IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v412y2001i6842d10.1038_35083500.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dopamine responses comply with basic assumptions of formal learning theory

Author

Listed:
  • Pascale Waelti

    (Institute of Physiology and Programme in Neuroscience, University of Fribourg)

  • Anthony Dickinson

    (University of Cambridge)

  • Wolfram Schultz

    (Institute of Physiology and Programme in Neuroscience, University of Fribourg)

Abstract

According to contemporary learning theories, the discrepancy, or error, between the actual and predicted reward determines whether learning occurs when a stimulus is paired with a reward. The role of prediction errors is directly demonstrated by the observation that learning is blocked when the stimulus is paired with a fully predicted reward. By using this blocking procedure, we show that the responses of dopamine neurons to conditioned stimuli was governed differentially by the occurrence of reward prediction errors rather than stimulus–reward associations alone, as was the learning of behavioural reactions. Both behavioural and neuronal learning occurred predominantly when dopamine neurons registered a reward prediction error at the time of the reward. Our data indicate that the use of analytical tests derived from formal behavioural learning theory provides a powerful approach for studying the role of single neurons in learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Pascale Waelti & Anthony Dickinson & Wolfram Schultz, 2001. "Dopamine responses comply with basic assumptions of formal learning theory," Nature, Nature, vol. 412(6842), pages 43-48, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:412:y:2001:i:6842:d:10.1038_35083500
    DOI: 10.1038/35083500
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/35083500
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/35083500?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Linan Diao & Jörg Rieskamp, 2011. "Reinforcement Learning in Repeated Portfolio Decisions," Jena Economics Research Papers 2011-009, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    2. Smith, Trenton G., 2023. "Endocrine state is the physical manifestation of subjective beliefs," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    3. Newman, Andrew H. & Tafkov, Ivo D. & Waddoups, Nathan J. & Xiong, Xiaomei Grazia, 2024. "The effect of reward frequency on performance under cash rewards and tangible rewards," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    4. Smith, Trenton G. & Tasnadi, Attila, 2007. "A theory of natural addiction," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 316-344, May.
    5. Zhewei Zhang & Yuji K. Takahashi & Marlian Montesinos-Cartegena & Thorsten Kahnt & Angela J. Langdon & Geoffrey Schoenbaum, 2024. "Expectancy-related changes in firing of dopamine neurons depend on hippocampus," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Burkhard Pleger & Christian C Ruff & Felix Blankenburg & Stefan Klöppel & Jon Driver & Raymond J Dolan, 2009. "Influence of Dopaminergically Mediated Reward on Somatosensory Decision-Making," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(7), pages 1-10, July.
    7. Minkyu Shin & Jin Kim & Minkyung Kim, 2020. "Measuring Human Adaptation to AI in Decision Making: Application to Evaluate Changes after AlphaGo," Papers 2012.15035, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2021.
    8. Greg Jensen & Fabian Muñoz & Yelda Alkan & Vincent P Ferrera & Herbert S Terrace, 2015. "Implicit Value Updating Explains Transitive Inference Performance: The Betasort Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-27, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:412:y:2001:i:6842:d:10.1038_35083500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.