IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerssr/278357.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

U.S. Milk Markets Under Alternative Federal Order Pricing Policies

Author

Listed:
  • McDowell, Howard
  • Fleming, Ann
  • Spinelli, Felix

Abstract

Federal milk marketing orders regulate about 80 percent of the Grade A milk marketed and about 70 percent of all milk marketed in the United States. The orders regulate fluid milk markets through classified pricing and pooling of revenues, and affect consumer and producer milk prices, interregional marketing patterns, and U.S. Government purchases of surplus dairy products. This study compares the U.S. milk markets under 1988 provisions against three alternative policies using an interregional trade model comprising 15 regions. The three policies--minimal regulation, multiple-base pricing, and multiple-base pricing with reconstitution--allow market forces to have greater effect on prices and marketing patterns. Minimal regulation allows market conditions to determine any Grade A price differential above manufacturing milk prices. Multiple-base pricing replaces the single-base (central Wisconsin) with price basing in all regions with sufficient fluid milk supplies. Reconstitution is simulated by modifying multiple-base pricing with the possibility of shipping fresh milk concentrates for reconstituting into fresh fluid products without penalty.

Suggested Citation

  • McDowell, Howard & Fleming, Ann & Spinelli, Felix, 1990. "U.S. Milk Markets Under Alternative Federal Order Pricing Policies," Staff Reports 278357, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278357
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.278357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/278357/files/ers-report-492.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.278357?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henry W. Kinnucan & Olan D. Forker, 1987. "Asymmetry in Farm-Retail Price Transmission for Major Dairy Products," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(2), pages 285-292.
    2. Ippolito, Richard A & Masson, Robert T, 1978. "The Social Cost of Government Regulation of Milk," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 21(1), pages 33-65, April.
    3. Buxton, Boyd M., 1985. "Factors Affecting U.S. Milk Production," Agricultural Economic Reports 307971, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Schiek, William A. & Babb, Emerson M., 1989. "Impact of Reverse Osmosis on Southeast Milk Markets," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 63-75, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tsunemasa Kawaguchi & Nobuhiro Suzuki & Harry M. Kaiser, 2001. "Evaluating class I differentials in the new federal milk marketing order system," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(4), pages 527-538.
    2. Cox, Thomas L. & Chavas, Jean-Paul & Jesse, Edward V., 1994. "Regional Impacts of Reducing Dairy Price Supports and Removing Milk Marketing Orders in the U.S. Dairy Sector," Staff Papers 200580, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    3. Jean‐Paul Chavas & Thomas L. Cox & Edward Jesse, 1998. "Spatial allocation and the shadow pricing of product characteristics," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 18(1), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Kawaguchi, Tsunemasa & Suzuki, Nobuhiro & Kaiser, Harry M., 1997. "Impact of Federal Marketing Orders on the Structure of Milk Markets in the United States," Research Bulletins 122809, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    5. Chavas, Jean-Paul & Cox, Thomas L. & Jesse, Edward V., 1993. "Spatial Hedonic Pricing and Trade," Staff Papers 200574, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    6. Lopez, Rigoberto A. & Altobello, Marilyn A. & Shah, Farhed A., 1994. "Amenity Benefits and Public Policy: An Application to the Connecticut Dairy Sector," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(2), pages 485-496, December.
    7. Schiek, William A., 1994. "Regional Impacts Of Federal Milk Marketing Order Policy Alternatives," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 23(2), pages 1-11, October.
    8. Suzuki, Nobuhiro & Kaiser, Harry M. & Lenz, John E. & Forker, Olan D., 1994. "An Analysis of U.S. Dairy Policy Deregulation using an Imperfect Competition Model," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 84-93, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nubern, Chris A. & Purcell, Wayne D., 1997. "Competitiveness of Dairy Producers in a Deregulated Market," Staff Papers 232553, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    2. Ronald Cotterill & Leonard Egan & William Buckhold, 2001. "Beyond Illinois Brick: The Law and Economics of Cost Pass-Through in the ADM Price Fixing Case," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 18(1), pages 45-52, February.
    3. Li, Chenguang & Sexton, Richard J., 2009. "Impacts of Retailers’ Pricing Strategies for Produce Commodities on Farmer Welfare," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 51720, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Richard J. Sexton & Catherine L. Kling & Hoy F. Carman, 1991. "Market Integration, Efficiency of Arbitrage, and Imperfect Competition: Methodology and Application to U.S. Celery," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 73(3), pages 568-580.
    5. Lence, Sergio H.(Sergio Horacio), 1988. "Transfer costs in agricultural trade: implications for empirical research," ISU General Staff Papers 1988010108000017599, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    6. Rabinowitz, Adam & Liu, Yizao & Chen, Xuan, 2016. "The Impact of Price Regulations on Farm-Retail Price Transmission: The Case of Fluid Milk," 2016 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2016, San Antonio, Texas 230095, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    7. Rezitis Anthony N. & Rokopanos Andreas, 2019. "Asymmetric Price Transmission along the European Food Supply Chain and the CAP Health Check: a Panel Vector Error Correction Approach," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 17(2), pages 1-20, November.
    8. Holloway, Garth J. & Hertel, Thomas W., 1991. "Comparing Hypotheses About Competition," Working Papers 225867, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    9. Richards, Timothy J. & Patterson, Paul M., 2000. "New Varieties And The Returns To Commodity Promotion: The Case Of Fuji Apples," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 29(1), pages 1-14, April.
    10. Kinnucan, Henry W. & Belleza, Evelyn T., 1995. "Price And Quantity Effects Of Canada'S Dairy Adverstising Programs," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 24(2), pages 1-12, October.
    11. Daniel A. Sumner & Tom Cox, 1998. "Fair Dairy Policy," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 16(1), pages 58-68, January.
    12. Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Andrew M. McKenzie & Ismat Ara Begum & Jeroen Buysse & Eric J. Wailes & Guido Huylenbroeck, 2016. "Asymmetry Price Transmission in the Deregulated Rice Markets in Bangladesh: Asymmetric Error Correction Model," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 498-511, November.
    13. Teresa Serra & Barry Goodwin, 2003. "Price transmission and asymmetric adjustment in the Spanish dairy sector," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(18), pages 1889-1899.
    14. Aysoy, Cevriye & Kirli, Duygu Halim & Tumen, Semih, 2015. "How does a shorter supply chain affect pricing of fresh food? Evidence from a natural experiment," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 104-113.
    15. Hayley H. Chouinard & David E. Davis & Jeffrey T. LaFrance & Jeffrey M. Perloff, 2010. "Milk Marketing Order Winners and Losers," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 32(1), pages 59-76.
    16. Jung, Hanjoon Michael, 2011. "A Simple Model of Dairy Product Supply," MPRA Paper 29653, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Bittmann, Thomas & Holzer, Patrick & Loy, Jens-Peter, 2016. "Seasonal Cost Pass-Through In The German Milk Market," 56th Annual Conference, Bonn, Germany, September 28-30, 2016 244779, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    18. Pozo, Veronica F. & Bejan, Vladimir & Bachmeier, Lance, 2017. "Are Price Transmissions between U.S. Energy and Corn Markets Asymmetric?," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258232, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Hanjoon M. Jung & Abid A Burki & Mushtaq A Khan, 2012. "Supply of Dairy Products in Developing Countries," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 32(4), pages 3213-3223.
    20. Li, Xi-Le & Saghaian, Sayed, 2014. "The Presence Of Market Power In The Coffee Market: The Case Of Colombian Milds," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170348, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Livestock Production/Industries; Marketing;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.