IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2007.11877.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Proposal for a Comprehensive (Crypto) Asset Taxonomy

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Ankenbrand
  • Denis Bieri
  • Roland Cortivo
  • Johannes Hoehener
  • Thomas Hardjono

Abstract

Developments in the distributed ledger technology have led to new types of assets with a broad range of purposes. Although some classification frameworks for common instruments from traditional finance and some for these new, so called cryptographic assets already exist and are used, a holistic approach to integrate both worlds is missing. The present paper fills this research gap by identifying 14 attributes, each of which is assigned different characteristics, that can be used to classify all types of assets in a structured manner. Our proposed taxonomy which is an extension of existing classification frameworks, summarises these findings in a morphological box and is tested for practicability by classifying exemplary assets like cash and bitcoin. The final classification framework can help to ensure that the various stakeholders, such as investors or supervisors, have a consistent view of the different types of assets, and in particular of their characteristics, and also helps to establish standardised terminology.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Ankenbrand & Denis Bieri & Roland Cortivo & Johannes Hoehener & Thomas Hardjono, 2020. "Proposal for a Comprehensive (Crypto) Asset Taxonomy," Papers 2007.11877, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2007.11877
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.11877
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Apolline Blandin & Ann Sofie Cloots & Hatim Hussain & Michel Rauchs & Rasheed Saleuddin & Jason Grant Allen & Katherine Cloud & Bryan Zheng Zhang, 2019. "Global Cryptoasset Regulatory Landscape Study," Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance Reports -201904-gcrls, Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raphael Auer & Bernhard Haslhofer & Stefan Kitzler & Pietro Saggese & Friedhelm Victor, 2024. "The technology of decentralized finance (DeFi)," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 55-95, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Allen, Darcy W.E. & Berg, Chris & Markey-Towler, Brendan & Novak, Mikayla & Potts, Jason, 2020. "Blockchain and the evolution of institutional technologies: Implications for innovation policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    2. Gonzálvez-Gallego, Nicolás & Pérez-Cárceles, María Concepción, 2021. "Cryptocurrencies and illicit practices: The role of governance," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 203-212.
    3. Liebi, Luca J., 2022. "Is there a value premium in cryptoasset markets?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    4. Lo, Yuen & Medda, Francesca, 2020. "Uniswap and the rise of the decentralized exchange," MPRA Paper 103925, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Bongini, Paola & Osborne, Francesco & Pedrazzoli, Alessia & Rossolini, Monica, 2022. "A topic modelling analysis of white papers in security token offerings: Which topic matters for funding?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    6. Xinwen Ni & Wolfgang Karl Hardle & Taojun Xie, 2020. "A Machine Learning Based Regulatory Risk Index for Cryptocurrencies," Papers 2009.12121, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    7. Christoph Wronka, 2024. "Crypto-asset regulatory landscape: a comparative analysis of the crypto-asset regulation in the UK and Germany," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(4), pages 417-426, July.
    8. Ali Sunyaev & Niclas Kannengießer & Roman Beck & Horst Treiblmaier & Mary Lacity & Johann Kranz & Gilbert Fridgen & Ulli Spankowski & André Luckow, 2021. "Token Economy," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(4), pages 457-478, August.
    9. Lin William Cong & Xi Li & Ke Tang & Yang Yang, 2023. "Crypto Wash Trading," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(11), pages 6427-6454, November.
    10. Zhang, Jiahang & Zhang, Chi, 2022. "Do cryptocurrency markets react to issuer sentiments? Evidence from Twitter," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    11. Giancarlo Giudici & Alistair Milne & Dmitri Vinogradov, 2020. "Cryptocurrencies: market analysis and perspectives," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 47(1), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Thomas Lambert & Daniel Liebau & Peter Roosenboom, 2022. "Security token offerings," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 299-325, June.
    13. Ni, Xinwen & Härdle, Wolfgang Karl & Xie, Taojun, 2020. "A Machine Learning Based Regulatory Risk Index for Cryptocurrencies," IRTG 1792 Discussion Papers 2020-013, Humboldt University of Berlin, International Research Training Group 1792 "High Dimensional Nonstationary Time Series".
    14. Simon Butler, 2019. "Criminal use of cryptocurrencies: a great new threat or is cash still king?," Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 326-345, September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2007.11877. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.