IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/330932.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Resolving Taiwan's Nuclear Power Puzzle: The Economic Impacts of Terminating the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Ping-Cheng
  • Hsu, Shih-Hsun

Abstract

The continuing struggle between the ruling DPP and the opposition alliance over the fate of the controversial Fourth Nuclear Power Plant has been a major policy issue in Taiwan since the new anti-nuclear power government took office on May 20, 2000. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the economic impacts of the termination of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant under different alternative policy proposals. The proposals considered in this research are 1) the termination of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant without any alternative undertaken, 2) overall energy efficiency improvement as an alternative policy, 3) thermal efficiency improvement in coal-fired power plant as an alternative power source, and 4) thermal efficiency improvement in natural gas-fired power generation facilities as an alternative power source. The analysis in this paper is based on simulation results from TAIGEM-D (TAIwan General Equilibrium Model-Dynamic), a dynamic, multisectoral, applied general equilibrium model of the Taiwan’s economy, developed specifically to analyze energy and climate change response issues. The findings of this research clearly demonstrated that the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant is not as necessary as is alleged by Taiwan Power Company. Under the worst scenario when no alternative tactics are available, the termination of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant will only cause medium to small impacts on the Taiwan economy. If the actions of energy efficiency improvement and retrofitting of the existing power plants are undertaken, the Taiwan economy will be better off even though the termination of the project may lead to a shortage of electricity. Moreover, policy simulation results also indicate that the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant shows no supremacy over the power plant retrofitting options when CO2 emissions are a concern.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Ping-Cheng & Hsu, Shih-Hsun, 2001. "Resolving Taiwan's Nuclear Power Puzzle: The Economic Impacts of Terminating the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant," Conference papers 330932, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:330932
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/330932/files/3063.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:ucp:bkecon:9780226301532 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Branko Milanovic, 2002. "True World Income Distribution, 1988 and 1993: First Calculation Based on Household Surveys Alone," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 112(476), pages 51-92, January.
    3. repec:bla:ausecr:v:38:y:2005:i:2:p:159-175 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Drolet, Marie & Zhang, Xuelin & Morissette, Rene, 2002. "The Evolution of Wealth Inequality in Canada, 1984-1999," Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series 2002187e, Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch.
    5. King, Mervyn A. & Leape, Jonathan I., 1998. "Wealth and portfolio composition: Theory and evidence," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 155-193, June.
    6. Janine Aron & John Muellbauer & Johan Prinsloo, 2006. "Estimating the Balance Sheet of the Personal Sector in an Emerging Market Country: South Africa 1975-2003," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2006-99, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. World Bank, 2005. "Where is the Wealth of Nations? Measuring Capital for the 21st Century," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 7505.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James B. Davies & Susanna Sandström & Anthony Shorrocks & Edward N. Wolff, 2011. "The Level and Distribution of Global Household Wealth," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 121(551), pages 223-254, March.
    2. Francisco Gomes & Alexander Michaelides, 2003. "Portfolio Choice With Internal Habit Formation: A Life-Cycle Model With Uninsurable Labor Income Risk," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 6(4), pages 729-766, October.
    3. Eric Gaisie, 2017. "Living standards in pre-independent Ghana: evidence from household budgets," HHB Working Papers Series 7, The Historical Household Budgets Project.
    4. Francisco Gomes & Alexander Michaelides, 2005. "Optimal Life‐Cycle Asset Allocation: Understanding the Empirical Evidence," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 60(2), pages 869-904, April.
    5. Danny Ben-Shahar & Jacob Warszawski, 2016. "Inequality in housing affordability: Measurement and estimation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(6), pages 1178-1202, May.
    6. Kaika, Dimitra & Zervas, Efthimios, 2013. "The environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) theory. Part B: Critical issues," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1403-1411.
    7. Ken‐ichi Hashimoto & Ryonghun Im & Takuma Kunieda & Akihisa Shibata, 2022. "Asset bubbles, unemployment, and financial market frictions," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 60(4), pages 1806-1832, October.
    8. Raslan Alzuabi & Sarah Brown & Mark N. Harris & Karl Taylor, 2024. "Modelling the composition of household portfolios: A latent class approach," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(1), pages 243-275, February.
    9. Bussolo Maurizio & de Hoyos Rafael E. & Medvedev Denis & van der Mensbrugghe Dominique, 2012. "Global Growth and Distribution: China, India, and the Emergence of a Global Middle Class," Journal of Globalization and Development, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 1-29, January.
    10. Olivier Cadot & Jaime de Melo & Patrick Plane & Laurent Wagner & Martha Tesfaye Woldemichael, 2016. "Industrialisation et transformation structurelle : l’Afrique subsaharienne peut-elle se développer sans usines ?," Revue d’économie du développement, De Boeck Université, vol. 24(2), pages 19-49.
    11. repec:dau:papers:123456789/9805 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. John COCKBURN & Jean-Yves DUCLOS & Agnès ZABSONRÉ, 2011. "Is the value of humanity increasing? A critical-level enquiry," Working Papers I13, FERDI.
    13. Anthony B. Atkinson & Andrea Brandolini, 2010. "On Analyzing the World Distribution of Income," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 24(1), pages 1-37, January.
    14. Laurent E. Calvet & Paolo Sodini, 2014. "Twin Picks: Disentangling the Determinants of Risk-Taking in Household Portfolios," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(2), pages 867-906, April.
    15. Kym Anderson & John Cockburn & Will Martin, 2011. "Would Freeing Up World Trade Reduce Poverty and Inequality? The Vexed Role of Agricultural Distortions," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 487-515, April.
    16. Litwiński Michł, 2019. "The Influence of Income Inequalities on Socio-Economic Development in the European Union," Econometrics. Advances in Applied Data Analysis, Sciendo, vol. 23(1), pages 45-60, March.
    17. Sanjay Reddy & Rahul Lahoti & Arjun Jayadev, 2015. "The global consumption and income project: An introduction and preliminary findings," WIDER Working Paper Series 003, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    18. Kevin H. O'Rourke, 2002. "Globalization and Inequality: Historical Trends," Aussenwirtschaft, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science, Swiss Institute for International Economics and Applied Economics Research, vol. 57(01), pages 65-104, March.
    19. Muhammad Shahbaz & Mita Bhattacharya & Mantu Kumar Mahalik, 2017. "Finance and income inequality in Kazakhstan: evidence since transition with policy suggestions," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(52), pages 5337-5351, November.
    20. Alberto Díaz Dapena & Esteban Fernández Vázquez & Fernando Rubiera Morollón & Ana Viñuela, 2021. "Mapping poverty at the local level in Europe: A consistent spatial disaggregation of the AROPE indicator for France, Spain, Portugal and the United Kingdom," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(1), pages 63-81, February.
    21. Onil Banerjee & Martin Cicowiez & Renato Vargas & Mark Horridge, 2019. "The SEEA-Based Integrated Economic-Environmental Modelling Framework: An Illustration with Guatemala’s Forest and Fuelwood Sector," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 72(2), pages 539-558, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:330932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.