IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerser/307580.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic Impact of Water Pollution Control Regulations on the Tomato Processing Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Emerson, Peter M

Abstract

The economic impact of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 on the tomato processing industry is examined. The 1972 Act calls for uniform effluent limitations, and requires that municipalities establish pretreatment standards for waste and recover a proportionate share of capital and operating costs from industrial users. Tomato processors generate a highly seasonal, large-volume, biogradable waste load, characterized by substantial variations in volume and composition among processing plants and throughout the processing season. Municipal treatment, spray irrigation, and evaporation-percolation ponds are the preferred means of pollution abatement. Water pollution control regulations are expected to speed the decline of the tomato processing industry in the East and Midwest as many small plants close. In California the number of large-volume plants may increase slightly. Prices of processed tomato products are expected to rise 1.0 to 4.2 percent per year due to pollution control costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Emerson, Peter M, 1976. "Economic Impact of Water Pollution Control Regulations on the Tomato Processing Industry," Agricultural Economic Reports 307580, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerser:307580
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.307580
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/307580/files/aer334.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.307580?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emerson, Peter M., 1974. "Historical Guide to Federal Water Pollution Control Laws Affecting Food Processing," Miscellaneous Publications 324834, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Headley, J. Charles, 1972. "Agricultural Productivity, Technology and Environmental Quality," 1972 Annual Meeting, August 20-23, Gainesville, Florida 337291, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Jacob L. Mosak, 1938. "Interrelations of Production, Price, and Derived Demand," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 46(6), pages 761-761.
    4. Kneese, Allen V, 1971. "Environmental Pollution: Economics and Policy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 61(2), pages 153-166, May.
    5. J. Charles Headley, 1972. "Agricultural Productivity, Technology, and Environmental Quality," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 54(5), pages 749-756.
    6. Edwards, Clark & Coltrane, Robert & Daberkow, Stan, 1971. "Regional Variations in Economic Growth and Development with Emphasis on Rural Areas," Agricultural Economic Reports 307440, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Mighell, Ronald L. & Hoofnagle, William S., 1972. "Contract Production and Vertical Integration in Farming, 1960 and 1970," Miscellaneous Publications 324003, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    8. d'Arge, Ralph C. & Kneese, Allen V., 1972. "Environmental Quality and International Trade," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(2), pages 419-465, April.
    9. Clark Edwards, 1959. "Resource Fixity and Farm Organization," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 41(4), pages 747-759.
    10. Langham, Max R., 1971. "A Theoretical Framework for Viewing Pollution Problems," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(1), pages 1-8, December.
    11. Ruff, Larry E, 1972. "A Note on Pollution Prices in a General Equilibrium Model," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 62(1), pages 186-192, March.
    12. Langham, Max R., 1971. "A Theoretical Framework For Viewing Pollution Problems," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 3(1), pages 1-8, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brandt, Jon A. & French, Ben C., 1981. "An Analysis of Economic Relationships and Projected Adjustments in the U.S. Processing Tomato Industry," Research Reports 251943, University of California, Davis, Giannini Foundation.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Musser, Wesley N., 1979. "Discussion: Non-Point Source Pollution Abatement—Potential Impact and Research Needs," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 11-15, December.
    2. Throsby, C.D., 1973. "New Methodologies in Agricultural Production Economics: a Review," 1973 Conference, August 19-30, 1973, São Paulo, Brazil 181385, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Johnson, Ruth C. & McManus, B.R., 1979. "A Theoretical Framework For Analyzing Social Costs Of The Tobacco Program," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 11(2), pages 1-4, December.
    4. Clark, Richard T., 1972. "Pollution Control Policy Effects on Irrigated Farms," WAEA/ WFEA Conference Archive (1929-1995) 323765, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    5. Lasley, Floyd A. & Henson, William L. & Jones, Harold B., Jr., 1985. "The U.S. Turkey Industry," Agricultural Economic Reports 305705, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Peter Kort & Paul Loon & Mikulás Luptácik, 1991. "Optimal dynamic environmental policies of a profit maximizing firm," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 195-225, October.
    7. Capps, Oral, Jr. & Havlicek, Joseph, Jr., 1978. "The Demand For Gasoline And Diesel Fuel In Agricultural Use In Virginia," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(1), pages 1-6, July.
    8. Jean-Sébastien Lenfant, 2006. "Complementarity and Demand Theory: From the 1920s to the 1940s," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 38(5), pages 48-85, Supplemen.
    9. Alberto Behar, 2004. "Estimates of labour demand elasticities and elasticities of substitution using firm-level manufacturing data," SALDRU/CSSR Working Papers 098, Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town.
    10. Zhang, Mingxia & Sexton, Richard J., 2000. "Captive Supplies And The Cash Market Price: A Spatial Markets Approach," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 25(1), pages 1-21, July.
    11. William E. Foster & Gordon C. Rausser, 1991. "Farmer Behavior under Risk of Failure," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 73(2), pages 276-288.
    12. Blandford, David & Boisvert, Richard N., 2004. "U.S. Policy for Agricultural Adjustment," IAPRAP\IATRC Summer Symposium, Adjusting to Domestic and International Agricultural Reform in Industrial Countries, June 6-7, 2004, Philadelphia, PA, 15771, International Agricultural Policy Reform and Adjustment Project (IAPRAP).
    13. Archibald, Sandra O. & McCorkle, Chester O. Jr & Howitt, Richard E., 1986. "A Dynamic Analysis Of Production Externalities : Pesticide Resistance In California Cotton," Working Papers 225802, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    14. Vernon W. Ruttan, 1971. "Technology and the Environment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 53(5), pages 707-717.
    15. Smith, Blair J. & Parvin, David W., Jr., 1975. "Estimating The Relative Rurality Of U.S. Counties," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 7(2), pages 1-10, December.
    16. Taylor, Timothy G. & Kalaitzandonakes, Nicholas G., 1990. "A Test Of Asset Fixity In Southeastern U.S. Agriculture," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(1), pages 1-7, July.
    17. Charles, Vincent & Kumar, Mukesh & Irene Kavitha, S., 2012. "Measuring the efficiency of assembled printed circuit boards with undesirable outputs using data envelopment analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 194-206.
    18. Ma, Tao & Li, Bo & Fang, Changming & Zhao, Bin & Luo, Yiqi & Chen, Jiakuan, 2006. "Analysis of physical flows in primary commodity trade: A case study in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 73-81.
    19. Lynne, Gary D., 1978. "Issues And Problems In Agricultural Water Demand Estimation From Secondary Data Sources," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(2), pages 1-6, December.
    20. Vanegas WM., 1980. "United States' environmental measures: economic implications with regard to colombian income, trade and employment," ILO Working Papers 992100943402676, International Labour Organization.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerser:307580. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.