markets," Working Papers 04-11, NET Institute, revised Oct 2004.
    16. Varawala, Lamia & Hesamzadeh, Mohammad Reza & Dán, György & Bunn, Derek & Rosellón, Juan, 2023. "A pricing mechanism to jointly mitigate market power and environmental externalities in electricity markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    17. Holmberg, Pär & Philpott, Andrew, 2012. "Supply Function Equilibria in Networks with Transport Constraints," Working Paper Series 945, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised 10 Aug 2015.
    18. E. Anderson & A. Philpott & H. Xu, 2007. "Modelling the effects of interconnection between electricity markets subject to uncertainty," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 65(1), pages 1-26, February.
    19. Committee, Nobel Prize, 2020. "Improvements to auction theory and inventions of new auction formats," Nobel Prize in Economics documents 2020-2, Nobel Prize Committee.
    20. Boom, Anette, 2009. "Vertically integrated firms' investments in electricity generating capacities," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 544-551, July.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2208.14164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.