IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/sbrfsr/109705.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Análise Da Cadeia Produtiva Da Caprino-Ovinocultura Em Garanhuns

Author

Listed:
  • Carvalho, Daniela Moreira de
  • Souza, Jalmir Pinheiro De

Abstract

A caprino-ovinocultura na região Nordeste tem grande importância tanto econômica quanto social, devido ao fato dos animais terem uma boa adaptação ao clima e a alimentação, muitas vezes escassa, disponível na região. A compreensão das cadeias produtivas locais permite a proposição de melhorias no setor a fim de torná-lo mais eficiente. Na caprino-ovinocultura a eficiência ocorre através da oferta aos consumidores de carnes de melhor qualidade, animais jovens, constância de oferta, segurança alimentar e preços competitivos. O resultado da eficiência do sistema produtivo seria de uma maior rentabilidade, uma inserção em novos mercados, ou seja, numa maior competitividade de todo setor. Nesse sentido objetivou-se realizar uma análise descritiva da cadeia produtiva da caprino-ovinocultura no município de Garanhuns com observância nos aspectos relacionados a estrutura de governança e grau de simetria de informação para a proposição de arranjos de maior coordenação da cadeia. Concluiu-se que em Garanhuns a cadeia produtiva da caprino-ovinocultura tem uma série de problemas devido, especialmente, à falta de comunicação e articulação entre os elos da cadeia, os produtores rurais desconhecem o destino final das carnes, desconhecem os interesses do consumidor final e não vêem a necessidade de se inteirar dessas informações. Apesar de culturalmente muito aceita, na região, a carne de caprinos e ovinos, verifica-se dificuldade em possível ampliação de oferta para mercados mais exigentes e distantes, devido à baixa qualidade, descontinuidade de oferta e reduzido mix de produtos. A assimetria de informações e a ineficácia da fiscalização sanitária inviabilizam a eficiência da cadeia no município, dificultando a melhor adequação do produto ao consumidor final o que gera perdas que são distribuídas ao longo da cadeia, especialmente, aos produtores que tem o menor nível de informação do setor.----------------------------------------------The sheep and goat farming in Northeast Brazil plays an important role for economical and social reasons due to the good adaptation of the cattle to environmental conditions and food offer, most of the time scarce and not plenty available in the Region. By understanding the local productive chains, farmers would able to implement structural improvements in order to make the production process more efficient. In sheep and goat farming business, efficiency is more visible as consumers of meat and dairy products are offered better quality items, constant supply, food safety programs and competitive prices. The productive system results would be even more profitable with new markets shares and competitive production process. This study aims to describe on analytical basis the productive chain of the sheep and goat farming in Garanhuns, Pernambuco, Brazil, observing crucial aspects related to governance structure and information interchange system in order to propose important arrangements for the productive chain. In Garanhuns, the sheep and goat farming business presents a couple of problems, especially lack of communication and articulation between the involved parts of the production chain. Other important problem is that local farmers neither know the market and consumer's interests nor think it is important to know something more on the business. Despite being very popular among local population, sheep and goat meat faces market problems due to the low-level quality control, discontinued supply, and reduced offer of products. Lack of reliable data and inefficient sanitary inspections make the business unprofitable, unviable and unsustainable. These factors combined cause economic and social losses distributed along the whole production chain. Small producers' losses are particularly more important because they don't have access to data and information of the entire productive chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Carvalho, Daniela Moreira de & Souza, Jalmir Pinheiro De, 2008. "Análise Da Cadeia Produtiva Da Caprino-Ovinocultura Em Garanhuns," 46th Congress, July 20-23, 2008, Rio Branco, Acre, Brazil 109705, Sociedade Brasileira de Economia, Administracao e Sociologia Rural (SOBER).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:sbrfsr:109705
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.109705
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/109705/files/673.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.109705?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zylbersztajn, Decio & Farina, Elizabeth Maria Mercier Querido, 1999. "Strictly Coordinated Food-Systems: Exploring The Limits Of The Coasian Firm," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 2(2), pages 1-17.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. da Costa Lima Pires, Pâmela & da Silva César, Aldara & Cardoso, Alexandre Nunes & Favaro, Simone Palma & Conejero, Marco Antonio, 2023. "Strategies to improve the competitiveness of an agroindustrial system for a macauba based oil production in Minas Gerais State, Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    2. Y. Mainville, Denise & Reardon, Thomas, 2007. "Supermarket market-channel participation and technology decisions of horticultural producers in Brazil," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 45(3), January.
    3. Martins, Franco Müller & Trienekens, Jacques & Omta, Onno, 2021. "Impact of buyers' support on farmer performance and investments in the Brazilian pork supply chain," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 25(1), July.
    4. Bruno V. Miranda & Brent Ross & Jason Franken & Miguel Gómez, 2022. "Plural forms and differentiation strategies in the agri‐food sector: Evidence from the U.S. wine industry," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(3), pages 486-504, July.
    5. Mainville, Denise Y. & Zylbersztajn, Decio & Farina, Elizabeth M.M.Q. & Reardon, Thomas, 2005. "Determinants of retailers' decisions to use public or private grades and standards: Evidence from the fresh produce market of Sao Paulo, Brazil," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 334-353, June.
    6. Lemos, Fernanda K. & Zylbersztajn, Decio, 2017. "International Demand Shaping Governance Mechanisms in Brazilian Beef Agri-Systems: The Case of the Three Main Processors," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 2017(1), June.
    7. Rezende, Christiane Leles & Zylbersztajn, Decio, 2012. "Pacta Sunt Servanda Versus the Social Role of Contracts: the case of Brazilian agriculture contracts," Brazilian Journal of Rural Economy and Sociology (Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural-RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 50(3), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Lemos, Fernanda K. & Zylbersztajn, Decio, 2017. "International Demand Shaping Governance Mechanisms in Brazilian Beef Agri-Systems: The Case of the Three Main Processors," 2018 International European Forum (163rd EAAE Seminar), February 5-9, 2018, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 276899, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    9. Rezende, Christiane Leles & Zylbersztajn, Decio, 2012. "Pacta Sunt Servanda Versus the Social Role of Contracts: the case of Brazilian agriculture contracts," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 50(2), January.
    10. Luis Otavio Bau Macedo, 2017. "Veblen’s Institutional Approach and Agribusiness Coordination," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(2), pages 124-134, February.
    11. Gagalyuk, Taras, 2012. "Goal achievement in supply chain networks: A study of the Ukrainian agri-food business," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 64, number 64.
    12. Weseen, Simon & Hobbs, Jill & Kerr, William A., 2014. "Reducing Hold-up Risks in Ethanol Supply Chains: A Transaction Cost Perspective," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 17(2), pages 1-24, May.
    13. Lemos, Fernanda Kesrouani & Castro, Luciana de Paula, 2021. "Food Retail as the Coordinator Agent of Food Supply Chain: Challenges and Opportunities for Reducing Loss and Waste," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 12(03), September.
    14. Martins, Franco M. & Trienekens, Jacques & Omta, Onno, 2017. "Governance structures and coordination mechanisms in the Brazilian pork chain – Diversity of arrangements to support the supply of piglets," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 20(4), March.
    15. Miranda, Bruno Varella & Monteiro, Guilherme Fowler A. & Rodrigues, Vinicius Picanço, 2021. "Circular agri-food systems: A governance perspective for the analysis of sustainable agri-food value chains," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    16. Watanabe, Kassia & Zylbersztajn, Decio, 2013. "Building Supply Systems from Scratch: The Case of the Castor Bean for Biodiesel Chain in Minas Gerais, Brazil," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 3(2), pages 1-14, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Livestock Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:sbrfsr:109705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/soberea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.