IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/utaeer/302908.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluating the Impact of Retaliatory Tariffs on U.S. Soybeans in China

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad, Andrew
  • Smith, S. Aaron

Abstract

On March 8, 2018, President Donald Trump signed proclamations to impose tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. The proclamations were based on a Department of Commerce report that indicated that the current level of aluminum and steel imports have the potential to threaten U.S. national security (White House, Office of the Press Secretary, 2018a; 2018b). On March 22, 2018, President Donald Trump also signed a memorandum to impose tariffs on Chinese goods of $50 billion, which was based on an investigation by the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative on China’s laws, policies and practices related to intellectual property rights, innovation and technology transfer (White House, Presidential Memorandum, 2018). The proposed steel and aluminum tariffs are based on Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (White House, Office of the Press Secretary, 2018a). The proposed $50 billion in tariffs on Chinese goods are based on Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, which gives the U.S. broad authority to respond to unfair trade practices (Leonard, 2018). Accordingly, the proposed tariffs are often referred to as 232 and 301 tariffs (we use this terminology in the report). The Chinese government responded to the 232 and 301 tariffs by threatening its own tariffs on U.S. goods, including soybeans (Caporal, 2018). Although, as of April 16, 2018, nothing has been implemented, concerns have been raised by the U.S. soybean industry about potential negative impacts (Huffstutter, 2018). If the Chinese government retaliates by imposing tariffs on U.S. soybeans, how could this impact U.S. soybean exports? In recent years, Brazil has significantly increased soybean exports to China. Could retaliatory tariffs against the U.S. result in gains for Brazil? Based on ongoing research of China’s soybean import market, we present findings of how retaliatory tariffs could impact U.S. and Brazilian soybean exports to China. This issue is particularly important because the U.S. soybean sector is very dependent on global markets, with China being the primary destination.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad, Andrew & Smith, S. Aaron, 2018. "Evaluating the Impact of Retaliatory Tariffs on U.S. Soybeans in China," Extension Reports 302908, University of Tennessee, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:utaeer:302908
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.302908
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/302908/files/TariffPUB.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.302908?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Morgan, Stephen & Arita, Shawn & Beckman, Jayson & Ahsan, Saquib & Russell, Dylan & Jarrell, Philip & Kenner, Bart, 2022. "The Economic Impacts of Retaliatory Tariffs on U.S. Agriculture," Economic Research Report 327180, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Valdes, Constanza & Gillespie, Jeffrey & Dohlman, Erik, 2023. "Soybean Production, Marketing Costs, and Export Competitiveness in Brazil and the United States," Economic Information Bulletin 340506, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:utaeer:302908. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dautkus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.