IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/331956.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Would Carbon Pricing Reduce Deforestation? Insights from illustrative simulations of GTEM augmented with a land use change and forestry module

Author

Listed:
  • Pant, Hom P.
  • Yainshet, Alasebu

Abstract

This paper describes a numerical implementation of the global trade and environment model (GTEM) augmented with a new land use change and forestry module developed in Pant (2010), under some extreme assumptions. Also described are the simplifications made to the structure of the module and additional simplifying assumptions made in deriving a stylised database to calibrate the module in a way that is consistent with the overall structure of GTEM and its underlying database. The results reported in this paper are based on a stylised database and parameter values, and extreme modelling assumptions. These are for illustrative purposes only and should not be used for policy design. Preliminary simulation results indicate that a higher carbon price: (i) discourages land clearing, both legal and illegal, (ii) reduces net emissions from land use change, (iii) reallocates land mainly from livestock production to forestry activity, and (iv) encourages investment in commercial forestry more than in environmental forestry as logs from native forests become more expensive. The magnitude of these results could alter substantially under more plausible assumptions regarding the carbon policy scenarios, population and technologies involving a switch from wood to non-wood products. The purpose of this technical paper is to seek expert advice and feedback on the analytical framework from the conference participants as well as identifying the need for critical data and, thereby, encouraging the development of a more realistic forestry related database and a consistent disaggregation of the GTAP database.

Suggested Citation

  • Pant, Hom P. & Yainshet, Alasebu, 2010. "Would Carbon Pricing Reduce Deforestation? Insights from illustrative simulations of GTEM augmented with a land use change and forestry module," Conference papers 331956, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/331956/files/4931.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gehlhar, Mark, 1996. "Reconciling Bilateral Trade Data for Use in GTAP," GTAP Technical Papers 313, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
    2. Gehlhar, Mark J., 1996. "Reconciling Bilateral Trade Data For Use In Gtap," Technical Papers 28714, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kastner, Thomas & Kastner, Michael & Nonhebel, Sanderine, 2011. "Tracing distant environmental impacts of agricultural products from a consumer perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(6), pages 1032-1040, April.
    2. Wang, Zhi & Gehlhar, Mark & Yao, Shunli, 2010. "A globally consistent framework for reliability-based trade statistics reconciliation in the presence of an entrepôt," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 161-189, March.
    3. Lars Karlsson & Peter Hedberg, 2021. "War and trade in the peaceful century: the impact of interstate wars on bilateral trade flows during the first wave of globalization, 1830–1913," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 74(3), pages 809-830, August.
    4. Ferrantino, Michael J. & Liu, Xuepeng & Wang, Zhi, 2012. "Evasion behaviors of exporters and importers: Evidence from the U.S.–China trade data discrepancy," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 141-157.
    5. Drogue, Sophie & Bartova, Lubica, 2007. "A Critical Survey of Databases on Tariffs and Trade Available for the Analysis of EU Agricultural Agreements," Working Papers 7287, TRADEAG - Agricultural Trade Agreements.
    6. Shaar, Karam, 2017. "Reconciling International Trade Data," MPRA Paper 81572, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Tiziano Distefano & Guido Chiarotti & Francesco Laio & Luca Ridolfi, 2018. "Spatial distribution of the international food prices: unexpected randomness and heterogeneity," SEEDS Working Papers 0118, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised Jan 2018.
    8. Sarica, Kemal & Tyner, Wallace E., 2013. "Analysis of US renewable fuels policies using a modified MARKAL model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 701-709.
    9. Joseph Francois & Miriam Manchin & Patrick Tomberger, 2015. "Services Linkages and the Value Added Content of Trade," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(11), pages 1631-1649, November.
    10. Uris L. C. Baldos & Thomas W. Hertel & Frances C. Moore, 2019. "Understanding the Spatial Distribution of Welfare Impacts of Global Warming on Agriculture and its Drivers," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 101(5), pages 1455-1472, October.
    11. Alexandre Milovanoff & I. Daniel Posen & Heather L. MacLean, 2021. "Quantifying environmental impacts of primary aluminum ingot production and consumption : A trade‐linked multilevel life cycle assessment," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(1), pages 67-78, February.
    12. Tsigas, Marinos & Wang, Zhi & Gehlhar, Mark, 2012. "How a Global Inter-Country Input-output Table with a Processing Trade Account Can Be Constructed from GTAP Database," Conference papers 332205, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    13. Elisabeth M. Christen & Joseph Francois & Bernard Hoekman, 2012. "CGE Modeling of Market Access in Services," Economics working papers 2012-08, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
    14. Uris Baldos & Thomas Hertel & Frances Moore, 2018. "The Biophysical and Economic Geographies of Global Climate Impacts on Agriculture," NBER Working Papers 24779, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Peter B. Dixon & Maureen Rimmer & Nhi Tran, 2019. "GTAP-MVH, A Model for Analysing the Worldwide Effects of Trade Policies in the Motor Vehicle Sector: Theory and Data," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-290, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
    16. Daniel Dujava & Maria Siranova, 2017. "Getting the Measures of Trade Misinvoicing Right: Bilateral Panel Data Approach," Working Papers wp98, Institute of Economic Research, Slovak Academy of Sciences, revised 20 Dec 2017.
    17. Mohammad Farhad & Michael Jetter & Abu Siddique & Andrew Williams, 2018. "Misreported Trade," CESifo Working Paper Series 7150, CESifo.
    18. repec:vuw:vuwecf:16724 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Angel Aguiar & Badri Narayanan & Robert McDougall, 2016. "An Overview of the GTAP 9 Data Base," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 1(1), pages 181-208, June.
    20. Han, Yijun & Hertel, Thomas W., 2003. "The Puzzling State of China's Meat Trade," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 18(2), pages 1-6.
    21. Christen, Elisabeth & Francois, Joseph & Hoekman, Bernard, 2013. "Computable General Equilibrium Modeling of Market Access in Services," Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, in: Peter B. Dixon & Dale Jorgenson (ed.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 1601-1643, Elsevier.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.