IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/332643.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Forward-Looking Energy Elasticity Parameters for Nested CES Production Function

Author

Listed:
  • Lugovoy, Oleg
  • Potashnikov, Vladimir

Abstract

Elasticities of substitution energy nested CES production function are the key parameters in General Equilibrium modeling for climate and energy policy. However an estimation and validation of the parameters is not straightforward. One of the ways is to use a historical data. Technological shifts between types of fuels and capital and fuels, observed in the past, potentially could be used to calibrate or econometrically estimate the elasticity coefficients. However, historical trends do not describe all the possible investment options available now. Moreover such estimates will be based on investment decisions made in particular economic condition, policies, and available technological/investment options in the time of decision. Application of the parameters for evaluation of future policy options involves undesirable (and unavoidable) assumption that future technological options are equal or similar to those in the past. A variety of new technological options will be disregarded from the analysis. A more natural way to model technological options is so-called Bottom-Up technological models. Such reference energy systems have an extensive representation of energy sector, and take into account currently available and expected technological options, but consider only part of an economy and lack connectivity with other sectors, f.i. do not provide a demand respond. Therefore their application is usually limited to the energy sector. There are several attempts to connect the top-down (CGE/AGE) and bottom-up models known as “soft” or “hard link”. However both methodologies require significant reduction of the models’ scale or some compromise in connectivity between the models. The methodology proposed in this paper might be considered as another way of hybrid modeling where bottom-up model is used to calibrate parameters for a top-down model. It is expected, the energy nest of a General Equilibrium model should provide results similar to the bottom-up model. Bas...

Suggested Citation

  • Lugovoy, Oleg & Potashnikov, Vladimir, 2015. "Forward-Looking Energy Elasticity Parameters for Nested CES Production Function," Conference papers 332643, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332643
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/332643/files/7297.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tsurumi, Hiroki & Tsurumi, Yoshi, 1976. "A Bayesian estimation of macro and micro CES production functions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 1-25, February.
    2. Bohringer, Christoph & Rutherford, Thomas F., 2008. "Combining bottom-up and top-down," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 574-596, March.
    3. Kemfert, Claudia & Welsch, Heinz, 2000. "Energy-Capital-Labor Substitution and the Economic Effects of CO2 Abatement: Evidence for Germany," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 22(6), pages 641-660, November.
    4. Bohringer, Christoph, 1998. "The synthesis of bottom-up and top-down in energy policy modeling," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 233-248, June.
    5. V. K. Chetty & U. Sankar, 1969. "Bayesian Estimation of the CES Production Function," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 36(3), pages 289-294.
    6. Arne Henningsen & Géraldine Henningsen, 2011. "Econometric Estimation of the “Constant Elasticity of Substitution" Function in R: Package micEconCES," IFRO Working Paper 2011/9, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lugovoy, Oleg & Potashnikov, Vladimir, 2013. "Forward-Looking Energy Elasticity Parameters for Nested CES Production Function," Conference papers 332336, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    2. Martin T. Ross, Patrick T. Sullivan, Allen A. Fawcett, and Brooks M. Depro, 2014. "Investigating Technology Options for Climate Policies: Differentiated Roles in ADAGE," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I).
    3. Sebastian Rausch & Valerie J. Karplus, 2014. "Markets versus Regulation: The Efficiency and Distributional Impacts of U.S. Climate Policy Proposals," The Energy Journal, , vol. 35(1_suppl), pages 199-228, June.
    4. Meng, Sam & Siriwardana, Mahinda & McNeill, Judith & Nelson, Tim, 2018. "The impact of an ETS on the Australian energy sector: An integrated CGE and electricity modelling approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 213-224.
    5. Matthew K. Heun & João Santos & Paul E. Brockway & Randall Pruim & Tiago Domingos & Marco Sakai, 2017. "From Theory to Econometrics to Energy Policy: Cautionary Tales for Policymaking Using Aggregate Production Functions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-44, February.
    6. Aramendia, Emmanuel & Brockway, Paul E. & Pizzol, Massimo & Heun, Matthew K., 2021. "Moving from final to useful stage in energy-economy analysis: A critical assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    7. Nicholas Rivers & Steven Groves, 2013. "The Welfare Impact of Self-supplied Water Pricing in Canada: A Computable General Equilibrium Assessment," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 55(3), pages 419-445, July.
    8. Fortes, Patrícia & Pereira, Rui & Pereira, Alfredo & Seixas, Júlia, 2014. "Integrated technological-economic modeling platform for energy and climate policy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 716-730.
    9. Paul E. Brockway & Matthew K. Heun & João Santos & John R. Barrett, 2017. "Energy-Extended CES Aggregate Production: Current Aspects of Their Specification and Econometric Estimation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-23, February.
    10. Christoph Böhringer, Florian Landis, and Miguel Angel Tovar Reaños, 2017. "Economic Impacts of Renewable Energy Production in Germany," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(KAPSARC S).
    11. Lucas Bretschger & Lin Zhang & Roger Ramer, 2012. "Economic effects of a nuclear-phase out policy: A CGE analysis," CER-ETH Economics working paper series 12/167, CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at ETH Zurich.
    12. P. Capros & Denise Van Regemorter & Leonidas Paroussos & P. Karkatsoulis & C. Fragkiadakis & S. Tsani & I. Charalampidis & Tamas Revesz, 2013. "GEM-E3 Model Documentation," JRC Research Reports JRC83177, Joint Research Centre.
    13. Ruamsuke, Kawin & Dhakal, Shobhakar & Marpaung, Charles O.P., 2015. "Energy and economic impacts of the global climate change policy on Southeast Asian countries: A general equilibrium analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 446-461.
    14. Henningsen, Arne & Henningsen, Geraldine & van der Werf, Edwin, 2019. "Capital-labour-energy substitution in a nested CES framework: A replication and update of Kemfert (1998)," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 16-25.
    15. Gallagher, Paul W. & Shapouri, Hosein & Price, Jeffrey, 2006. "Welfare maximization, pricing, and allocation with a product performance or environmental quality standard: Illustration for the gasoline and additives market," ISU General Staff Papers 200606010700001452, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    16. Alberto Gago & Xavier Labandeira & Xiral López Otero, 2014. "A Panorama on Energy Taxes and Green Tax Reforms," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 208(1), pages 145-190, March.
    17. Cai, Yiyong & Newth, David & Finnigan, John & Gunasekera, Don, 2015. "A hybrid energy-economy model for global integrated assessment of climate change, carbon mitigation and energy transformation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 381-395.
    18. Pothen, Frank & Hübler, Michael, 2021. "A forward calibration method for analyzing energy policy in new quantitative trade models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    19. Bjertnæs, Geir H. & Tsygankova, Marina & Martinsen, Thomas, 2013. "Norwegian climate policy reforms in the presence of an international quota market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 147-158.
    20. Tiwari, Aviral, 2010. "On the dynamics of energy consumption and employment in public and private sector," MPRA Paper 24076, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Resource /Energy Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332643. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.