IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/330996.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessing the world-wide effects of a shift towards vegetable proteins: a General Equilibrium Model of Agricultural Trade (GEMAT) and the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP)

Author

Listed:
  • van Wesenbeeck, Lia
  • Herok, Claudia

Abstract

The present system of food production has a considerable and rapidly increasing impact on the environment. Meat production, in particular, is not attractive from an environmental point of view, as a result of the inefficient animal conversion of feed into meat. However, meat is clearly attractive to consumers all over the world. Since the non-meat protein products presently on the market do not meet the expectations of most western-style consumers, they do not constitute realistic alternatives to meat. The prospects for replacing meat-derived ingredients by non-meat ingredients are more promising. The PROFETAS project (Protein Foods, Environment, Technology and Society) is a Dutch multidisciplinary research program on sustainable food systems, which includes researchers from the fields of plant breeding, food technology, economics, and environmental sciences. The central research question of the project is to what extent a shift from animal to plant protein foods can be environmentally more sustainable than present trends; technologically feasible; and socially desirable. Whereas the technical research concentrates on defining plant-based protein products that closely resemble meat ingredients in terms of taste, texture, and so on, the economic assessment concentrates on the consequences of such a transition for agricultural production and trade, and on its economic feasibility. A second objective is to contribute to the methodological development of AGE models in agriculture. Therefore, two models are being used. One is the GTAP model that, in PROFETAS, is used at the Agricultural Economics Research Institute (LEI) and is employed to trace changes in production, consumption, trade and welfare for EU countries, other regions of interest as well as the rest of the world. Although there are clear and well-known advantages of using GTAP, the “one size fits all” approach of having a single model framework for widely differing issues and regions clearly also has disadvantages. The underlying paper describes how the GTAP framework, and the second model (GEMAT), developed at the Centre for World Food Studies (SOW-VU) can contribute to understanding the likely effects of a transition. GEMAT changes some assumptions made within the GTAP model regarding agricultural production, trade, and consumption. In particular, the model includes different land types, with the possibility of conversion by investments; imposes physical constraints on the maximum attainable yield per ha for different crop types in different regions; explicitly incorporates constraints on feed composition for ruminants and monogastrics that follow from dietary requirements for these types of animals; models the production of many feed items as byproducts of the production of food; includes multifunctional agriculture as a means of promoting a production shift towards more environmentally-friendly production; and includes a projected meat demand pattern that shifts with changes in the distribution of income. In addition, there is no Armington assumption imposed to describe trade between countries. On the other hand, institutional elements of world agricultural trade, such as the EU Common Agricultural Policy, are not (yet) included in the model, and its empirical base is much weaker than that of the GTAP framework. Therefore, in this paper, GEMAT is used to show the effects of alternative model structures in the study of a transition from meat to NPFs, whereas GTAP simulations concentrate on changes in policy. The contributions of this paper are methodological as well as empirical. The results of the model exercises carried out with GEMAT reveal the importance of including the above-mentioned assumptions on agricultural production and consumption. GTAP provides the effects of general macroeconomic trends and political developments. In addition, the paper shows the importance of using different models to study different aspects of a complex problem, and as such, shows the limits of the "one size fits all" approach.

Suggested Citation

  • van Wesenbeeck, Lia & Herok, Claudia, 2002. "Assessing the world-wide effects of a shift towards vegetable proteins: a General Equilibrium Model of Agricultural Trade (GEMAT) and the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP)," Conference papers 330996, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:330996
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/330996/files/313.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gehlhar, Mark, 1996. "Reconciling Bilateral Trade Data for Use in GTAP," GTAP Technical Papers 313, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
    2. Gehlhar, Mark J., 1996. "Reconciling Bilateral Trade Data For Use In Gtap," Technical Papers 28714, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    3. Hertel, Thomas, 1997. "Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and applications," GTAP Books, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, number 7685, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Zhi & Gehlhar, Mark & Yao, Shunli, 2010. "A globally consistent framework for reliability-based trade statistics reconciliation in the presence of an entrepôt," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 161-189, March.
    2. Uris L. C. Baldos & Thomas W. Hertel & Frances C. Moore, 2019. "Understanding the Spatial Distribution of Welfare Impacts of Global Warming on Agriculture and its Drivers," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 101(5), pages 1455-1472, October.
    3. Uris Baldos & Thomas Hertel & Frances Moore, 2018. "The Biophysical and Economic Geographies of Global Climate Impacts on Agriculture," NBER Working Papers 24779, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Peter B. Dixon & Maureen Rimmer & Nhi Tran, 2019. "GTAP-MVH, A Model for Analysing the Worldwide Effects of Trade Policies in the Motor Vehicle Sector: Theory and Data," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-290, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
    5. Angel Aguiar & Badri Narayanan & Robert McDougall, 2016. "An Overview of the GTAP 9 Data Base," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 1(1), pages 181-208, June.
    6. Frank van Tongeren & Robert Koopman & Stephen Karingi & John Reilly & Joseph Francois, 2021. "Back to the Future: A 25-Year Retrospective on GTAP and the Shaping of a New Agenda," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Peter Dixon & Joseph Francois & Dominique van der Mensbrugghe (ed.), POLICY ANALYSIS AND MODELING OF THE GLOBAL ECONOMY A Festschrift Celebrating Thomas Hertel, chapter 3, pages 41-93, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    7. Osman, Rehab Osman Mohamed, 2012. "The EU Economic Partnership Agreements with Southern Africa: a computable general equilibrium analysis," Economics PhD Theses 0412, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    8. Peter B. Dixon & Maureen Rimmer & Nhi Tran, 2020. "Creating a Disaggregated CGE Model for Trade Policy Analysis: GTAP-MVH," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 55(1), pages 42-79, February.
    9. Kastner, Thomas & Kastner, Michael & Nonhebel, Sanderine, 2011. "Tracing distant environmental impacts of agricultural products from a consumer perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(6), pages 1032-1040, April.
    10. Lars Karlsson & Peter Hedberg, 2021. "War and trade in the peaceful century: the impact of interstate wars on bilateral trade flows during the first wave of globalization, 1830–1913," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 74(3), pages 809-830, August.
    11. Ferrantino, Michael J. & Liu, Xuepeng & Wang, Zhi, 2012. "Evasion behaviors of exporters and importers: Evidence from the U.S.–China trade data discrepancy," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 141-157.
    12. Drogue, Sophie & Bartova, Lubica, 2007. "A Critical Survey of Databases on Tariffs and Trade Available for the Analysis of EU Agricultural Agreements," Working Papers 7287, TRADEAG - Agricultural Trade Agreements.
    13. Shaar, Karam, 2017. "Reconciling International Trade Data," MPRA Paper 81572, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Tiziano Distefano & Guido Chiarotti & Francesco Laio & Luca Ridolfi, 2018. "Spatial distribution of the international food prices: unexpected randomness and heterogeneity," SEEDS Working Papers 0118, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised Jan 2018.
    15. Sarica, Kemal & Tyner, Wallace E., 2013. "Analysis of US renewable fuels policies using a modified MARKAL model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 701-709.
    16. Joseph Francois & Miriam Manchin & Patrick Tomberger, 2015. "Services Linkages and the Value Added Content of Trade," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(11), pages 1631-1649, November.
    17. Alexandre Milovanoff & I. Daniel Posen & Heather L. MacLean, 2021. "Quantifying environmental impacts of primary aluminum ingot production and consumption : A trade‐linked multilevel life cycle assessment," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(1), pages 67-78, February.
    18. Pant, Hom P. & Yainshet, Alasebu, 2010. "Would Carbon Pricing Reduce Deforestation? Insights from illustrative simulations of GTEM augmented with a land use change and forestry module," Conference papers 331956, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    19. Tsigas, Marinos & Wang, Zhi & Gehlhar, Mark, 2012. "How a Global Inter-Country Input-output Table with a Processing Trade Account Can Be Constructed from GTAP Database," Conference papers 332205, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    20. Elisabeth M. Christen & Joseph Francois & Bernard Hoekman, 2012. "CGE Modeling of Market Access in Services," Economics working papers 2012-08, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:330996. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.