IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/finsto/v8y2004i2p261-284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pricing derivatives of American and game type in incomplete markets

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Kallsen
  • Christoph Kühn

Abstract

In this paper the neutral valuation approach is applied to American and game options in incomplete markets. Neutral prices occur if investors are utility maximizers and if derivative supply and demand are balanced. Game contingent claims are derivative contracts that can be terminated by both counterparties at any time before expiration. They generalize American options where this right is limited to the buyer of the claim. It turns out that as in the complete case, the price process of American and game contingent claims corresponds to a Snell envelope or to the value of a Dynkin game, respectively. On the technical level, an important role is played by $\sigma$ -sub- and $\sigma$ -supermartingales. We characterize these processes in terms of semimartingale characteristics. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg 2004

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Kallsen & Christoph Kühn, 2004. "Pricing derivatives of American and game type in incomplete markets," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 261-284, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:finsto:v:8:y:2004:i:2:p:261-284
    DOI: 10.1007/s00780-003-0110-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00780-003-0110-7
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00780-003-0110-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hsuan-Ku Liu, 2013. "The pricing formula for cancellable European options," Papers 1304.5962, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2014.
    2. Ivan Guo & Marek Rutkowski, 2017. "Arbitrage-free pricing of multi-person game claims in discrete time," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 111-155, January.
    3. Yuri Kifer, 2012. "Dynkin Games and Israeli Options," Papers 1209.1791, arXiv.org.
    4. Mark Owen & Gordan Zitkovic, 2007. "Optimal Investment with an Unbounded Random Endowment and Utility-Based Pricing," Papers 0706.0478, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2007.
    5. Johannes Gerer & Gregor Dorfleitner, 2016. "A Note On Utility Indifference Pricing," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(06), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Mark P. Owen & Gordan Žitković, 2009. "Optimal Investment With An Unbounded Random Endowment And Utility‐Based Pricing," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(1), pages 129-159, January.
    7. Gapeev, Pavel V. & Li, Libo, 2022. "Perpetual American standard and lookback options with event risk and asymmetric information," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114940, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Miryana Grigorova & Marie-Claire Quenez & Yuan Peng, 2023. "Non-linear non-zero-sum Dynkin games with Bermudan strategies," Papers 2311.01086, arXiv.org.
    9. Huang, Haishi, 2010. "Convertible Bonds: Default Risk and Uncertain Volatility," Bonn Econ Discussion Papers 09/2010, University of Bonn, Bonn Graduate School of Economics (BGSE).
    10. Kallsen Jan & Kühn Christoph, 2006. "On utility-based derivative pricing with and without intermediate trades," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 24(4), pages 415-434, October.
    11. Gapeev, Pavel V., 2008. "The integral option in a model with jumps," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(16), pages 2623-2631, November.
    12. Baurdoux, Erik J. & Kyprianou, Andreas E., 2004. "Further calculations for Israeli options," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 23916, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Rubbenstroth, Bodo, 2019. "Game Options under Knightian Uncertainty in Discrete Time," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 619, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    14. Hamadène, S. & Wang, H., 2009. "BSDEs with two RCLL reflecting obstacles driven by Brownian motion and Poisson measure and a related mixed zero-sum game," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 119(9), pages 2881-2912, September.
    15. Gapeev Pavel V. & Kühn Christoph, 2005. "Perpetual convertible bonds in jump-diffusion models," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 23(1/2005), pages 15-31, January.
    16. Said Hamadene & Jianfeng Zhang, 2008. "The Continuous Time Nonzero-sum Dynkin Game Problem and Application in Game Options," Papers 0810.5698, arXiv.org.
    17. Tumellano Sebehela, 2017. "Game Options," Annals of Financial Economics (AFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(03), pages 1-17, September.
    18. Tianyang Nie & Edward Kim & Marek Rutkowski, 2018. "Arbitrage-Free Pricing of Game Options in Nonlinear Markets," Papers 1807.05448, arXiv.org.
    19. Huang, Haishi, 2010. "Convertible Bonds: Risks and Optimal Strategies," Bonn Econ Discussion Papers 07/2010, University of Bonn, Bonn Graduate School of Economics (BGSE).
    20. Erhan Bayraktar & Song Yao, 2015. "On the Robust Dynkin Game," Papers 1506.09184, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2016.
    21. Ivan Guo & Marek Rutkowski, 2014. "Arbitrage Pricing of Multi-person Game Contingent Claims," Papers 1405.2718, arXiv.org.
    22. Yan Dolinsky, 2020. "On Shortfall Risk Minimization for Game Options," Papers 2002.01528, arXiv.org.
    23. Jan Kallsen & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2009. "Utility maximization in models with conditionally independent increments," Papers 0911.3608, arXiv.org.
    24. Zaevski, Tsvetelin S., 2020. "Discounted perpetual game put options," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    25. Klebert Kentia & Christoph Kuhn, 2017. "Nash equilibria for game contingent claims with utility-based hedging," Papers 1707.09351, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2018.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:finsto:v:8:y:2004:i:2:p:261-284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.