IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/agreko/54899.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indirect Effects Of Different Agricultural Trade Scenarios: A South African Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Jooste, Andre
  • Aliber, Michael
  • van Schalkwyk, Herman D.

Abstract

One of the most important policy measures used by government to influence agricultural production and trade patterns are tariffs. A substantial depreciation in the exchange rate will not be enough to compensate for the negative effects of removing tariffs if the playing field is not level for producers in South Africa. Although the import multiplier show that less inputs will be imported, this saving on foreign exchange is not big enough to outweigh the total impact of imports on the balance of trade. The value-added multiplier clearly indicate that reinvestment and consumer spending (buying power) in agriculture will receive a severe blow. Employment will be reduced, thus increasing the supply of labour into other sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Jooste, Andre & Aliber, Michael & van Schalkwyk, Herman D., 1998. "Indirect Effects Of Different Agricultural Trade Scenarios: A South African Case Study," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 37(4), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:54899
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.54899
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/54899/files/27%20Jooste_%20Aliber%20_%20Van%20Schalkwyk%20-%20December%201998.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.54899?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Groenewald, Jan A., 2003. "Conditions For Successful Land Reform In Africa," Conference Papers 28068, University of the Free State, Department of Agricultural Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Relations/Trade;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:54899. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeasaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.