IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jfinte/v2y2023i3p31-559d1218817.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recognition and Measurement of Crypto-Assets from the Perspective of Retail Holders

Author

Listed:
  • Voicu D. Dragomir

    (Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 6 Piața Romană, 1st District, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Valentin Florentin Dumitru

    (Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 6 Piața Romană, 1st District, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCa) Regulation of the European Union is the first comprehensive piece of legislation that seeks to protect the interests of investors in the crypto-assets sector. Although the market value of crypto-assets is significant at world level, there is a lack of clear regulatory guidelines regarding the recognition, measurement, and presentation of crypto-assets in the financial statements of investors. Considering that not all digital assets are the same, retail holders need to take into account the characteristics, rights, and obligations associated with the crypto-assets they purchase to determine the appropriate accounting method. Therefore, the research question of the present article is: Which are the main types of crypto-assets and how should they be recognized and measured in the financial statements of investors and holders? We perform a review of the accounting policies and options, relying on relevant regulations, standards, regulatory drafts, legal and academic papers, recommendations of market regulators, crypto-asset white papers, industry opinions, and media articles. There are different accounting treatments that can be applied, depending on the legal and technological aspects of each class of crypto-assets. Based on a critical discussion of accounting policies and options, our research has implications for accounting professionals, but also for standard setters, who are urged to provide clear guidelines. Identifying the key economic characteristics of each asset and determining the most appropriate way to recognize these characteristics in the financial statements are crucial for the development of a functional and trustworthy market in crypto-assets.

Suggested Citation

  • Voicu D. Dragomir & Valentin Florentin Dumitru, 2023. "Recognition and Measurement of Crypto-Assets from the Perspective of Retail Holders," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jfinte:v:2:y:2023:i:3:p:31-559:d:1218817
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2674-1032/2/3/31/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2674-1032/2/3/31/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sheldon Bennett & Ken Charbonneau & Ryan Leopold & Linda Mezon & Carol Paradine & Anthony Scilipoti & Rebecca Villmann, 2020. "Blockchain and Cryptoassets: Insights from Practice†," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 283-302, December.
    2. Douglas Skinner, 2008. "A reply to Lev's rejoinder to ‘Accounting for intangibles – a critical review of policy recommendations’," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 215-216.
    3. Alsalmi, Noora & Ullah, Subhan & Rafique, Muhammad, 2023. "Accounting for digital currencies," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    4. Simona Andreea Apostu & Mirela Panait & Làszló Vasa & Constanta Mihaescu & Zbyslaw Dobrowolski, 2022. "NFTs and Cryptocurrencies—The Metamorphosis of the Economy under the Sign of Blockchain: A Time Series Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-13, September.
    5. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-06-2022-5850 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Shaen Corbet & John W. Goodell & Samet Gunay & Kerem Kaskaloglu, 2023. "Are DeFi tokens a separate asset class from conventional cryptocurrencies?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(2), pages 609-630, March.
    7. Boido, Claudio & Aliano, Mauro, 2023. "Digital art and non-fungible-token: Bubble or revolution?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    8. Gina Raluca Guse & Marian Dragos Mangiuc, 2022. "Digital Transformation in Romanian Accounting Practice and Education: Impact and Perspectives," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(59), pages 252-252.
    9. Anselmi, Giulio & Petrella, Giovanni, 2023. "Non-fungible token artworks: More crypto than art?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    10. Stuart Mestelman & Emad Mohammad & Mohamed Shehata, 2015. "The Convergence of IFRS and U.S. GAAP: Evidence from the SEC's Removal of Form 20‐F Reconciliations," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(3), pages 190-211, September.
    11. Filip Hampl & Lucie Gyönyörová, 2021. "Can Fiat‐backed Stablecoins Be Considered Cash or Cash Equivalents Under International Financial Reporting Standards Rules?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(3), pages 233-255, September.
    12. Tomasz Tomczak, 2022. "Crypto-assets and crypto-assets’ subcategories under MiCA Regulation," Capital Markets Law Journal, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(3), pages 365-382.
    13. Rosanna Spanò & Maurizio Massaro & Luca Ferri & John Dumay & Jana Schmitz, 2022. "Blockchain in accounting, accountability and assurance: an overview," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(7), pages 1493-1506, July.
    14. Douglas Skinner, 2008. "Accounting for intangibles – a critical review of policy recommendations," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 191-204.
    15. Lennart Ante & Ingo Fiedler & Jan Marius Willruth & Fred Steinmetz, 2023. "A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research on Stablecoins," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-14, January.
    16. Hsieh, Sheng-Feng & Brennan, Gerard, 2022. "Issues, risks, and challenges for auditing crypto asset transactions," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    17. Hong Bao & David Roubaud, 2022. "Non-Fungible Token: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-9, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Proelss, Juliane & Sévigny, Stéphane & Schweizer, Denis, 2023. "GameFi: The perfect symbiosis of blockchain, tokens, DeFi, and NFTs?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Smith, Julia A. & Cordina, Renzo, 2014. "The role of accounting in high-technology investments," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 309-322.
    3. Warren Maroun & Wayne van Zijl & Rottok Chesaina & Robert Garnett, 2022. "The Beautiful Game: Fair Value, Accountability and Accounting for Player Registrations," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(3), pages 334-351, September.
    4. Stephen Penman, 2021. "Accounting for Risk," Foundations and Trends(R) in Accounting, now publishers, vol. 15(4), pages 373-507, November.
    5. Sandra Brosnan & David O’Donnell & Philip O’Regan, 2019. "A performative exploration of the lifeworlds of human capital and financial capital: an intellectual capital case vignette," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(2), pages 321-344, June.
    6. Ioniţă Cătălin Gabriel, 2022. "Exploration vs. Exploitation: How Innovation Strategies Impact Firm Performance and Competitive Advantage," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 31-46, August.
    7. Michal Novák, 2018. "The Quality of Disclosure under IAS 38 in Financial Statements of Entities Listed on PSE," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2018(2), pages 31-44.
    8. Labidi, Manel & Gajewski, Jean François, 2019. "Does increased disclosure of intangible assets enhance liquidity around new equity offerings?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 426-437.
    9. Hsu, Po-Hsuan & Taylor, Mark P. & Wang, Zigan & Xu, Qi, 2022. "Currency volatility and global technological innovation," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    10. Yaghoub Abdi & Xiaoni Li & Xavier Càmara-Turull, 2023. "Firm value in the airline industry: perspectives on the impact of sustainability and Covid-19," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, December.
    11. Foglia, Matteo & Maci, Giampiero & Pacelli, Vincenzo, 2024. "FinTech and fan tokens: Understanding the risks spillover of digital asset investment," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    12. Hossain, Ashrafee T. & Masum, Abdullah-Al & Xu, Jian, 2023. "COVID-19, a blessing in disguise for the Tech sector: Evidence from stock price crash risk," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    13. Frédérique Evraert-Bardinet, 2017. "Intellectual capital, governance and institutional factors [Capital intellectuel, gouvernance et facteurs institutionnels]," Post-Print hal-01907521, HAL.
    14. Xiaolu Xu & Leo L. Yang & Joseph H. Zhang, 2022. "How do auditors respond to client firms’ technological peer pressure? Evidence from going‐concern opinions," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(9-10), pages 1553-1580, October.
    15. Xuejing Xie & Weiguo Zhang, 2023. "Should More Internally Generated Intangible Assets Be Recognized? A Commentary," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 59(1), pages 6-31, March.
    16. Guthrie, James & Ricceri, Federica & Dumay, John, 2012. "Reflections and projections: A decade of Intellectual Capital Accounting Research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 68-82.
    17. Barry Eichengreen & Ganesh Viswanath-Natraj, 2022. "Stablecoins and Central Bank Digital Currencies: Policy and Regulatory Challenges," Asian Economic Papers, MIT Press, vol. 21(1), pages 29-46, Winter/Sp.
    18. Theodore Panagiotidis & Georgios Papapanagiotou, 2024. "A note on the determinants of NFTs returns," Working Paper series 24-07, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.
    19. Assaf, Ata & Demir, Ender & Ersan, Oguz, 2024. "Detecting and date-stamping bubbles in fan tokens," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 98-113.
    20. Sinziana-Maria Rindasu & Ioan Dan Topor & Liliana Ionescu-Feleaga, 2023. "The Evolution of Management Accountants' Digital Skills in Industry 4.0: A Qualitative Approach," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 1, pages 38-48, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jfinte:v:2:y:2023:i:3:p:31-559:d:1218817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.