IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2005.02505.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A generative adversarial network approach to calibration of local stochastic volatility models

Author

Listed:
  • Christa Cuchiero
  • Wahid Khosrawi
  • Josef Teichmann

Abstract

We propose a fully data-driven approach to calibrate local stochastic volatility (LSV) models, circumventing in particular the ad hoc interpolation of the volatility surface. To achieve this, we parametrize the leverage function by a family of feed-forward neural networks and learn their parameters directly from the available market option prices. This should be seen in the context of neural SDEs and (causal) generative adversarial networks: we generate volatility surfaces by specific neural SDEs, whose quality is assessed by quantifying, possibly in an adversarial manner, distances to market prices. The minimization of the calibration functional relies strongly on a variance reduction technique based on hedging and deep hedging, which is interesting in its own right: it allows the calculation of model prices and model implied volatilities in an accurate way using only small sets of sample paths. For numerical illustration we implement a SABR-type LSV model and conduct a thorough statistical performance analysis on many samples of implied volatility smiles, showing the accuracy and stability of the method.

Suggested Citation

  • Christa Cuchiero & Wahid Khosrawi & Josef Teichmann, 2020. "A generative adversarial network approach to calibration of local stochastic volatility models," Papers 2005.02505, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2020.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2005.02505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.02505
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian Bayer & Blanka Horvath & Aitor Muguruza & Benjamin Stemper & Mehdi Tomas, 2019. "On deep calibration of (rough) stochastic volatility models," Papers 1908.08806, arXiv.org.
    2. Jim Gatheral & Thibault Jaisson & Mathieu Rosenbaum, 2018. "Volatility is rough," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 933-949, June.
    3. Frédéric Abergel & Rémi Tachet, 2010. "A nonlinear partial integro-differential equation from mathematical finance," Post-Print hal-00611962, HAL.
    4. Magnus Wiese & Lianjun Bai & Ben Wood & Hans Buehler, 2019. "Deep Hedging: Learning to Simulate Equity Option Markets," Papers 1911.01700, arXiv.org.
    5. Justin Sirignano & Rama Cont, 2019. "Universal features of price formation in financial markets: perspectives from deep learning," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(9), pages 1449-1459, September.
    6. René Carmona & Sergey Nadtochiy, 2009. "Local volatility dynamic models," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-48, January.
    7. Yuri F. Saporito & Xu Yang & Jorge P. Zubelli, 2017. "The Calibration of Stochastic-Local Volatility Models - An Inverse Problem Perspective," Papers 1711.03023, arXiv.org.
    8. Yves-Laurent Kom Samo & Alexander Vervuurt, 2016. "Stochastic Portfolio Theory: A Machine Learning Perspective," Papers 1605.02654, arXiv.org.
    9. Stephan Eckstein & Michael Kupper, 2018. "Computation of optimal transport and related hedging problems via penalization and neural networks," Papers 1802.08539, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2019.
    10. Hans Buhler & Blanka Horvath & Terry Lyons & Imanol Perez Arribas & Ben Wood, 2020. "A Data-driven Market Simulator for Small Data Environments," Papers 2006.14498, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christa Cuchiero & Wahid Khosrawi & Josef Teichmann, 2020. "A Generative Adversarial Network Approach to Calibration of Local Stochastic Volatility Models," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-31, September.
    2. Hans Buhler & Blanka Horvath & Terry Lyons & Imanol Perez Arribas & Ben Wood, 2020. "A Data-driven Market Simulator for Small Data Environments," Papers 2006.14498, arXiv.org.
    3. Sebastian Jaimungal, 2022. "Reinforcement learning and stochastic optimisation," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 103-129, January.
    4. Christa Cuchiero & Guido Gazzani & Janka Moller & Sara Svaluto-Ferro, 2023. "Joint calibration to SPX and VIX options with signature-based models," Papers 2301.13235, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2024.
    5. Elisa Alòs & Maria Elvira Mancino & Tai-Ho Wang, 2019. "Volatility and volatility-linked derivatives: estimation, modeling, and pricing," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 42(2), pages 321-349, December.
    6. Blanka Horvath & Josef Teichmann & Žan Žurič, 2021. "Deep Hedging under Rough Volatility," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Mathieu Rosenbaum & Jianfei Zhang, 2022. "On the universality of the volatility formation process: when machine learning and rough volatility agree," Papers 2206.14114, arXiv.org.
    8. Peter K. Friz & Paul Gassiat & Paolo Pigato, 2022. "Short-dated smile under rough volatility: asymptotics and numerics," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 463-480, March.
    9. Florian Bourgey & Stefano De Marco & Peter K. Friz & Paolo Pigato, 2023. "Local volatility under rough volatility," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 1119-1145, October.
    10. Francesca Biagini & Lukas Gonon & Niklas Walter, 2024. "Universal randomised signatures for generative time series modelling," Papers 2406.10214, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2024.
    11. Blanka Horvath & Josef Teichmann & Zan Zuric, 2021. "Deep Hedging under Rough Volatility," Papers 2102.01962, arXiv.org.
    12. Qinwen Zhu & Gr'egoire Loeper & Wen Chen & Nicolas Langren'e, 2020. "Markovian approximation of the rough Bergomi model for Monte Carlo option pricing," Papers 2007.02113, arXiv.org.
    13. Giorgia Callegaro & Martino Grasselli & Gilles Paèes, 2021. "Fast Hybrid Schemes for Fractional Riccati Equations (Rough Is Not So Tough)," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(1), pages 221-254, February.
    14. Qinwen Zhu & Gregoire Loeper & Wen Chen & Nicolas Langrené, 2021. "Markovian approximation of the rough Bergomi model for Monte Carlo option pricing," Post-Print hal-02910724, HAL.
    15. Patryk Gierjatowicz & Marc Sabate-Vidales & David v{S}iv{s}ka & Lukasz Szpruch & v{Z}an v{Z}uriv{c}, 2020. "Robust pricing and hedging via neural SDEs," Papers 2007.04154, arXiv.org.
    16. Brandi, Giuseppe & Di Matteo, T., 2022. "Multiscaling and rough volatility: An empirical investigation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    17. Beatrice Acciaio & Anastasis Kratsios & Gudmund Pammer, 2022. "Designing Universal Causal Deep Learning Models: The Geometric (Hyper)Transformer," Papers 2201.13094, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    18. Jaegi Jeon & Kyunghyun Park & Jeonggyu Huh, 2021. "Extensive networks would eliminate the demand for pricing formulas," Papers 2101.09064, arXiv.org.
    19. Mathieu Rosenbaum & Jianfei Zhang, 2021. "Deep calibration of the quadratic rough Heston model," Papers 2107.01611, arXiv.org, revised May 2022.
    20. Christa Cuchiero & Guido Gazzani & Sara Svaluto-Ferro, 2022. "Signature-based models: theory and calibration," Papers 2207.13136, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2005.02505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.