IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1812.10752.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How to avoid the zero-power trap in testing for correlation

Author

Listed:
  • David Preinerstorfer

Abstract

In testing for correlation of the errors in regression models the power of tests can be very low for strongly correlated errors. This counterintuitive phenomenon has become known as the "zero-power trap". Despite a considerable amount of literature devoted to this problem, mainly focusing on its detection, a convincing solution has not yet been found. In this article we first discuss theoretical results concerning the occurrence of the zero-power trap phenomenon. Then, we suggest and compare three ways to avoid it. Given an initial test that suffers from the zero-power trap, the method we recommend for practice leads to a modified test whose power converges to one as the correlation gets very strong. Furthermore, the modified test has approximately the same power function as the initial test, and thus approximately preserves all of its optimality properties. We also provide some numerical illustrations in the context of testing for network generated correlation.

Suggested Citation

  • David Preinerstorfer, 2018. "How to avoid the zero-power trap in testing for correlation," Papers 1812.10752, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1812.10752
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1812.10752
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martellosio, Federico, 2010. "Power Properties Of Invariant Tests For Spatial Autocorrelation In Linear Regression," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(1), pages 152-186, February.
    2. Martellosio, Federico, 2008. "Testing for spatial autocorrelation: the regressors that make the power disappear," MPRA Paper 10542, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Federico Martellosio, 2012. "Testing for Spatial Autocorrelation: The Regressors that Make the Power Disappear," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 215-240.
    4. Anders Bredahl Kock & David Preinerstorfer, 2019. "Power in High‐Dimensional Testing Problems," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 87(3), pages 1055-1069, May.
    5. Christian Kleiber & Walter Krämer, 2005. "Finite-sample power of the Durbin--Watson test against fractionally integrated disturbances," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 8(3), pages 406-417, December.
    6. Robert B. Davies, 1980. "The Distribution of a Linear Combination of χ2 Random Variables," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 29(3), pages 323-333, November.
    7. Kramer, Walter & Zeisel, Helmut, 1990. "Finite sample power of linear regression autocorrelation tests," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 363-372, March.
    8. Preinerstorfer, David & Pötscher, Benedikt M., 2016. "On Size And Power Of Heteroskedasticity And Autocorrelation Robust Tests," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 261-358, April.
    9. Preinerstorfer, David & Pötscher, Benedikt M., 2017. "On The Power Of Invariant Tests For Hypotheses On A Covariance Matrix," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(1), pages 1-68, February.
    10. Jianqing Fan & Yuan Liao & Jiawei Yao, 2015. "Power Enhancement in High‐Dimensional Cross‐Sectional Tests," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 83(4), pages 1497-1541, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Preinerstorfer, David & Pötscher, Benedikt M., 2017. "On The Power Of Invariant Tests For Hypotheses On A Covariance Matrix," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(1), pages 1-68, February.
    2. Badi H. Baltagi & Chihwa Kao & Long Liu, 2013. "The Estimation and Testing of a Linear Regression with Near Unit Root in the Spatial Autoregressive Error Term," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 241-270, September.
    3. Mynbaev, Kairat, 2011. "Distributions escaping to infinity and the limiting power of the Cliff-Ord test for autocorrelation," MPRA Paper 44402, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 18 Sep 2012.
    4. Maxwell L. King & Sivagowry Sriananthakumar, 2015. "Point Optimal Testing: A Survey of the Post 1987 Literature," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 5/15, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    5. Pötscher, Benedikt M. & Preinerstorfer, David, 2021. "Valid Heteroskedasticity Robust Testing," MPRA Paper 107420, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Cappuccio, Nunzio & Lubian, Diego & Mistrorigo, Mirko, 2015. "The power of unit root tests under local-to-finite variance errors," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 205-217.
    7. Ge, S. & Li, S. & Linton, O., 2020. "A Dynamic Network of Arbitrage Characteristics," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2060, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    8. Anders Bredahl Kock & David Preinerstorfer, 2021. "Superconsistency of Tests in High Dimensions," Papers 2106.03700, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    9. Pötscher, Benedikt M. & Preinerstorfer, David, 2018. "Controlling the size of autocorrelation robust tests," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 406-431.
    10. Badi H. Baltagi & Junjie Shu, 2024. "A Survey of Spatial Unit Roots," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-31, March.
    11. David M. Drukker & Ingmar R. Prucha, 2013. "On the I -super-2( q ) Test Statistic for Spatial Dependence: Finite Sample Standardization and Properties," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 271-292, September.
    12. Robinson, Peter M. & Rossi, Francesca, 2015. "Refined Tests For Spatial Correlation," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(6), pages 1249-1280, December.
    13. Boot, Tom, 2023. "Joint inference based on Stein-type averaging estimators in the linear regression model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 1542-1563.
    14. He, Yi & Jaidee, Sombut & Gao, Jiti, 2023. "Most powerful test against a sequence of high dimensional local alternatives," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 234(1), pages 151-177.
    15. Francesca Rossi & Peter M. Robinson, 2020. "Higher-Order Least Squares Inference for Spatial Autoregressions," Working Papers 04/2020, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    16. Jungyoon Lee & Peter C.B. Phillips & Francesca Rossi, 2020. "Consistent Misspecification Testing in Spatial Autoregressive Models," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2256, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    17. Federico Martellosio & Grant Hillier, 2019. "Adjusted QMLE for the spatial autoregressive parameter," Papers 1909.08141, arXiv.org.
    18. Yi He & Sombut Jaidee & Jiti Gao, 2020. "Most Powerful Test against High Dimensional Free Alternatives," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 13/20, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    19. Escanciano, Juan Carlos & Jacho-Chávez, David T., 2010. "Approximating the critical values of Cramér-von Mises tests in general parametric conditional specifications," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 625-636, March.
    20. Xiong, Ruoxuan & Pelger, Markus, 2023. "Large dimensional latent factor modeling with missing observations and applications to causal inference," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 271-301.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1812.10752. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.