IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2205.11012.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Parameters identification for an inverse problem arising from a binary option using a Bayesian inference approach

Author

Listed:
  • Yasushi Ota
  • Yu Jiang
  • Daiki Maki

Abstract

No--arbitrage property provides a simple method for pricing financial derivatives. However, arbitrage opportunities exist among different markets in various fields, even for a very short time. By knowing that an arbitrage property exists, we can adopt a financial trading strategy. This paper investigates the inverse option problems (IOP) in the extended Black--Scholes model. We identify the model coefficients from the measured data and attempt to find arbitrage opportunities in different financial markets using a Bayesian inference approach, which is presented as an IOP solution. The posterior probability density function of the parameters is computed from the measured data.The statistics of the unknown parameters are estimated by a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm, which exploits the posterior state space. The efficient sampling strategy of the MCMC algorithm enables us to solve inverse problems by the Bayesian inference technique. Our numerical results indicate that the Bayesian inference approach can simultaneously estimate the unknown trend and volatility coefficients from the measured data.

Suggested Citation

  • Yasushi Ota & Yu Jiang & Daiki Maki, 2022. "Parameters identification for an inverse problem arising from a binary option using a Bayesian inference approach," Papers 2205.11012, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2205.11012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.11012
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ilia Bouchouev & Victor Isakov & Nicolas Valdivia, 2002. "Recovery of volatility coefficient by linearization," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(4), pages 257-263.
    2. Jacquier, Eric & Jarrow, Robert, 2000. "Bayesian analysis of contingent claim model error," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 94(1-2), pages 145-180.
    3. Radu Tunaru, 2015. "Model Risk in Financial Markets:From Financial Engineering to Risk Management," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 9524, December.
    4. Black, Fischer & Scholes, Myron S, 1973. "The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 81(3), pages 637-654, May-June.
    5. Tunaru, Radu & Zheng, Teng, 2017. "Parameter estimation risk in asset pricing and risk management: A Bayesian approach," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 80-93.
    6. H. Haario & M. Laine & M. Lehtinen & E. Saksman & J. Tamminen, 2004. "Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for high dimensional inversion in remote sensing," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(3), pages 591-607, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lazar, Emese & Qi, Shuyuan, 2022. "Model risk in the over-the-counter market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(2), pages 769-784.
    2. Alexander David & Pietro Veronesi, 1998. "Option Prices with Uncertain Fundamentals: Theory and Evidence on the Dynamics of Implied Volatilities," CRSP working papers 485, Center for Research in Security Prices, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago.
    3. G. C. Lim & G. M. Martin & V. L. Martin, 2005. "Parametric pricing of higher order moments in S&P500 options," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(3), pages 377-404, March.
    4. Lin, Lisha & Li, Yaqiong & Gao, Rui & Wu, Jianhong, 2021. "The numerical simulation of Quanto option prices using Bayesian statistical methods," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 567(C).
    5. Gael M. Martin & Catherine S. Forbes & Vance L. Martin, 2005. "Implicit Bayesian Inference Using Option Prices," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 437-462, May.
    6. Rombouts, Jeroen V.K. & Stentoft, Lars, 2014. "Bayesian option pricing using mixed normal heteroskedasticity models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 588-605.
    7. Gao, Rui & Li, Yaqiong & Lin, Lisha, 2019. "Bayesian statistical inference for European options with stock liquidity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 518(C), pages 312-322.
    8. Catherine S. Forbes & Gael M. Martin & Jill Wright, 2007. "Inference for a Class of Stochastic Volatility Models Using Option and Spot Prices: Application of a Bivariate Kalman Filter," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2-4), pages 387-418.
    9. Lisha Lin & Yaqiong Li & Rui Gao & Jianhong Wu, 2019. "The Numerical Simulation of Quanto Option Prices Using Bayesian Statistical Methods," Papers 1910.04075, arXiv.org.
    10. Samuel N. Cohen & Martin Tegn'er, 2018. "European Option Pricing with Stochastic Volatility models under Parameter Uncertainty," Papers 1807.03882, arXiv.org.
    11. Nikkinen, Jussi, 2003. "Normality tests of option-implied risk-neutral densities: evidence from the small Finnish market," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 99-116.
    12. Cheng, Ai-ru (Meg) & Gallant, A. Ronald & Ji, Chuanshu & Lee, Beom S., 2008. "A Gaussian approximation scheme for computation of option prices in stochastic volatility models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 44-58, September.
    13. Y. Esmaeelzade Aghdam & H. Mesgarani & A. Amin & J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, 2024. "An Efficient Numerical Scheme to Approach the Time Fractional Black–Scholes Model Using Orthogonal Gegenbauer Polynomials," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(1), pages 211-224, July.
    14. Christoffersen, Peter & Jacobs, Kris, 2004. "The importance of the loss function in option valuation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 291-318, May.
    15. Moritz Duembgen & L. C. G. Rogers, 2014. "Estimate nothing," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(12), pages 2065-2072, December.
    16. Gurupdesh S. Pandher, 2007. "Regression-based modeling of market option prices: with application to S&P500 options," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(7), pages 475-496.
    17. Mrázek, Milan & Pospíšil, Jan & Sobotka, Tomáš, 2016. "On calibration of stochastic and fractional stochastic volatility models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(3), pages 1036-1046.
    18. Mariano González-Sánchez & Eva M. Ibáñez Jiménez & Ana I. Segovia San Juan, 2022. "Market and model risks: a feasible joint estimate methodology," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(3), pages 187-213, September.
    19. Chung, Huimin & Lee, Chin-Shen & Wu, Soushan, 2002. "The effects of model errors and market imperfections on financial institutions writing derivative warrants: Simulation evidence from Taiwan," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 55-75, January.
    20. Ben Abdallah, Skander & Lasserre, Pierre, 2016. "Asset retirement with infinitely repeated alternative replacements: Harvest age and species choice in forestry," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 144-164.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2205.11012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.