IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerssr/278539.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Computable General Equilibrium Modeling of Agricultural Policies: Documentation of the 30-Sector FPGE GAMS Model of the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Kilkenny, Maureen

Abstract

This paper explains how U.S. agricultural policies are modeled in the 30-sector computable general equilibrium (CGE) model of the United States called the FPGE GAMS model (Earm Policy in General Equilibrium, General Algebraic Modeling System). The main features of the FPGE GAMS model are (1) farm programs are modeled explicitly rather than by using ad valorem equivalents; (2) every dollar spent and received under farm programs is accounted for; and (3) the facts that farm households earn nonfarm income and nonfarm households own farmland is made explicit. Policy modeling issues are discussed. There is a detailed explanation of the equations representing farm programs, spending, and program effects. Data sources and methods of calibration and parameterization are explained. A social accounting matrix (SAM) of the United States highlighting farm program expenditures and receipts is included.

Suggested Citation

  • Kilkenny, Maureen, 1991. "Computable General Equilibrium Modeling of Agricultural Policies: Documentation of the 30-Sector FPGE GAMS Model of the United States," Staff Reports 278539, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278539
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.278539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/278539/files/ers-report-522.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.278539?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rausser, Gordon C. & Wright, Brian D, 1987. "Alternative strategies for trade policy reform," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt2vr4399k, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    2. Thomas W. Hertel & Marinos E. Tsigas, 1988. "Tax Policy and U.S. Agriculture: A General Equilibrium Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 70(2), pages 289-302.
    3. Bradley J. McDonald, 1990. "Agricultural Negotiations in the Uruguay Round," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(3), pages 299-327, September.
    4. Jean-Marc Burniaux & François Delorme & Ian Lienert & John P. Martin & Peter Hoeller, 1988. "Quantifying the Economy-Wide Effects of Agricultural Policies: A General Equilibrium Approach," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 55, OECD Publishing.
    5. Whalley, John & Yeung, Bernard, 1984. "External sector closing rules in applied general equilibrium models," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1-2), pages 123-138, February.
    6. Bhagwati, Jagdish N. & Srinivasan, T. N., 1973. "The general equilibrium theory of effective protection and resource allocation," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 259-281, August.
    7. Julian M. Alston & Colin A. Carter & Richard Green & Daniel Pick, 1990. "Whither Armington Trade Models?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 72(2), pages 455-467.
    8. Bradley J. McDonald, 1990. "Agricultural Negotiations in the Uruguay Round," NBER Chapters, in: New Issues in the Uruguay Round, pages 299-327, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Salathe, Larry E. & Price, J. Michael & Gadson, Kenneth E., 1982. "The Food and Agricultural Policy Simulator," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 34(2), pages 1-15, April.
    10. Randall A. Kramer & Rulon D. Pope, 1981. "Participation in Farm Commodity Programs: A Stochastic Dominance Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 63(1), pages 119-128.
    11. Kennedy, Joseph V., 1987. "Generic Commodity Certificates: How They Affect Markets and the Federal Budget," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 2(3), pages 1-4.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robinson, Sherman & Kilkenny, Maureen & Adelman, Irma, 1988. "The Effect of Trade Liberalization in Agriculture on the U.S. Economy to 1991," CUDARE Working Papers 198475, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    2. Kilkenny, Maureen, 1991. "The "30-30-30 Proposal": CGE Simulation of Unilateral Compliance by the USA to Partial Trade Liberalization," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271354, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Johnson, James & Clayton, Kenneth, 1982. "Organization And Well-Being Of The Farming Industry: Reflectlions 7:1":%82 Agriculture And Food Act Of 1981," 1982 Annual Meeting, August 1-4, Logan, Utah 279424, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Porter, Jane M. & Bowers, Douglas E., 1989. "A Short History Of U.S. Agricultural Trade Negotiations," Staff Reports 278842, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Agriculture and Trade Analysis Division, 1988. "Agriculture In The Uruguay Round: Analyses Of Government Support," Staff Reports 278064, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Hertel, Thomas W., 1991. "Applied General Equilibrium Analysis of Agricultural Policies," Staff Papers 200396, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    7. Robinson, Sherman, 1990. "Analyzing Agricultural Trade Liberalization with Single-Country Computable General Equilibrium Models," CUDARE Working Papers 198502, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    8. Schwartz, Nancy E. & Parker, Stephen, 1988. "Measuring Government Intervention In Agriculture For The Gatt Negotiations," 1988 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Knoxville, Tennessee 270318, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Roningen, Vernon O. & Dixit, Praveen M., 1989. "How Level is the Playing Field? An Economic Analysis of Agricultural Policy Reforms in Industrial Market Economies," Foreign Agricultural Economic Report (FAER) 147993, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. Geoff Edwards, 1987. "U.S. farm policy: an Australian perspective," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue Oct.
    11. Aradhyula, Satheesh Venkata, 1989. "Policy structure, output supply and input demand for US crops," ISU General Staff Papers 198901010800009909, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    12. Hoffman, Linwood A. & Livezey, Janet, 1987. "The U.S. Oats Industry," Agricultural Economic Reports 305462, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    13. Yu, Wusheng & Hertel, Thomas W. & Preckel, Paul V. & Eales, James S., 2004. "Projecting world food demand using alternative demand systems," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 99-129, January.
    14. Ashok Mishra & Barry Goodwin, 2006. "Revenue insurance purchase decisions of farmers," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 149-159.
    15. Peters, Glen, 2008. "Reassessing Carbon Leakage," Conference papers 331753, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    16. William T. McSweeny & David E. Kenyon & Randall A. Kramer, 1987. "Toward an Appropriate Measure of Uncertainty in a Risk Programming Model," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(1), pages 87-96.
    17. Löschel, Andreas & Alexeeva-Talebi, Victoria & Mennel, Tim, 2008. "Climate Policy and the Problem of Competitiveness: Border Tax Adjustments or Integrated Emission Trading?," ZEW Discussion Papers 08-061, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    18. Hertel, Thomas W. & Tyner, Wallace E. & Birur, Dileep K., 2008. "Biofuels for all? Understanding the Global Impacts of Multinational Mandates," 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida 6526, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. Ribaudo, Marc & Heimlich, Ralph E. & Peters, Mark, 1998. "Nitrogen Sources And Gulf Hypoxia: Potential For Point-Nonpoint Trading," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20796, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    20. Janda, Karel & Rausser, Gordon C. & McCluskey, Jill, 1998. "Food import demand in the Czech Republic," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt14j5p75j, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.