IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ufstcp/28068.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Conditions For Successful Land Reform In Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Groenewald, Jan A.

Abstract

Land reform has traditionally had two objectives: equity and productivity. Food insecurity and the need for agriculture to contribute to development emphasise the need to maintain and improve productivity while improving equitability. Land must foster production and agriculture must attract good human material. The main problem involves policy formulation and delivery Necessary conditions include: (1) A proper institutional framework involving all the relevant public and private bodies: the role and tasks of each should be clear, and also relationships between institutions. (2)Proper fiscal planning is essential. (3) Potentially successful farmers must be selected and given special support, including extension and adult education. Existing extension services are generally not adequate, particularly in the fields of finance and marketing. (4) Complementary services and infrastructure are needed in the form of improved access to financial services, markets and inputs and also improved transport, health, communications and other infrastructure. (5) As not all functions can be done at the same time, proper prioritising is needed to optimise the process. (6) Land tenure reform is usually necessary: property rights and security of tenure are at the core of the matter. International agricultural markets are very important: there is a need for wealthy nations to cease trade-distorting protection of their own farmers.

Suggested Citation

  • Groenewald, Jan A., 2003. "Conditions For Successful Land Reform In Africa," Conference Papers 28068, University of the Free State, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ufstcp:28068
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.28068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/28068/files/cp03gr01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.28068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vernon W. Ruttan, 1969. "Equity and Productivity Issues in Modern Agrarian Reform Legislation," International Economic Association Series, in: Ugo Papi & Charles Nunn (ed.), Economic Problems of Agriculture in Industrial Societies, chapter 0, pages 581-605, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Spio, Kojo & Groenewald, Jan A., 1997. "Rural Financial Markets: An Overview," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 36(2), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Machethe, C. L., 1990. "Factors Contributing To Poor Performance Of Agricultural Co-Operatives In Less Developed Areas," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 29(4), December.
    4. Jooste, Andre & Aliber, Michael & van Schalkwyk, Herman D., 1998. "Indirect Effects Of Different Agricultural Trade Scenarios: A South African Case Study," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 37(4), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Burger, P. J., 1971. "The Measurement of managerial inputs in agriculture III: the construction and evaluation of a scale," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 10(4), October.
    6. van Renen, E., 1997. "The Batat Marketing Drive: Improving Market Access For Small Scale Farmers," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 36(4), pages 1-8, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nomfundo Mabuza, Nosipho, 2016. "Socio-economic impact of land reform projects benefiting from the Recapitalisation and Development Programme in South Africa," Research Theses 243471, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johan van Zyl & Nick Vink & Johann Kirsten & Daneswan Poonyth, 2001. "South African agriculture in transition: the 1990s," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(6), pages 725-739.
    2. Ruttan, Vernon W., 2006. "Social science knowledge and induced institutional innovation: an institutional design perspective," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(3), pages 249-272, December.
    3. Tweeten, Luther, 1985. "Agricultural Structure in a Service Economy," 1985 Conference, August 26-September 4, 1985, Malaga, Spain 182617, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Nomfundo Mabuza, Nosipho, 2016. "Socio-economic impact of land reform projects benefiting from the Recapitalisation and Development Programme in South Africa," Research Theses 243471, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    5. Ruttan, Vernon W., 2002. "Social Science Knowledge And Institutional Innovation," Staff Papers 13628, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    6. Ortmann, Gerald F. & King, Robert P., 2006. "Small-Scale Farmers in South Africa: Can Agricultural Cooperatives Facilitate Access to Input and Product Markets?," Staff Papers 13930, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    7. Fekete, Ferenc & Fenyes, Tamas I. & Groenewald, Jan A., 1992. "Problems of Agricultural Restructuring in South Africa: Lessons from the Hungarian Experience," 1992 Occasional Paper Series No. 6 197880, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Wang, Lijia & Huo, Xuexi, 2013. "Member Willingness to Invest in Agricultural Cooperatives in Shaanxi Province, China," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 41(2), pages 1-24.
    9. Ortmann, Gerald F. & King, Robert P., 2007. "Agricultural cooperatives II: Can they facilitate access of small-scale farmers in South Africa to input and product markets?," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 46(2), pages 1-26, June.
    10. Zhu, Qianyu & Wachenheim, Cheryl J. & Ma, Zhiyao & Zhu, Cong, 2018. "Supply chain re-engineering: a case study of the Tonghui Agricultural Cooperative in Inner Mongolia," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(1).
    11. Zantsi, Siphe & Greyling, Jan C., 2021. "Land redistribution in South Africa’s land reform policy: a better way to select beneficiaries," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 60(2), April.
    12. M. Ghaffar Chaudhry & Ghulam Mustafa Chaudhry, 1997. "Pakistan’s Agricultural Development since Independence: Intertemporal Trends and Explanations," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 36(4), pages 593-612.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ufstcp:28068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dauovza.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.