IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ndtr06/208037.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Investment in Rural Roads: Willingness-to-Pay for Improved Gravel Road Services in Freight Transportation

Author

Listed:
  • VanWechel, Tamara
  • Vachal, Kimberly

Abstract

Transport of commodities in rural areas is an important issue and an area where research is needed. As trends for rural road funding decrease, the need for improvements and maintenance of rural roads used for rural freight transportation increase. Although rural roads are in need of improvements, uncertainties exist about what type of improvements road users think are most important and whether or not they would pay more for bettering services to these roads. The objective of this report is to develop a profile of rural road users’ opinions of rural road services. More specifically, what are rural agricultural producers willing to pay for local road service improvements and what financing methods would they be most agreeable to? Local government decision makers have limited budgets for roads, and thus are faced with difficult allocation decisions. Data about what producers think is important in rural road services can help determine options for these roads and assist in forming conclusions beneficial to rural road users. This data will be helpful in local government budget decision making and appropriation decisions, state DOT planning, and economic development strategies. Survey data for this research was collected in a case study analysis. The survey included questions about producers’ perceptions of roads used to haul commodities to market. Although the participants of this survey were restricted to producers from the state of North Dakota, results are applicable to other rural states. To define a specific farm to market route, surveys were mailed to producers who haul or have hauled product to two facilities in Enderlin, North Dakota: the Plains, Grain, and Agronomy grain elevator shuttle facility and the ADM Northern Sun oilseed processing plant. The survey questions were divided into three sections including farm operation description, rural road usage, and rural road services perceptions. The two rural road service issues that appear predominant from response analysis are rural road surface quality and vehicle weight limits. These services show up frequently in survey responses. Producers are concerned about, want improvements to, and are willing to pay for these services. Load limits stand out as especially important to producers. When asked about willingness to pay for improving various road services, the greatest number of participants indicates they would pay for improvements that would increase load limits (36 percent). Gravel road surfaces are an area producers would like to see money used for in rural road improvements. Other areas where producers indicate they would like to see money spent for improvements include paved road surfaces and signs & safety. Survey respondents also say they are most willing to use cost participation, fines, or sales tax to finance rural road improvements when questioned about innovative financing methods.

Suggested Citation

  • VanWechel, Tamara & Vachal, Kimberly, 2006. "Investment in Rural Roads: Willingness-to-Pay for Improved Gravel Road Services in Freight Transportation," 47th Annual Transportation Research Forum, New York, New York, March 23-25, 2006 208037, Transportation Research Forum.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr06:208037
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.208037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/208037/files/2006_7B_RuralRoads_paper.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.208037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brownstone, David & Ghosh, Arindam & Golob, Thomas F. & Kazimi, Camilla & Van Amelsfort, Dirk, 2003. "Drivers' willingness-to-pay to reduce travel time: evidence from the San Diego I-15 congestion pricing project," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 373-387, May.
    2. Hough, Jill & Hegland, Gary & Bahe, Crystal, 2003. "An Assessment of Regional Road User Needs in Three Rural States," MPC Reports 231690, North Dakota State University, Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. VanWechel, Tamara & Vachal, Kimberly, 2004. "Investment in Rural Roads: Willingness-to-Pay for Improved Gravel Road Service in Freight Transportation," MPC Reports 231701, North Dakota State University, Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute.
    2. Steimetz, Seiji S.C. & Brownstone, David, 2005. "Estimating commuters' "value of time" with noisy data: a multiple imputation approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 865-889, December.
    3. Seiji S. C. Steimetz, 2009. "White‐Knuckle Externalities," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 47(2), pages 304-316, April.
    4. Janson, Michael & Levinson, David, 2014. "HOT or not," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 21-32.
    5. He, Brian Yueshuai & Zhou, Jinkai & Ma, Ziyi & Wang, Ding & Sha, Di & Lee, Mina & Chow, Joseph Y.J. & Ozbay, Kaan, 2021. "A validated multi-agent simulation test bed to evaluate congestion pricing policies on population segments by time-of-day in New York City," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 145-161.
    6. Papakonstantinou, Ilia & Lee, Jinwoo & Madanat, Samer Michel, 2019. "Game theoretic approaches for highway infrastructure protection against sea level rise: Co-opetition among multiple players," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 21-37.
    7. MELIS, Lissa & SÖRENSEN, Kenneth, 2021. "The real-time on-demand bus routing problem: What is the cost of dynamic requests?," Working Papers 2021003, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    8. Markose, Sheri & Alentorn, Amadeo & Koesrindartoto, Deddy & Allen, Peter & Blythe, Phil & Grosso, Sergio, 2007. "A smart market for passenger road transport (SMPRT) congestion: An application of computational mechanism design," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 2001-2032, June.
    9. Barahimi, Amir Hossein & Eydi, Alireza & Aghaie, Abdolah, 2021. "Multi-modal urban transit network design considering reliability: multi-objective bi-level optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    10. Thomas M. Fullerton Jr. & Angel L. Molina Jr & Adam G. Walke, 2013. "Tolls, exchange rates, and northbound international bridge traffic from Mexico," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(3), pages 305-321, August.
    11. Holgui­n-Veras, Jose & Cetin, Mecit & Xia, Shuwen, 2006. "A comparative analysis of US toll policy," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(10), pages 852-871, December.
    12. Ji, Xiangfeng & Chu, Yanyu, 2020. "A target-oriented bi-attribute user equilibrium model with travelers’ perception errors on the tolled traffic network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    13. Jang, Kitae & Cassidy, Michael J., 2012. "Dual influences on vehicle speed in special-use lanes and critique of US regulation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(7), pages 1108-1123.
    14. Pascal Courty & Mario Pagliero, 2011. "Does responsive pricing smooth demand shocks?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(30), pages 4707-4721.
    15. Kockelman, Kara M. & Kalmanje, Sukumar, 2005. "Credit-based congestion pricing: a policy proposal and the public's response," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 39(7-9), pages 671-690.
    16. Jang, Kitae & Cassidy, Michael J., 2011. "Dual Influences on Vehicle Speeds in Special-Use Lanes and Policy Implications," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt0dd859tf, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    17. Jacob, Jagan, 2020. "Should competing firms cooperate to reduce congestion?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    18. Haghani, Milad & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Rose, John M. & Oppewal, Harmen & Lancsar, Emily, 2021. "Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part I. Macro-scale analysis of literature and integrative synthesis of empirical evidence from applied economics, experimental psychology and neuroimag," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    19. Fafoutellis, Panagiotis & Mantouka, Eleni G. & Vlahogianni, Eleni I., 2022. "Acceptance of a Pay-How-You-Drive pricing scheme for city traffic: The case of Athens," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 270-284.
    20. Marcycruz de Leon & Thomas M Fullerton Jr & Brian W Kelly, 2009. "Tolls, Exchange Rates, And Borderplex International Bridge Traffic," Articles, International Journal of Transport Economics, vol. 36(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr06:208037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.trforum.org/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.