IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ifma11/345585.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

PR - Assessing Market Orientation And Firm Performance Across Value Disciplines In The Illinois Beef Sector (p453-466)

Author

Listed:
  • Micheels, Eric T.
  • Gow, Hamish R.

Abstract

Previous research studies have suggested market oriented firms achieve superior performance relative to their peers (Narver and Slater, 1990). Observed performance differences may be attributable to the firm’s ability to clearly define how they provide value to the market (Narver, Slater and Tietje, 1998). Recently, Micheels and Gow (2009) found that highly market oriented and innovative firms are able to more clearly define their value discipline. However, the impact of value discipline clarity on firm performance has not yet been examined. Using a sample of 343 Illinois beef producers, we find that market orientation levels are lowest for operationally excellent producers and highest for customer intimacy producers. Further, we find firm performance to be lowest for firms with an operational excellence value discipline.

Suggested Citation

  • Micheels, Eric T. & Gow, Hamish R., 2011. "PR - Assessing Market Orientation And Firm Performance Across Value Disciplines In The Illinois Beef Sector (p453-466)," 18th Congress, Methven, New Zealand, 2011 345585, International Farm Management Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifma11:345585
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345585
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/345585/files/11_MicheelsGow_P453-466.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.345585?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Homburg, Christian & Krohmer, Harley & Workman, John Jr., 2004. "A strategy implementation perspective of market orientation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(12), pages 1331-1340, December.
    2. John A. Pearce & D. Keith Robbins & Richard B. Robinson, 1987. "The impact of grand strategy and planning formality on financial performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(2), pages 125-134, March.
    3. Menguc, Bulent & Auh, Seigyoung & Shih, Eric, 2007. "Transformational leadership and market orientation: Implications for the implementation of competitive strategies and business unit performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(4), pages 314-321, April.
    4. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Day, Marc & Lichtenstein, Scott & Samouel, Phillip, 2015. "Supply management capabilities, routine bundles and their impact on firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-13.
    2. Wang, Guangping & Miao, C. Fred, 2015. "Effects of sales force market orientation on creativity, innovation implementation, and sales performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 2374-2382.
    3. Bhuian, Shahid N. & Menguc, Bulent & Bell, Simon J., 2005. "Just entrepreneurial enough: the moderating effect of entrepreneurship on the relationship between market orientation and performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 9-17, January.
    4. Stern Neill, 2010. "Decomposing the effects of organizational memory on marketing implementation," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 135-147, June.
    5. Waleczek, Peter & von den Driesch, Till & Flatten, Tessa C. & Brettel, Malte, 2019. "On the dynamic bundles behind operations management and research and development," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 175-187.
    6. Andreas Kallmuenzer & Ursula Scholl-Grissemann, 2017. "Disentangling antecedents and performance effects of family SME innovation: A knowledge-based perspective," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 1117-1138, December.
    7. Grote, Markus & Herstatt, Cornelius & Gemünden, Hans-Georg, 2012. "Cross-divisional innovation in large, multi-divisional firms: Economic relevance and managerial actions," Working Papers 66, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    8. Line, Nathaniel D. & Runyan, Rodney C., 2014. "Destination marketing and the service-dominant logic: A resource-based operationalization of strategic marketing assets," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 91-102.
    9. Maria Ripollés & Andreu Blesa, 0. "Entry mode choices in the international new ventures context. A study from different theoretical perspectives," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-21.
    10. Aboobucker Ilmudeen, 2022. "Leveraging IT-enabled dynamic capabilities to shape business process agility and firm innovative capability: moderating role of turbulent environment," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(8), pages 2341-2379, November.
    11. Yu, Wantao & Jacobs, Mark A. & Chavez, Roberto & Yang, Jiehui, 2019. "Dynamism, disruption orientation, and resilience in the supply chain and the impacts on financial performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 352-362.
    12. Heckmann, Nadine & Steger, Thomas & Dowling, Michael, 2016. "Organizational capacity for change, change experience, and change project performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 777-784.
    13. Dubey, Rameshwar & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Childe, Stephen J. & Papadopoulos, Thanos & Luo, Zongwei & Wamba, Samuel Fosso & Roubaud, David, 2019. "Can big data and predictive analytics improve social and environmental sustainability?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 534-545.
    14. Dominik M. Wielgos & Christian Homburg & Christina Kuehnl, 2021. "Digital business capability: its impact on firm and customer performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 762-789, July.
    15. Holm, Morten & Kumar, V. & Plenborg, Thomas, 2016. "An investigation of Customer Accounting systems as a source of sustainable competitive advantage," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 18-30.
    16. Dangol, Ramesh & Bahl, Mona & Karpak, Birsen, 2015. "Timing cooperative relationships with sequential capability development process to reduce capability development trade-offs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 179-189.
    17. Behl, Abhishek & Jayawardena, Nirma & Nigam, Achint & Pereira, Vijay & Shankar, Amit & Jebarajakirthy, Charles, 2023. "Investigating the revised international marketing strategies during COVID-19 based on resources and capabilities of the firms: A mixed method approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    18. Jabril Ramadan & Ahmad Alzubi & Amir Khadem, 2024. "The Impact of Strategic Entrepreneurship Behaviors on Business Performance in Turkish SMES: The Role of Business Model Innovation and Competitive Intensity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-21, September.
    19. Maree Storer & Paul Hyland, 2011. "Utilizing Industry-led Innovation Capacity to Enhance Supply Chain Performance : An Empirical Study," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(6), pages 1-55, December.
    20. Spralls, Samuel A. & Hunt, Shelby D. & Wilcox, James B., 2011. "Extranet Use and Building Relationship Capital in Interfirm Distribution Networks: The Role of Extranet Capability," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 59-74.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Industrial Organization;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifma11:345585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.