IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/rutfwp/310308.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Consumer Responses to Food Recalls: 2008 National Survey Report

Author

Listed:
  • Hallman, William K.
  • Cuite, Cara L.
  • Hooker, Neal H.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Hallman, William K. & Cuite, Cara L. & Hooker, Neal H., 2009. "Consumer Responses to Food Recalls: 2008 National Survey Report," Research Reports 310308, Rutgers University, Food Policy Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:rutfwp:310308
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.310308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/310308/files/RR-0109-018.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.310308?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cuite, Cara L. & Condry, Sarah C. & Nucci, Mary L. & Hallman, William K., 2007. "Public Response to the Contaminated Spinach Recall of 2006," Research Reports 310304, Rutgers University, Food Policy Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gülbanu Kaptan & Arnout R.H. Fischer & Lynn J. Frewer, 2018. "Extrapolating understanding of food risk perceptions to emerging food safety cases," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(8), pages 996-1018, August.
    2. Chuanhui Liao & Huang Yu & Weiwei Zhu, 2020. "Perceived Knowledge, Coping Efficacy and Consumer Consumption Changes in Response to Food Recall," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Hall, David C. & Johnson-Hall, Tracy D., 2021. "Recall effectiveness, strategy, and task complexity in the U.S. meat and poultry industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    4. Chuanhui Liao & Xiaomei Zhou & Dingtao Zhao, 2018. "An Augmented Risk Information Seeking Model: Perceived Food Safety Risk Related to Food Recalls," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Just, David R. & Wansink, Brian & Turvey, Calum G., 2009. "Biosecurity, Terrorism, and Food Consumption Behavior: Using Experimental Psychology to Analyze Choices Involving Fear," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 34(1), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Carlos Arnade & Linda Calvin & Fred Kuchler, 2009. "Consumer Response to a Food Safety Shock: The 2006 Food-Borne Illness Outbreak of E. coli O157: H7 Linked to Spinach," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 31(4), pages 734-750.
    3. Chuanhui Liao & Xiaomei Zhou & Dingtao Zhao, 2018. "An Augmented Risk Information Seeking Model: Perceived Food Safety Risk Related to Food Recalls," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Emma Hartnett & Gregory M. Paoli & Donald W. Schaffner, 2009. "Modeling the Public Health System Response to a Terrorist Event in the Food Supply," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(11), pages 1506-1520, November.
    5. Laura DeLind & Philip Howard, 2008. "Safe at any scale? Food scares, food regulation, and scaled alternatives," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 25(3), pages 301-317, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:rutfwp:310308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fprutus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.