IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1707.09351.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Nash equilibria for game contingent claims with utility-based hedging

Author

Listed:
  • Klebert Kentia
  • Christoph Kuhn

Abstract

Game contingent claims (GCCs) generalize American contingent claims by allowing the writer to recall the option as long as it is not exercised, at the price of paying some penalty. In incomplete markets, an appealing approach is to analyze GCCs like their European and American counterparts by solving option holder's and writer's optimal investment problems in the underlying securities. By this, partial hedging opportunities are taken into account. We extend results in the literature by solving the stochastic game corresponding to GCCs with both continuous time stopping and trading. Namely, we construct Nash equilibria by rewriting the game as a non-zero-sum stopping game in which players compare payoffs in terms of their exponential utility indifference values. As a by-product, we also obtain an existence result for the optimal exercise time of an American claim under utility indifference valuation by relating it to the corresponding nonlinear Snell envelope.

Suggested Citation

  • Klebert Kentia & Christoph Kuhn, 2017. "Nash equilibria for game contingent claims with utility-based hedging," Papers 1707.09351, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2018.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1707.09351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.09351
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcel Nutz & Jianfeng Zhang, 2012. "Optimal stopping under adverse nonlinear expectation and related games," Papers 1212.2140, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2015.
    2. Frank Riedel, 2009. "Optimal Stopping With Multiple Priors," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 857-908, May.
    3. Erhan Bayraktar & Ioannis Karatzas & Song Yao, 2009. "Optimal Stopping for Dynamic Convex Risk Measures," Papers 0909.4948, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2009.
    4. Miryana Grigorova & Marie-Claire Quenez, 2017. "Optimal stopping and a non-zero-sum Dynkin game in discrete time with risk measures induced by BSDEs," Papers 1705.03724, arXiv.org.
    5. Freddy Delbaen & Shige Peng & Emanuela Rosazza Gianin, 2010. "Representation of the penalty term of dynamic concave utilities," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 449-472, September.
    6. Freddy Delbaen & Peter Grandits & Thorsten Rheinländer & Dominick Samperi & Martin Schweizer & Christophe Stricker, 2002. "Exponential Hedging and Entropic Penalties," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(2), pages 99-123, April.
    7. Jan Kallsen & Christoph Kühn, 2004. "Pricing derivatives of American and game type in incomplete markets," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 261-284, May.
    8. Erhan Bayraktar & Song Yao, 2009. "Optimal Stopping for Non-linear Expectations," Papers 0905.3601, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2011.
    9. Bayraktar, Erhan & Yao, Song, 2011. "Optimal stopping for non-linear expectations--Part I," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 185-211, February.
    10. Marco Frittelli, 2000. "The Minimal Entropy Martingale Measure and the Valuation Problem in Incomplete Markets," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(1), pages 39-52, January.
    11. Yuri Kifer, 2000. "Game options," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 443-463.
    12. Bion-Nadal, Jocelyne, 2009. "Time consistent dynamic risk processes," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 633-654, February.
    13. Michael Mania & Martin Schweizer, 2005. "Dynamic exponential utility indifference valuation," Papers math/0508489, arXiv.org.
    14. Yuri M. Kabanov & Christophe Stricker, 2002. "On the optimal portfolio for the exponential utility maximization: remarks to the six‐author paper," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(2), pages 125-134, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miryana Grigorova & Marie-Claire Quenez & Yuan Peng, 2023. "Non-linear non-zero-sum Dynkin games with Bermudan strategies," Papers 2311.01086, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bayraktar, Erhan & Yao, Song, 2017. "Optimal stopping with random maturity under nonlinear expectations," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 127(8), pages 2586-2629.
    2. Irina Penner & Anthony Réveillac, 2015. "Risk measures for processes and BSDEs," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 23-66, January.
    3. Volker Krätschmer & Marcel Ladkau & Roger J. A. Laeven & John G. M. Schoenmakers & Mitja Stadje, 2018. "Optimal Stopping Under Uncertainty in Drift and Jump Intensity," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 1177-1209, November.
    4. Roger J. A. Laeven & Mitja Stadje, 2014. "Robust Portfolio Choice and Indifference Valuation," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 1109-1141, November.
    5. Michail Anthropelos & Nikolaos E. Frangos & Stylianos Z. Xanthopoulos & Athanasios N. Yannacopoulos, 2008. "On contingent claims pricing in incomplete markets: A risk sharing approach," Papers 0809.4781, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2012.
    6. Dejian Tian, 2022. "Pricing principle via Tsallis relative entropy in incomplete market," Papers 2201.05316, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2022.
    7. Grigorova, Miryana & Imkeller, Peter & Ouknine, Youssef & Quenez, Marie-Claire, 2018. "Optimal Stopping With ƒ-Expectations: the irregular case," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 587, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    8. Marcel Nutz & Jianfeng Zhang, 2012. "Optimal stopping under adverse nonlinear expectation and related games," Papers 1212.2140, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2015.
    9. Mahan Tahvildari, 2021. "Forward indifference valuation and hedging of basis risk under partial information," Papers 2101.00251, arXiv.org.
    10. Bayraktar, Erhan & Yao, Song, 2015. "Doubly reflected BSDEs with integrable parameters and related Dynkin games," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 125(12), pages 4489-4542.
    11. Miryana Grigorova & Marie-Claire Quenez, 2017. "Optimal stopping and a non-zero-sum Dynkin game in discrete time with risk measures induced by BSDEs," Papers 1705.03724, arXiv.org.
    12. Erhan Bayraktar & Song Yao, 2013. "On the Robust Optimal Stopping Problem," Papers 1301.0091, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2016.
    13. Miryana Grigorova & Marie-Claire Quenez, 2017. "Optimal stopping and a non-zero-sum Dynkin game in discrete time with risk measures induced by BSDEs," Post-Print hal-01519215, HAL.
    14. Johannes Gerer & Gregor Dorfleitner, 2016. "A Note On Utility Indifference Pricing," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(06), pages 1-17, September.
    15. Kallsen Jan & Rheinländer Thorsten, 2011. "Asymptotic utility-based pricing and hedging for exponential utility," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 28(1), pages 17-36, March.
    16. Thorsten Rheinländer & Jenny Sexton, 2011. "Hedging Derivatives," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 8062, August.
    17. Daniel Fernholz & Ioannis Karatzas, 2012. "Optimal arbitrage under model uncertainty," Papers 1202.2999, arXiv.org.
    18. Mark P. Owen & Gordan Žitković, 2009. "Optimal Investment With An Unbounded Random Endowment And Utility‐Based Pricing," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(1), pages 129-159, January.
    19. Grigorova, Miryana & Imkeller, Peter & Ouknine, Youssef & Quenez, Marie-Claire, 2020. "Optimal stopping with f-expectations: The irregular case," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 1258-1288.
    20. Tahir Choulli & Jun Deng & Junfeng Ma, 2012. "How Non-Arbitrage, Viability and Num\'eraire Portfolio are Related," Papers 1211.4598, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2014.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1707.09351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.