IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/umaesp/13876.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Farm Programs And The Environment: The Case For A Limited Land Payment

Author

Listed:
  • Peterson, Willis L.

Abstract

The results of estimating reduced form supply and input demand functions suggest that farm programs have increased the area planted to corn and soybeans in the corn belt by about 12 percent, and increased fertilizer and chemical use per acre by about 18 percent. It is argued that a limited land payment (LLP) program would be neutral in its effect on the environment while helping to preserve family farms and rural communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Peterson, Willis L., 1995. "Farm Programs And The Environment: The Case For A Limited Land Payment," Staff Papers 13876, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:umaesp:13876
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.13876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/13876/files/p95-05.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.13876?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wise, Sherry & Johnson, Stanley R. & Just, Richard E. & Bockstael, Nancy, 1991. "Commodity and Resource Policies in Agricultural Systems," Staff General Research Papers Archive 396, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Zeuli, Kimberly A. & Levins, Richard A., 1995. "Minnesota Agricultural Economist 682," Minnesota Applied Economist\Minnesota Agricultural Economist 13183, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    3. Chism, John W. & Levins, Richard A. & Honadle, Beth & Wang, Yin, 1994. "Minnesota Agricultural Economist no. 676," Minnesota Applied Economist\Minnesota Agricultural Economist 206493, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    4. Johnson, Stanley R. & Atwood, J. D. & Thompson, L., 1991. "Tradeoffs Between Agricultural and Chemical Policies," Staff General Research Papers Archive 365, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Foltz, Jeremy D. & Zeuli, Kimberly A., 2004. "Challenging the Goldschmidt Theory of Rural Purchasing Patterns," Staff Papers 12598, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    2. Kliebenstein, James B., 1995. "Fostering Sustainable Livestock Production: A Tool for Community Economic Development," ISU General Staff Papers 199507010700001267, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    3. D. Vermersch & F. Bonnieux & P. Rainelli, 1993. "Abatement of agricultural pollution and economic incentives: The case of intensive livestock farming in France," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 3(3), pages 285-296, June.
    4. Roe, Brian E. & Stockberger, Aaron, 2004. "Explaining Economic Linkages Between Farms And Local Communities: Looking Beyond Farm Size," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20208, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Jablonski, B.B.R. & Schmit, T.M., 2014. "‘Local’ Producers’ Production Functions and Their Importance in Estimating Economic Impacts," Working Papers 180117, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    6. Ravenswaay, Eileen O. van, 1993. "Linkages between Agricultural Marketing and Environmental Policies," Staff Paper Series 201168, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    7. Chichilnisky, Graciela, 1998. "The economics of global environmental risk," MPRA Paper 8812, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Elsa Martin & Hubert Stahn, 2013. "Potential Conflict and Inefficiencies Arising in Agri-environmental Management," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 423-445, June.
    9. Aillery, Marcel P., 1995. "Federal Commodity Programs and Returns to Irrigation in the West," Staff Reports 278778, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. Lynch, Sarah, 1994. "Designing Green Support Programs," Policy Studies Program Reports, Henry A. Wallace Institute for Alternative Agriculture, number 134111, January.
    11. Lazarus, William F. & Platas, Diego E. & Morse, George W., 2002. "IMPLAN's Weakest Link: Production Functions or Regional Purchase Coefficients?," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 32(1), pages 1-17.
    12. Atwood, Jay Dee & Hallam, Arne, 1990. "Farm Structure And Stewardship Of The Environment," 1990 Conference, January 6-9, Albuquerque, New Mexico 260176, Regional Research Committe NC-181: Determinants of Farm Size and Structure.
    13. Jeremy Foltz & Kimberly Zeuli, 2005. "The Role of Community and Farm Characteristics in Farm Input Purchasing Patterns," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 27(4), pages 508-525.
    14. Graciela Chichilnisky & Geoffrey Heal, 1993. "Global Environmental Risks," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 7(4), pages 65-86, Fall.
    15. Geoffrey Heal, 2017. "The Economics of the Climate," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 55(3), pages 1046-1063, September.
    16. Fidele Karamage & Chi Zhang & Felix Ndayisaba & Hua Shao & Alphonse Kayiranga & Xia Fang & Lamek Nahayo & Enan Muhire Nyesheja & Guangjin Tian, 2016. "Extent of Cropland and Related Soil Erosion Risk in Rwanda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-19, June.
    17. van Ravenswaay, Eileen, 1993. "Linkages Between Agricultural Marketing and Environmental Policies," Food and Agricultural Marketing Issues for the 21st Century - FAMC 1993 Conference 265922, Food and Agricultural Marketing Consortium (FAMC).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:umaesp:13876. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/daumnus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.