IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1902.00706.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Rate of Convergence of the Probability of Ruin in the Cram\'er-Lundberg Model to its Diffusion Approximation

Author

Listed:
  • Asaf Cohen
  • Virginia R. Young

Abstract

We analyze the probability of ruin for the {\it scaled} classical Cram\'er-Lundberg (CL) risk process and the corresponding diffusion approximation. The scaling, introduced by Iglehart \cite{I1969} to the actuarial literature, amounts to multiplying the Poisson rate $\la$ by $n$, dividing the claim severity by $\sqrtn$, and adjusting the premium rate so that net premium income remains constant. %Therefore, we think of the associated diffusion approximation as being "asymptotic for large values of $\la$." We are the first to use a comparison method to prove convergence of the probability of ruin for the scaled CL process and to derive the rate of convergence. Specifically, we prove a comparison lemma for the corresponding integro-differential equation and use this comparison lemma to prove that the probability of ruin for the scaled CL process converges to the probability of ruin for the limiting diffusion process. Moreover, we show that the rate of convergence for the ruin probability is of order $\mO\big(n^{-1/2}\big)$, and we show that the convergence is {\it uniform} with respect to the surplus. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first rate of convergence achieved for these ruin probabilities, and we show that it is the tightest one in the general case. For the case of exponentially-distributed claims, we are able to improve the approximation arising from the diffusion, attaining a uniform $\mO\big(n^{-k/2}\big)$ rate of convergence for arbitrary $k \in \N$. We also include two examples that illustrate our results.

Suggested Citation

  • Asaf Cohen & Virginia R. Young, 2019. "Rate of Convergence of the Probability of Ruin in the Cram\'er-Lundberg Model to its Diffusion Approximation," Papers 1902.00706, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2020.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1902.00706
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.00706
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Vylder, F. & Goovaerts, M., 1984. "Bounds for classical ruin probabilities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 121-131, April.
    2. Gerber, Hans U. & Shiu, Elias S.W. & Smith, Nathaniel, 2008. "Methods for estimating the optimal dividend barrier and the probability of ruin," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 243-254, February.
    3. Broeckx, F. & Goovaerts, M. & De Vylder, F., 1986. "Ordering of risks and ruin probabilities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 35-39, January.
    4. K. Ronnie Sircar & George Papanicolaou, 1999. "Stochastic volatility, smile & asymptotics," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 107-145.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hansjoerg Albrecher & Pablo Azcue & Nora Muler, 2020. "Optimal ratcheting of dividends in a Brownian risk model," Papers 2012.10632, arXiv.org.
    2. Ng, Kenneth Tsz Hin & Chong, Wing Fung, 2024. "Optimal investment in defined contribution pension schemes with forward utility preferences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 192-211.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cohen, Asaf & Young, Virginia R., 2020. "Rate of convergence of the probability of ruin in the Cramér–Lundberg model to its diffusion approximation," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 333-340.
    2. Stathis Chadjiconsatntinidis, 2024. "Two-sided Bounds for Renewal Equations and Ruin Quantities," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 1-54, June.
    3. Chadjiconstantinidis, Stathis & Xenos, Panos, 2022. "Refinements of bounds for tails of compound distributions and ruin probabilities," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 421(C).
    4. Cai, Jun & Garrido, Jose, 1998. "Aging properties and bounds for ruin probabilities and stop-loss premiums," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 33-43, October.
    5. Nan Chen & S. G. Kou, 2009. "Credit Spreads, Optimal Capital Structure, And Implied Volatility With Endogenous Default And Jump Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(3), pages 343-378, July.
    6. Psarrakos, Georgios & Politis, Konstadinos, 2008. "Tail bounds for the joint distribution of the surplus prior to and at ruin," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 163-176, February.
    7. Liang, Xiaoqing & Liang, Zhibin & Young, Virginia R., 2020. "Optimal reinsurance under the mean–variance premium principle to minimize the probability of ruin," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 128-146.
    8. Gerber, Hans U. & Smith, Nathaniel, 2008. "Optimal dividends with incomplete information in the dual model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 227-233, October.
    9. Alex Langnau & Yanko Punchev, 2011. "Stochastic Price Dynamics Implied By the Limit Order Book," Papers 1105.4789, arXiv.org.
    10. Chadjiconstantinidis, Stathis & Politis, Konstadinos, 2007. "Two-sided bounds for the distribution of the deficit at ruin in the renewal risk model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 41-52, July.
    11. Maxim Bichuch & Jean-Pierre Fouque, 2019. "Optimal Investment with Correlated Stochastic Volatility Factors," Papers 1908.07626, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    12. Andrea Barletta & Elisa Nicolato & Stefano Pagliarani, 2019. "The short‐time behavior of VIX‐implied volatilities in a multifactor stochastic volatility framework," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 928-966, July.
    13. Wang, Chunwei & Yin, Chuancun & Li, Erqiang, 2010. "On the classical risk model with credit and debit interests under absolute ruin," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(5-6), pages 427-436, March.
    14. Hu, Xiang & Duan, Baige & Zhang, Lianzeng, 2017. "De Vylder approximation to the optimal retention for a combination of quota-share and excess of loss reinsurance with partial information," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 48-55.
    15. Jean-Pierre Fouque & Matthew Lorig & Ronnie Sircar, 2012. "Second Order Multiscale Stochastic Volatility Asymptotics: Stochastic Terminal Layer Analysis & Calibration," Papers 1208.5802, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2015.
    16. Walter Mudzimbabwe, 2020. "A time consistent derivative strategy," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 7(01), pages 1-25, March.
    17. Yuen, Kam-Chuen & Zhou, Ming & Guo, Junyi, 2008. "On a risk model with debit interest and dividend payments," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(15), pages 2426-2432, October.
    18. Yuan-Hung Hsuku, 2007. "Dynamic consumption and asset allocation with derivative securities," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 137-149.
    19. Florin Avram & Andras Horváth & Serge Provost & Ulyses Solon, 2019. "On the Padé and Laguerre–Tricomi–Weeks Moments Based Approximations of the Scale Function W and of the Optimal Dividends Barrier for Spectrally Negative Lévy Risk Processes," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-24, December.
    20. Vagnani, Gianluca, 2009. "The Black-Scholes model as a determinant of the implied volatility smile: A simulation study," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 103-118, October.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1902.00706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.