IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/332304.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A sub-national version of the GTAP model for Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Standardi, Gabriele
  • Bosello, Francesco
  • Eboli, Fabio

Abstract

We develop a sub-national version of the GTAP model for Italy. The upgraded model allows assessing more properly the trade and environmental policies and/or shocks, whose effects can be largely different within a country. We use an innovative method to estimate bilateral trade flows across sub-national regions. In addition, the theoretical structure is modified in order to incorporate the possibility of an increasing spatial mobility in both factors and goods market at sub-country level. We carry out a simple experiment to test the robustness of our model. Results are consistent with the standard CGE assumptions; moving towards more competitive and integrated markets a negative shock results in a lower loss in terms of welfare.

Suggested Citation

  • Standardi, Gabriele & Bosello, Francesco & Eboli, Fabio, 2013. "A sub-national version of the GTAP model for Italy," Conference papers 332304, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/332304/files/6586.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Canning, Patrick N. & Tsigas, Marinos E., 2000. "Regionalism, Federalism, and Taxation: A Food and Farm Perspective," Technical Bulletins 33585, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Glyn Wittwer & Mark Horridge, 2010. "Bringing Regional Detail to a CGE Model using Census Data," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 229-255.
    3. McDougall, Robert A., 1999. "Entropy Theory and RAS are Friends," Working papers 283439, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    4. McCallum, John, 1995. "National Borders Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 85(3), pages 615-623, June.
    5. Chintrakarn, Pandej & Millimet, Daniel L., 2006. "The environmental consequences of trade: Evidence from subnational trade flows," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 430-453, July.
    6. McDougall, Robert, 1999. "Entropy Theory and RAS are Friends," GTAP Working Papers 300, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
    7. Perali, Federico & Pieroni, Luca & Standardi, Gabriele, 2012. "World tariff liberalization in agriculture: An assessment using a global CGE trade model for EU15 regions," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 155-180.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Standardi, Gabriele & Cai, Yiyong & Yeh, Sonia, 2017. "Sensitivity of modeling results to technological and regional details: The case of Italy's carbon mitigation policy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 116-128.
    2. Lin, Jianyi & Hu, Yuanchao & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Shi, Longyu & Kang, Jiefeng, 2017. "Developing a city-centric global multiregional input-output model (CCG-MRIO) to evaluate urban carbon footprints," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 460-466.
    3. Andrea Bacilieri & Pablo Austudillo-Estevez, 2023. "Reconstructing firm-level input-output networks from partial information," Papers 2304.00081, arXiv.org.
    4. Ramos Carvajal, Carmen & Fernández Vázquez, Esteban, 2002. "Temporal projection of an input-output tables series for the region of Asturias," ERSA conference papers ersa02p211, European Regional Science Association.
    5. Jakub Boratyński, 2016. "A Bayesian Approach to Matrix Balancing: Transformation of Industry-Level Data under NACE Revision," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 8(4), pages 219-239, December.
    6. Niemi, Janne, 2009. "Dynamic (GTAP) model and baseline for energy and environment issues," Conference papers 331856, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. Casiano Manrique De Lara Peñate & Dolores Santos-Peñate, 2006. "Comparison of Different Updating Procedures and Identification of Temporal Patterns," EcoMod2006 272100059, EcoMod.
    8. Alfredo José Mainar‐Causapé & Pierre Boulanger & Hasan Dudu & Emanuele Ferrari, 2020. "Policy impact assessment in developing countries using Social Accounting Matrices: The Kenya SAM 2014," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(3), pages 1128-1149, August.
    9. Canning, Patrick & Wang, Zhi, 2003. "A Flexible Modeling Framework to Estimate Interregional Trade Patterns and Input-Output Accounts," Conference papers 331136, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    10. Sherman Robinson & Andrea Cattaneo & Moataz El-Said, 2001. "Updating and Estimating a Social Accounting Matrix Using Cross Entropy Methods," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 47-64.
    11. Ana L.M. Sargento & Pedro Nogueira Ramos & Geoffrey J.D. Hewings, 2012. "Inter-Regional Trade Flow Estimation Through Non-Survey Models: An Empirical Assessment," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 173-193, March.
    12. M. Alejandro Cardenete & Ferran Sancho, 2002. "Sensitivity of Simulation Results to Competing SAM Updates," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 556.02, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
    13. Casiano Peñate & Dolores Peñate, 2004. "New Nonlinear Approaches for the Adjustment and Updating of a SAM," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 259-272, September.
    14. Hamasaki, Hiroshi, 2004. "Japanese strategy on climate change to achieve the Kyoto Target with steady economic development -An investigation by using the dynamic version of GTAP-E model," Conference papers 331201, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    15. Umed Temurshoev & Colin Webb & Norihiko Yamano, 2011. "Projection Of Supply And Use Tables: Methods And Their Empirical Assessment," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 91-123.
    16. repec:rre:publsh:v:34:y:2004:i:1:p:37-56 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Alfredo J. Mainar Causape & George Philippidis & Arnaldo Caivano, 2018. "BioSAMs for the EU Member States: Constructing Social Accounting Matrices with a detailed disaggregation of the bio-economy," JRC Research Reports JRC111812, Joint Research Centre.
    18. Jonas Zangenberg Hansen & Peter Stephensen & Joachim Borg Kristensen, 2013. "Household Formation and Housing Demand Forecasts," DREAM Working Paper Series 201308, Danish Rational Economic Agents Model, DREAM.
    19. Alfredo J. Mainar Causape & Emanuele Ferrari & Scott McDonald, 2018. "Social accounting matrices: basic aspects and main steps for estimation," JRC Research Reports JRC112075, Joint Research Centre.
    20. Standardi, Gabriele & Bosello, Francesco & Eboli, Fabio, 2014. "A Sub-national CGE Model for Italy," Climate Change and Sustainable Development 163596, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    21. Campagnolo, Lorenza & De Cian, Enrica, 2022. "Distributional consequences of climate change impacts on residential energy demand across Italian households," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.