IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1507.02822.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Hawkes Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick J. Laub
  • Thomas Taimre
  • Philip K. Pollett

Abstract

Hawkes processes are a particularly interesting class of stochastic process that have been applied in diverse areas, from earthquake modelling to financial analysis. They are point processes whose defining characteristic is that they 'self-excite', meaning that each arrival increases the rate of future arrivals for some period of time. Hawkes processes are well established, particularly within the financial literature, yet many of the treatments are inaccessible to one not acquainted with the topic. This survey provides background, introduces the field and historical developments, and touches upon all major aspects of Hawkes processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick J. Laub & Thomas Taimre & Philip K. Pollett, 2015. "Hawkes Processes," Papers 1507.02822, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1507.02822
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1507.02822
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vladimir Filimonov & Didier Sornette, 2013. "Apparent Criticality and Calibration Issues in the Hawkes Self-Excited Point Process Model: Application to High-Frequency Financial Data," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 13-60, Swiss Finance Institute.
    2. Alexander J. McNeil & Rüdiger Frey & Paul Embrechts, 2015. "Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools Revised edition," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 2, number 10496.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maxime Morariu-Patrichi & Mikko S. Pakkanen, 2018. "State-dependent Hawkes processes and their application to limit order book modelling," Papers 1809.08060, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    2. Simon Clinet & William T. M. Dunsmuir & Gareth W. Peters & Kylie-Anne Richards, 2019. "Asymptotic Distribution of the Score Test for Detecting Marks in Hawkes Processes," Research Paper Series 404, Quantitative Finance Research Centre, University of Technology, Sydney.
    3. Anatoliy Swishchuk, 2017. "General Compound Hawkes Processes in Limit Order Books," Papers 1706.07459, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2017.
    4. Maxime Morariu-Patrichi & Mikko Pakkanen, 2018. "State-dependent Hawkes processes and their application to limit order book modelling," CREATES Research Papers 2018-26, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    5. Pierre Blanc & Jonathan Donier & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2015. "Quadratic Hawkes processes for financial prices," Papers 1509.07710, arXiv.org.
    6. Anatoliy Swishchuk & Bruno Remillard & Robert Elliott & Jonathan Chavez-Casillas, 2017. "Compound Hawkes Processes in Limit Order Books," Papers 1712.03106, arXiv.org.
    7. Anatoliy Swishchuk, 2021. "Merton Investment Problems in Finance and Insurance for the Hawkes-based Models," Papers 2104.02694, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.
    8. Anatoliy Swishchuk, 2021. "Merton Investment Problems in Finance and Insurance for the Hawkes-Based Models," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-13, June.
    9. Qiyue He & Anatoliy Swishchuk, 2019. "Quantitative and Comparative Analyses of Limit Order Books with General Compound Hawkes Processes," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-21, November.
    10. Myles Sjogren & Timothy DeLise, 2021. "General Compound Hawkes Processes for Mid-Price Prediction," Papers 2110.07075, arXiv.org.
    11. Yvenn Amara-Ouali & Yannig Goude & Pascal Massart & Jean-Michel Poggi & Hui Yan, 2021. "A Review of Electric Vehicle Load Open Data and Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-35, April.
    12. Anatoliy Swishchuk & Aiden Huffman, 2018. "General Compound Hawkes Processes in Limit Order Books," Papers 1812.02298, arXiv.org.
    13. Achraf Bahamou & Maud Doumergue & Philippe Donnat, 2019. "Hawkes processes for credit indices time series analysis: How random are trades arrival times?," Papers 1902.03714, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abduraimova, Kumushoy, 2022. "Contagion and tail risk in complex financial networks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    2. Tobias Fissler & Yannick Hoga, 2024. "How to Compare Copula Forecasts?," Papers 2410.04165, arXiv.org.
    3. Masahiko Egami & Rusudan Kevkhishvili, 2020. "Time reversal and last passage time of diffusions with applications to credit risk management," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 795-825, July.
    4. Avanzi, Benjamin & Taylor, Greg & Wong, Bernard & Yang, Xinda, 2021. "On the modelling of multivariate counts with Cox processes and dependent shot noise intensities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 9-24.
    5. Pfeifer Dietmar & Mändle Andreas & Ragulina Olena, 2017. "New copulas based on general partitions-of-unity and their applications to risk management (part II)," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 246-255, October.
    6. Diba Daraei & Kristina Sendova, 2024. "Determining Safe Withdrawal Rates for Post-Retirement via a Ruin-Theory Approach," Risks, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, April.
    7. Makam, Vaishno Devi & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis with χ2-divergences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 372-383.
    8. Nevrla, Matěj, 2020. "Systemic risk in European financial and energy sectors: Dynamic factor copula approach," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(4).
    9. H. Kaibuchi & Y. Kawasaki & G. Stupfler, 2022. "GARCH-UGH: a bias-reduced approach for dynamic extreme Value-at-Risk estimation in financial time series," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(7), pages 1277-1294, July.
    10. Battulga Gankhuu, 2022. "Merton's Default Risk Model for Private Company," Papers 2208.01974, arXiv.org.
    11. Ansari Jonathan & Rockel Marcus, 2024. "Dependence properties of bivariate copula families," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-36.
    12. Stephan Schlüter & Fabian Menz & Milena Kojić & Petar Mitić & Aida Hanić, 2022. "A Novel Approach to Generate Hourly Photovoltaic Power Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
    13. Borowska, Agnieszka & Hoogerheide, Lennart & Koopman, Siem Jan & van Dijk, Herman K., 2020. "Partially censored posterior for robust and efficient risk evaluation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 217(2), pages 335-355.
    14. Dietmar Pfeifer & Olena Ragulina, 2018. "Generating VaR Scenarios under Solvency II with Product Beta Distributions," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-15, October.
    15. E. Ramos-P'erez & P. J. Alonso-Gonz'alez & J. J. N'u~nez-Vel'azquez, 2020. "Forecasting volatility with a stacked model based on a hybridized Artificial Neural Network," Papers 2006.16383, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.
    16. Gorgi, P. & Koopman, S.J., 2023. "Beta observation-driven models with exogenous regressors: A joint analysis of realized correlation and leverage effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(2).
    17. Dimitris Bertsimas & Agni Orfanoudaki, 2021. "Algorithmic Insurance," Papers 2106.00839, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    18. Xuehai Zhang, 2019. "Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall under General Semi-parametric GARCH models," Working Papers CIE 123, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
    19. Paolo Vanini & Sebastiano Rossi & Ermin Zvizdic & Thomas Domenig, 2023. "Online payment fraud: from anomaly detection to risk management," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-25, December.
    20. Claudia Ceci & Katia Colaneri & Rdiger Frey & Verena Kock, 2019. "Value adjustments and dynamic hedging of reinsurance counterparty risk," Papers 1909.04354, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1507.02822. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.