IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2111.05935.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Meta-Method for Portfolio Management Using Machine Learning for Adaptive Strategy Selection

Author

Listed:
  • Damian Kisiel
  • Denise Gorse

Abstract

This work proposes a novel portfolio management technique, the Meta Portfolio Method (MPM), inspired by the successes of meta approaches in the field of bioinformatics and elsewhere. The MPM uses XGBoost to learn how to switch between two risk-based portfolio allocation strategies, the Hierarchical Risk Parity (HRP) and more classical Na\"ive Risk Parity (NRP). It is demonstrated that the MPM is able to successfully take advantage of the best characteristics of each strategy (the NRP's fast growth during market uptrends, and the HRP's protection against drawdowns during market turmoil). As a result, the MPM is shown to possess an excellent out-of-sample risk-reward profile, as measured by the Sharpe ratio, and in addition offers a high degree of interpretability of its asset allocation decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Damian Kisiel & Denise Gorse, 2021. "A Meta-Method for Portfolio Management Using Machine Learning for Adaptive Strategy Selection," Papers 2111.05935, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2111.05935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2111.05935
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marwan Izzeldin & M. Kabir Hassan & Vasileios Pappas & Mike Tsionas, 2019. "Forecasting realised volatility using ARFIMA and HAR models," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(10), pages 1627-1638, October.
    2. Roncalli, Thierry, 2013. "Introduction to Risk Parity and Budgeting," MPRA Paper 47679, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4688 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Alexei Chekhlov & Stanislav Uryasev & Michael Zabarankin, 2005. "Drawdown Measure In Portfolio Optimization," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(01), pages 13-58.
    5. Maarten Meeuwis & Jonathan A. Parker & Antoinette Schoar & Duncan Simester, 2022. "Belief Disagreement and Portfolio Choice," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 77(6), pages 3191-3247, December.
    6. Ulf, Herold & Raimond, Maurer, 2006. "Portfolio Choice and Estimation Risk. A Comparison of Bayesian to Heuristic Approaches," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(1), pages 135-160, May.
    7. Ulf Herold & Raimond Maurer, 2006. "Portfolio Choice and Estimation Risk: A Comparison of Bayesian to Heuristic Approaches," Working Paper Series: Finance and Accounting 94, Department of Finance, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main.
    8. Trinks, Arjan & Scholtens, Bert & Mulder, Machiel & Dam, Lammertjan, 2018. "Fossil Fuel Divestment and Portfolio Performance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 740-748.
    9. Bin Li & Jialei Wang & Dingjiang Huang & Steven C. H. Hoi, 2018. "Transaction cost optimization for online portfolio selection," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(8), pages 1411-1424, August.
    10. Gah-Yi Ban & Noureddine El Karoui & Andrew E. B. Lim, 2018. "Machine Learning and Portfolio Optimization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(3), pages 1136-1154, March.
    11. Jang Ho Kim & Woo Chang Kim & Do-Gyun Kwon & Frank J. Fabozzi, 2018. "Robust equity portfolio performance," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 266(1), pages 293-312, July.
    12. Engle, Robert, 2002. "Dynamic Conditional Correlation: A Simple Class of Multivariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity Models," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 20(3), pages 339-350, July.
    13. Dariush Najarzadeh, 2019. "Testing equality of standardized generalized variances of k multivariate normal populations with arbitrary dimensions," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(4), pages 593-623, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Damian Kisiel & Denise Gorse, 2022. "Portfolio Transformer for Attention-Based Asset Allocation," Papers 2206.03246, arXiv.org.
    2. Damian Kisiel & Denise Gorse, 2022. "Axial-LOB: High-Frequency Trading with Axial Attention," Papers 2212.01807, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gilles Boevi Koumou, 2020. "Diversification and portfolio theory: a review," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 34(3), pages 267-312, September.
    2. Harris, Richard D.F. & Mazibas, Murat, 2013. "Dynamic hedge fund portfolio construction: A semi-parametric approach," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 139-149.
    3. da Costa, B. Freitas Paulo & Pesenti, Silvana M. & Targino, Rodrigo S., 2023. "Risk budgeting portfolios from simulations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(3), pages 1040-1056.
    4. Wang, Yuanrong & Aste, Tomaso, 2023. "Dynamic portfolio optimization with inverse covariance clustering," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117701, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Sun, Chuting & Wu, Qi & Yan, Xing, 2024. "Dynamic CVaR portfolio construction with attention-powered generative factor learning," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    6. Ni, Xuanming & Zheng, Tiantian & Zhao, Huimin & Zhu, Shushang, 2023. "High-dimensional portfolio optimization based on tree-structured factor model," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    7. Allen, David & Lizieri, Colin & Satchell, Stephen, 2020. "A comparison of non-Gaussian VaR estimation and portfolio construction techniques," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 356-368.
    8. Olessia Caillé & Daria Onori, 2019. "Conditional Risk-Based Portfolio," Finance, Presses universitaires de Grenoble, vol. 40(2), pages 77-117.
    9. Andrés García-Medina & Ester Aguayo-Moreno, 2024. "LSTM–GARCH Hybrid Model for the Prediction of Volatility in Cryptocurrency Portfolios," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(4), pages 1511-1542, April.
    10. Timo Dimitriadis & Yannick Hoga, 2023. "Regressions under Adverse Conditions," Papers 2311.13327, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2024.
    11. Chuting Sun & Qi Wu & Xing Yan, 2023. "Dynamic CVaR Portfolio Construction with Attention-Powered Generative Factor Learning," Papers 2301.07318, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    12. Yuanrong Wang & Tomaso Aste, 2021. "Dynamic Portfolio Optimization with Inverse Covariance Clustering," Papers 2112.15499, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    13. Han, Chulwoo & Park, Frank C., 2022. "A geometric framework for covariance dynamics," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    14. Chunhachinda, Pornchai & de Boyrie, Maria E. & Pavlova, Ivelina, 2019. "Measuring the hedging effectiveness of commodities," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 201-207.
    15. Antonio Rubia & Trino-Manuel Ñíguez, 2006. "Forecasting the conditional covariance matrix of a portfolio under long-run temporal dependence," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(6), pages 439-458.
    16. Cavit Pakel & Neil Shephard & Kevin Sheppard, 2009. "Nuisance parameters, composite likelihoods and a panel of GARCH models," Economics Papers 2009-W12, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    17. Gerardo Manzo & Antonio Picca, 2020. "The Impact of Sovereign Shocks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(7), pages 3113-3132, July.
    18. Asai Manabu & So Mike K.P., 2015. "Long Memory and Asymmetry for Matrix-Exponential Dynamic Correlation Processes," Journal of Time Series Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 69-94, January.
    19. Hong, Claire Yurong & Lu, Xiaomeng & Pan, Jun, 2021. "FinTech adoption and household risk-taking," BOFIT Discussion Papers 14/2021, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    20. Sensoy, Ahmet & Sobaci, Cihat, 2014. "Effects of volatility shocks on the dynamic linkages between exchange rate, interest rate and the stock market: The case of Turkey," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 448-457.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2111.05935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.