IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2004.09432.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Robust Arbitrage Conditions for Financial Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Derek Singh
  • Shuzhong Zhang

Abstract

This paper investigates arbitrage properties of financial markets under distributional uncertainty using Wasserstein distance as the ambiguity measure. The weak and strong forms of the classical arbitrage conditions are considered. A relaxation is introduced for which we coin the term statistical arbitrage. The simpler dual formulations of the robust arbitrage conditions are derived. A number of interesting questions arise in this context. One question is: can we compute a critical Wasserstein radius beyond which an arbitrage opportunity exists? What is the shape of the curve mapping the degree of ambiguity to statistical arbitrage levels? Other questions arise regarding the structure of best (worst) case distributions and optimal portfolios. Towards answering these questions, some theory is developed and computational experiments are conducted for specific problem instances. Finally some open questions and suggestions for future research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Derek Singh & Shuzhong Zhang, 2020. "Robust Arbitrage Conditions for Financial Markets," Papers 2004.09432, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2004.09432
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.09432
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen A. Ross, 2013. "The Arbitrage Theory of Capital Asset Pricing," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 1, pages 11-30, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. LeRoy,Stephen F. & Werner,Jan, 2014. "Principles of Financial Economics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107024120, November.
    3. Ziping Zhao & Rui Zhou & Zhongju Wang & Daniel P. Palomar, 2018. "Optimal Portfolio Design for Statistical Arbitrage in Finance," Papers 1803.02974, arXiv.org.
    4. Ostrovski, Vladimir, 2013. "Stability of no-arbitrage property under model uncertainty," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 89-92.
    5. William F. Sharpe, 1964. "Capital Asset Prices: A Theory Of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions Of Risk," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 19(3), pages 425-442, September.
    6. Christopher Krauss, 2017. "Statistical Arbitrage Pairs Trading Strategies: Review And Outlook," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 513-545, April.
    7. Daniel Bartl, 2016. "Exponential utility maximization under model uncertainty for unbounded endowments," Papers 1610.00999, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2019.
    8. Neculai Andrei, 2013. "Nonlinear Optimization Applications Using the GAMS Technology," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, Springer, edition 127, number 978-1-4614-6797-7, December.
    9. Focardi, Sergio M. & Fabozzi, Frank J. & Mitov, Ivan K., 2016. "A new approach to statistical arbitrage: Strategies based on dynamic factor models of prices and their performance," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 134-155.
    10. Jose Blanchet & Karthyek Murthy, 2019. "Quantifying Distributional Model Risk via Optimal Transport," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 565-600, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Derek Singh & Shuzhong Zhang, 2020. "Distributionally Robust Profit Opportunities," Papers 2006.11279, arXiv.org.
    2. Derek Singh & Shuzhong Zhang, 2020. "Distributionally Robust XVA via Wasserstein Distance: Wrong Way Counterparty Credit and Funding Risk," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 7(6), pages 70-100, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Derek Singh & Shuzhong Zhang, 2021. "Robust Arbitrage Conditions for Financial Markets," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 1-52, September.
    2. Trent Spears & Stefan Zohren & Stephen Roberts, 2023. "On statistical arbitrage under a conditional factor model of equity returns," Papers 2309.02205, arXiv.org.
    3. Buncic, Daniel & Stern, Cord, 2019. "Forecast ranked tailored equity portfolios," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    4. Fabian Krause & Jan-Peter Calliess, 2024. "End-to-End Policy Learning of a Statistical Arbitrage Autoencoder Architecture," Papers 2402.08233, arXiv.org.
    5. Michael Senescall & Rand Kwong Yew Low, 2024. "Quantitative Portfolio Management: Review and Outlook," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-25, September.
    6. Raymond C. W. Leung & Yu-Man Tam, 2021. "Statistical Arbitrage Risk Premium by Machine Learning," Papers 2103.09987, arXiv.org.
    7. Sabino da Silva, Fernando A.B. & Ziegelmann, Flavio A. & Caldeira, João F., 2023. "A pairs trading strategy based on mixed copulas," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 16-34.
    8. Shi, Huai-Long & Zhou, Wei-Xing, 2022. "Factor volatility spillover and its implications on factor premia," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    9. David E. Allen & Michael McAleer & Abhay K. Singh, 2019. "Daily market news sentiment and stock prices," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(30), pages 3212-3235, June.
    10. Rostagno, Luciano Martin, 2005. "Empirical tests of parametric and non-parametric Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) measures for the Brazilian stock market index," ISU General Staff Papers 2005010108000021878, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    11. Shaikh, Salman, 2013. "Investment Decisions by Analysts: A Case Study of KSE," MPRA Paper 53802, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Boes, M.J., 2006. "Index options : Pricing, implied densities and returns," Other publications TiSEM e9ed8a9f-2472-430a-b666-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Nathan Jensen, 2007. "International institutions and market expectations: Stock price responses to the WTO ruling on the 2002 U.S. steel tariffs," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 261-280, September.
    14. Roman Mestre, 2021. "A wavelet approach of investing behaviors and their effects on risk exposures," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-37, December.
    15. Sharpe, William F, 1991. "Capital Asset Prices with and without Negative Holdings," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 46(2), pages 489-509, June.
    16. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2514 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Zura Kakushadze, 2014. "4-Factor Model for Overnight Returns," Papers 1410.5513, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2015.
    18. Zied Ftiti & Aviral Tiwari & Amél Belanès & Khaled Guesmi, 2015. "Tests of Financial Market Contagion: Evolutionary Cospectral Analysis Versus Wavelet Analysis," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 46(4), pages 575-611, December.
    19. Francesco Lautizi, 2015. "Large Scale Covariance Estimates for Portfolio Selection," CEIS Research Paper 353, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 07 Aug 2015.
    20. Tinic, Murat & Sensoy, Ahmet & Demir, Muge & Nguyen, Duc Khuong, 2020. "Broker Network Connectivity and the Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns," MPRA Paper 104719, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Bai, Jushan & Ando, Tomohiro, 2013. "Multifactor asset pricing with a large number of observable risk factors and unobservable common and group-specific factors," MPRA Paper 52785, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Dec 2013.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2004.09432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.