IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerscs/329532.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparing Estimates of Market and Nonmarket Values for Products of a Given Land Base

Author

Listed:
  • Martin, William E.
  • Tinney, J. Craig
  • Gum, Russell L.

Abstract

Excerpts from the report: The purpose is to generate comparable values of a land resource used in two potentially conflicting production activities—cattle ranching and hunting. Since the transformation function for the two products from the given resource remains unsolved, the purpose of the paper is not to prescribe the optimum combination of products to produce, but rather to describe the values of the two activities in an "as is" situation to the consumers of the activities. Such information should prove useful to policymakers in terms of specifying the magnitude of the potential conflict among users of the land resource. Arizona is the land base under study. The question of comparable values for cattle ranching and rural outdoor recreation on a given land base is of particular interest in Arizona where so much of the state is under public ownership and is to be managed for the public good. Only 17.6 percent of Arizona lands are in private ownership. Federal and state agencies which have a management interest in the public lands include the U.S. Forest Service, the Bureau of Land Management, the National Park Service, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, the Arizona State Land Department and the Arizona Department of Game and Fish. Of major interest in each of these agencies is the level at which cattle grazing should be allowed, the level at which game species should be encouraged, and the access that should be allowed to the public for hunting and other recreational activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin, William E. & Tinney, J. Craig & Gum, Russell L., 1978. "Comparing Estimates of Market and Nonmarket Values for Products of a Given Land Base," Economics Statistics and Cooperative Services (ESCS) Reports 329532, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerscs:329532
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.329532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/329532/files/NREDwp44-ESCS.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.329532?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arthur H. Smith & William E. Martin, 1972. "Socioeconomic Behavior of Cattle Ranchers, with Implications for Rural Community Development in the West," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 54(2), pages 217-225.
    2. Randall, Alan, 1977. "Evaluating Non-Market Goods And Services: Some Conceptual Considerations," Staff Papers 292745, University of Kentucky, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    3. Currie, John Martin & Murphy, John A & Schmitz, Andrew, 1971. "The Concept of Economic Surplus and its Use in Economic Analysis," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 81(324), pages 741-799, December.
    4. James P. Houck, 1965. "The Relationship of Direct Price Flexibilities to Direct Price Elasticities," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 47(3), pages 789-792.
    5. William E. Martin & Gene L. Jefferies, 1966. "Relating Ranch Prices and Grazing Permit Values to Ranch Productivity," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 48(2), pages 233-242.
    6. Willig, Robert D, 1976. "Consumer's Surplus without Apology," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 66(4), pages 589-597, September.
    7. Russell L. Gum & William E. Martin, 1975. "Problems and Solutions in Estimating the Demand for and Value of Rural Outdoor Recreation," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 57(4), pages 558-566.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin, William E. & Tinney, J. Craig & Gum, Russell L., 1978. "A Welfare Economic Analysis Of The Potential Competition Between Hunting And Cattle Ranching," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 3(2), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Pope, C. Arden, III & Stoll, John R., 1985. "The Market Value Of Ingress Rights For White-Tailed Deer Hunting In Texas," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(1), pages 1-6, July.
    3. Jose L. Oviedo & Lynn Huntsinger & Pablo Campos & Alejandro Caparrós, 2011. "Assessing the income value of private amenities in California oak woodlands," Working Papers 1110, Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (IPP), CSIC.
    4. Bouwes, Nicholaas W., Sr. & Schneider, Robert R., 1978. "Estimating Water Quality Benefits," Economics Statistics and Cooperative Services (ESCS) Reports 329652, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Firici, M. Carmen & Thomson, Kenneth J., 2002. "Distributional Impacts of CAP Adoption on Romanian Households," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24818, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. José L Oviedo & Pablo Campos & Alejandro Caparrós, 2022. "Contingent valuation of landowner demand for forest amenities: application in Andalusia, Spain," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 49(3), pages 615-643.
    7. Hubbard, Carmen & Thomson, Kenneth J., 2007. "Romania's accession to the EU: Short-term welfare effects on food consumers," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 128-140, February.
    8. Louis Mahé, 1977. "Le coût des fluctuations cycliques agricoles pour la collectivité," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 28(6), pages 974-1004.
    9. Forbush, Marie Leigh & Gum, Russell & Mertin, William E. & Cory, Dennis & Weisz, Reuben N. & Teigen, Llyod, 1980. "Impacts On Consumers: Welfare Economics In The Multiproduct Case," Economics Statistics and Cooperative Services (ESCS) Reports 279727, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. Phaneuf, Daniel J. & Smith, V. Kerry, 2006. "Recreation Demand Models," Handbook of Environmental Economics, in: K. G. Mäler & J. R. Vincent (ed.), Handbook of Environmental Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 15, pages 671-761, Elsevier.
    11. Slemrod, Joel & Yitzhaki, Shlomo, 2001. "Integrating Expenditure and Tax Decisions: The Marginal Cost of Funds and the Marginal Benefit of Projects," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 54(2), pages 189-202, June.
    12. Lisa A. Robinson & James K. Hammitt, 2011. "Behavioral Economics and Regulatory Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(9), pages 1408-1422, September.
    13. Miles Cahill & George Kosicki, 2000. "Exploring Economic Models Using Excel," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(3), pages 770-792, January.
    14. Parry, Ian W.H., 2008. "How should heavy-duty trucks be taxed?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 651-668, March.
    15. Miller, Stephen E. & Kahl, Kandice H. & Rathwell, P. James, 2000. "Revenue Insurance For Georgia And South Carolina Peaches," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 32(1), pages 1-10, April.
    16. Kilmer, Richard L. & Armbruster, Walter J., 1984. "Methods For Evaluating Economic Efficiency In Agricultural Marketing," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9, July.
    17. Eva Vicente & Pablo de Frutos, 2011. "Application of the travel cost method to estimate the economic value of cultural goods: Blockbuster art exhibitions," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 196(1), pages 37-63, january.
    18. Yoshitsugu Kanemoto, 2011. "Surplus Theory," Chapters, in: André de Palma & Robin Lindsey & Emile Quinet & Roger Vickerman (ed.), A Handbook of Transport Economics, chapter 20, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Rolfe, John & Prayaga, Prabha, 2006. "Estimating Values for Recreational Fishing at Freshwater Dams in Queensland," 2006 Conference (50th), February 8-10, 2006, Sydney, Australia 139896, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    20. Richard Pomfret, 1978. "The economic consequences for Israel of free trade in manufactured goods with the EEC," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 114(3), pages 526-539, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerscs:329532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.