IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1203.2564.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Percentiles of sums of heavy-tailed random variables: Beyond the single-loss approximation

Author

Listed:
  • Lorenzo Hern'andez
  • Jorge Tejero
  • Alberto Su'arez
  • Santiago Carrillo-Men'endez

Abstract

A perturbative approach is used to derive approximations of arbitrary order to estimate high percentiles of sums of positive independent random variables that exhibit heavy tails. Closed-form expressions for the successive approximations are obtained both when the number of terms in the sum is deterministic and when it is random. The zeroth order approximation is the percentile of the maximum term in the sum. Higher orders in the perturbative series involve the right-truncated moments of the individual random variables that appear in the sum. These censored moments are always finite. As a result, and in contrast to previous approximations proposed in the literature, the perturbative series has the same form regardless of whether these random variables have a finite mean or not. The accuracy of the approximations is illustrated for a variety of distributions and a wide range of parameters. The quality of the estimate improves as more terms are included in the perturbative series, specially for higher percentiles and heavier tails.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorenzo Hern'andez & Jorge Tejero & Alberto Su'arez & Santiago Carrillo-Men'endez, 2012. "Percentiles of sums of heavy-tailed random variables: Beyond the single-loss approximation," Papers 1203.2564, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2012.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1203.2564
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.2564
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tsourti, Zoi & Panaretos, John, 2004. "Extreme-value analysis of teletraffic data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 85-103, February.
    2. Gourieroux, C. & Laurent, J. P. & Scaillet, O., 2000. "Sensitivity analysis of Values at Risk," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 7(3-4), pages 225-245, November.
    3. Nadarajah, Saralees & Ali, M. Masoom, 2006. "The distribution of sums, products and ratios for Lawrance and Lewis's bivariate exponential random variables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(12), pages 3449-3463, August.
    4. Embrechts, P. & Veraverbeke, N., 1982. "Estimates for the probability of ruin with special emphasis on the possibility of large claims," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 55-72, January.
    5. Omey, E. & Willekens, E., 1986. "Second order behaviour of the tail of a subordinated probability distribution," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 339-353, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Jianxi, 2012. "Second order asymptotics for ruin probabilities in a renewal risk model with heavy-tailed claims," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 422-429.
    2. Alex Huang, 2013. "Value at risk estimation by quantile regression and kernel estimator," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 225-251, August.
    3. Furrer, Hansjorg & Michna, Zbigniew & Weron, Aleksander, 1997. "Stable Lévy motion approximation in collective risk theory," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 97-114, September.
    4. Jeroen Rombouts & Marno Verbeek, 2009. "Evaluating portfolio Value-at-Risk using semi-parametric GARCH models," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(6), pages 737-745.
    5. Jianxi Lin, 2012. "Second order Subexponential Distributions with Finite Mean and Their Applications to Subordinated Distributions," Journal of Theoretical Probability, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 834-853, September.
    6. Grandell, Jan, 2000. "Simple approximations of ruin probabilities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(2-3), pages 157-173, May.
    7. Dingshi Tian & Zongwu Cai & Ying Fang, 2018. "Econometric Modeling of Risk Measures: A Selective Review of the Recent Literature," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 201807, University of Kansas, Department of Economics, revised Oct 2018.
    8. Rosen, Dan & Saunders, David, 2009. "Analytical methods for hedging systematic credit risk with linear factor portfolios," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 37-52, January.
    9. S. Pitts, 1994. "Nonparametric estimation of compound distributions with applications in insurance," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 46(3), pages 537-555, September.
    10. Dutang, C. & Lefèvre, C. & Loisel, S., 2013. "On an asymptotic rule A+B/u for ultimate ruin probabilities under dependence by mixing," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 774-785.
    11. Ceci, Vladimiro & Manganelli, Simone & Vecchiato, Walter, 2002. "Sensitivity analysis of volatility: a new tool for risk management," Working Paper Series 194, European Central Bank.
    12. Fermanian, Jean-David & Scaillet, Olivier, 2005. "Sensitivity analysis of VaR and Expected Shortfall for portfolios under netting agreements," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 927-958, April.
    13. Søren Asmussen & Jaakko Lehtomaa, 2017. "Distinguishing Log-Concavity from Heavy Tails," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-14, February.
    14. Humphery-Jenner, M., 2011. "Anti-takeover Provisions as a Source of Innovation and Value Creation," Discussion Paper 2011-045, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    15. Julien Trufin & Stéphane Loisel, 2013. "Ultimate ruin probability in discrete time with Bühlmann credibility premium adjustments," Post-Print hal-00426790, HAL.
    16. Young Kim & Rosella Giacometti & Svetlozar Rachev & Frank Fabozzi & Domenico Mignacca, 2012. "Measuring financial risk and portfolio optimization with a non-Gaussian multivariate model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 201(1), pages 325-343, December.
    17. Battulga Gankhuu, 2024. "Derivatives of Risk Measures," Papers 2404.09646, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
    18. repec:hal:wpaper:hal-00746251 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Yuen, Kam C. & Wang, Guojing & Ng, Kai W., 2004. "Ruin probabilities for a risk process with stochastic return on investments," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 110(2), pages 259-274, April.
    20. Susanne Emmer & Dirk Tasche, 2003. "Calculating credit risk capital charges with the one-factor model," Papers cond-mat/0302402, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2005.
    21. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Gatti, Stefano, 2013. "Risk analysis with contractual default. Does covenant breach matter?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(2), pages 431-443.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1203.2564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.