IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2012.15035.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Measuring Human Adaptation to AI in Decision Making: Application to Evaluate Changes after AlphaGo

Author

Listed:
  • Minkyu Shin
  • Jin Kim
  • Minkyung Kim

Abstract

Across a growing number of domains, human experts are expected to learn from and adapt to AI with superior decision making abilities. But how can we quantify such human adaptation to AI? We develop a simple measure of human adaptation to AI and test its usefulness in two case studies. In Study 1, we analyze 1.3 million move decisions made by professional Go players and find that a positive form of adaptation to AI (learning) occurred after the players could observe the reasoning processes of AI, rather than mere actions of AI. These findings based on our measure highlight the importance of explainability for human learning from AI. In Study 2, we test whether our measure is sufficiently sensitive to capture a negative form of adaptation to AI (cheating aided by AI), which occurred in a match between professional Go players. We discuss our measure's applications in domains other than Go, especially in domains in which AI's decision making ability will likely surpass that of human experts.

Suggested Citation

  • Minkyu Shin & Jin Kim & Minkyung Kim, 2020. "Measuring Human Adaptation to AI in Decision Making: Application to Evaluate Changes after AlphaGo," Papers 2012.15035, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2021.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2012.15035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2012.15035
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anthony Strittmatter & Uwe Sunde & Dainis Zegners, 2020. "Life cycle patterns of cognitive performance over the long run," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(44), pages 27255-27261, November.
    2. Pascale Waelti & Anthony Dickinson & Wolfram Schultz, 2001. "Dopamine responses comply with basic assumptions of formal learning theory," Nature, Nature, vol. 412(6842), pages 43-48, July.
    3. David Silver & Julian Schrittwieser & Karen Simonyan & Ioannis Antonoglou & Aja Huang & Arthur Guez & Thomas Hubert & Lucas Baker & Matthew Lai & Adrian Bolton & Yutian Chen & Timothy Lillicrap & Fan , 2017. "Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge," Nature, Nature, vol. 550(7676), pages 354-359, October.
    4. Mitsuru Igami, 0. "Artificial intelligence as structural estimation: Deep Blue, Bonanza, and AlphaGo," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 23(3), pages 1-24.
    5. Will Dabney & Zeb Kurth-Nelson & Naoshige Uchida & Clara Kwon Starkweather & Demis Hassabis & Rémi Munos & Matthew Botvinick, 2020. "A distributional code for value in dopamine-based reinforcement learning," Nature, Nature, vol. 577(7792), pages 671-675, January.
    6. John Rust, 2019. "Has Dynamic Programming Improved Decision Making?," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 833-858, August.
    7. Mitsuru Igami, 2020. "Artificial intelligence as structural estimation: Deep Blue, Bonanza, and AlphaGo," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 23(3), pages 1-24.
    8. David Silver & Aja Huang & Chris J. Maddison & Arthur Guez & Laurent Sifre & George van den Driessche & Julian Schrittwieser & Ioannis Antonoglou & Veda Panneershelvam & Marc Lanctot & Sander Dieleman, 2016. "Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search," Nature, Nature, vol. 529(7587), pages 484-489, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pedro Afonso Fernandes, 2024. "Forecasting with Neuro-Dynamic Programming," Papers 2404.03737, arXiv.org.
    2. Yuchen Zhang & Wei Yang, 2022. "Breakthrough invention and problem complexity: Evidence from a quasi‐experiment," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(12), pages 2510-2544, December.
    3. Omar Al-Ani & Sanjoy Das, 2022. "Reinforcement Learning: Theory and Applications in HEMS," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-37, September.
    4. Zhang, Yihao & Chai, Zhaojie & Lykotrafitis, George, 2021. "Deep reinforcement learning with a particle dynamics environment applied to emergency evacuation of a room with obstacles," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 571(C).
    5. Jun Li & Wei Zhu & Jun Wang & Wenfei Li & Sheng Gong & Jian Zhang & Wei Wang, 2018. "RNA3DCNN: Local and global quality assessments of RNA 3D structures using 3D deep convolutional neural networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Keller, Alexander & Dahm, Ken, 2019. "Integral equations and machine learning," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 2-12.
    7. Haoran Wang & Shi Yu, 2021. "Robo-Advising: Enhancing Investment with Inverse Optimization and Deep Reinforcement Learning," Papers 2105.09264, arXiv.org.
    8. Weifan Long & Taixian Hou & Xiaoyi Wei & Shichao Yan & Peng Zhai & Lihua Zhang, 2023. "A Survey on Population-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, May.
    9. Yifeng Guo & Xingyu Fu & Yuyan Shi & Mingwen Liu, 2018. "Robust Log-Optimal Strategy with Reinforcement Learning," Papers 1805.00205, arXiv.org.
    10. Xueqing Yan & Yongming Li, 2023. "A Novel Discrete Differential Evolution with Varying Variables for the Deficiency Number of Mahjong Hand," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, May.
    11. Pujin Wang & Jianzhuang Xiao & Ken’ichi Kawaguchi & Lichen Wang, 2022. "Automatic Ceiling Damage Detection in Large-Span Structures Based on Computer Vision and Deep Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    12. Jianjun Chen & Weihao Hu & Di Cao & Bin Zhang & Qi Huang & Zhe Chen & Frede Blaabjerg, 2019. "An Imbalance Fault Detection Algorithm for Variable-Speed Wind Turbines: A Deep Learning Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-15, July.
    13. Pablo S. Castro & Ajit Desai & Han Du & Rodney Garratt & Francisco Rivadeneyra, 2021. "Estimating Policy Functions in Payments Systems Using Reinforcement Learning," Staff Working Papers 21-7, Bank of Canada.
    14. Hui Chen & Antoine Didisheim & Simon Scheidegger, 2021. "Deep Structural Estimation:With an Application to Option Pricing," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 21.14, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
    15. Lu Wang & Wenqing Ai & Tianhu Deng & Zuo‐Jun M. Shen & Changjing Hong, 2020. "Optimal production ramp‐up in the smartphone manufacturing industry," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(8), pages 685-704, December.
    16. Yuchao Dong, 2022. "Randomized Optimal Stopping Problem in Continuous time and Reinforcement Learning Algorithm," Papers 2208.02409, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.
    17. Shijun Wang & Baocheng Zhu & Chen Li & Mingzhe Wu & James Zhang & Wei Chu & Yuan Qi, 2020. "Riemannian Proximal Policy Optimization," Computer and Information Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(3), pages 1-93, August.
    18. Dainis Zegners & Uwe Sunde & Anthony Strittmatter, 2020. "Decisions and Performance Under Bounded Rationality: A Computational Benchmarking Approach," CESifo Working Paper Series 8341, CESifo.
    19. Morato, P.G. & Andriotis, C.P. & Papakonstantinou, K.G. & Rigo, P., 2023. "Inference and dynamic decision-making for deteriorating systems with probabilistic dependencies through Bayesian networks and deep reinforcement learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    20. Yi Cheng & Chuzhi Zhao & Pradeep Neupane & Bradley Benjamin & Jiawei Wang & Tongsheng Zhang, 2023. "Applicability and Trend of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Bioenergy Research between 1991–2021: A Bibliometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2012.15035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.