IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ifma09/345522.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

PR - Market Orientation, Organizational Learning, And Positional Advantage: Are These Concepts Relevant In Production Agriculture Systems?

Author

Listed:
  • Micheels, Eric T.
  • Gow, Hamish R.

Abstract

Marketing and strategy scholars have long established the importance of a market orientation in determining firm performance. More recently, scholars have studied the effect of a market orientation in agriculture. This study extends this work by examining the concept of a positional advantage and its effect on performance in an agricultural setting. Using a sample of 347 Illinois beef producers, we empirically measure the construct of positional advantage and test the relationship between positional advantage and subjective performance. Our results indicate that market orientation, entrepreneurship, innovation and organizational learning are first-order indicators of positional advantage and that the positional advantage of a firm is positively related to firm performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Micheels, Eric T. & Gow, Hamish R., 2009. "PR - Market Orientation, Organizational Learning, And Positional Advantage: Are These Concepts Relevant In Production Agriculture Systems?," 17th Congress, Illinois State University, USA, July 19-24, 2009 345522, International Farm Management Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifma09:345522
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/345522/files/09_MicheelsGow.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.345522?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Homburg, Christian & Krohmer, Harley & Workman, John Jr., 2004. "A strategy implementation perspective of market orientation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(12), pages 1331-1340, December.
    2. Ross, R. Brent & Westgren, Randall E., 2006. "Economic Returns to Entrepreneurial Behavior," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 38(2), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. G. Tomas M. Hult & David J. Ketchen, 2001. "Does market orientation matter?: a test of the relationship between positional advantage and performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(9), pages 899-906, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aziz Barhmi & Omar Hajaji, 2023. "Multidisciplinary Approach to Supply Chain Resilience: Conceptualization and Scale Development," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(5), pages 43-69.
    2. Dominik M. Wielgos & Christian Homburg & Christina Kuehnl, 2021. "Digital business capability: its impact on firm and customer performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 762-789, July.
    3. Maree Storer & Paul Hyland, 2011. "Utilizing Industry-led Innovation Capacity to Enhance Supply Chain Performance : An Empirical Study," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(6), pages 1-55, December.
    4. Abbu, Haroon R. & Gopalakrishna, Pradeep, 2021. "Synergistic effects of market orientation implementation and internalization on firm performance: Direct marketing service provider industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 851-863.
    5. Ahmet H., Kirca, 2011. "The effects of market orientation on subsidiary performance: Empirical evidence from MNCs in Turkey," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 447-454, October.
    6. Jantunen, Ari & Nummela, Niina & Puumalainen, Kaisu & Saarenketo, Sami, 2008. "Strategic orientations of born globals--Do they really matter?," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 158-170, March.
    7. Deutscher, Franziska & Zapkau, Florian B. & Schwens, Christian & Baum, Matthias & Kabst, Ruediger, 2016. "Strategic orientations and performance: A configurational perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 849-861.
    8. Andrea Buratti & Giancarlo Ferrero, 2017. "Empirical evidence of Entrepreneurial Marketing Orientation from Italian firms," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(4), pages 151-173.
    9. Katharina Fellnhofer, 2019. "The Complementary Effects Of Firms’ And Team Leaders’ Entrepreneurial Orientation On Innovation Success And Performance," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(05), pages 1-32, June.
    10. Bhuian, Shahid N. & Menguc, Bulent & Bell, Simon J., 2005. "Just entrepreneurial enough: the moderating effect of entrepreneurship on the relationship between market orientation and performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 9-17, January.
    11. Micheels, Eric T. & Gow, Hamish R., 2011. "PR - Assessing Market Orientation And Firm Performance Across Value Disciplines In The Illinois Beef Sector (p453-466)," 18th Congress, Methven, New Zealand, 2011 345585, International Farm Management Association.
    12. Micheels, Eric T. & Gow, Hamish R., 2008. "Market Orientation and Profitability: Evidence from Homogeneous Markets," 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida 6484, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    13. Nadia Zahoor & Yong Kyu Lew, 2022. "Sustaining superior international performance: Strategic orientations and dynamic capability of environmentally concerned small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1002-1017, March.
    14. Jenny María Ruiz-Jiménez & Matilde Ruiz-Arroyo & María Mar Fuentes-Fuentes, 2021. "The impact of effectuation, causation, and resources on new venture performance: novice versus expert entrepreneurs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1761-1781, December.
    15. Rodrigo Martín-Rojas & Virginia Fernández-Pérez & Encarnación García-Sánchez, 2017. "Encouraging organizational performance through the influence of technological distinctive competencies on components of corporate entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 397-426, June.
    16. Wenbo Jiang & Francesco Rosati & Huaqi Chai & Taiwen Feng, 2020. "Market orientation practices enhancing corporate environmental performance via knowledge creation: Does environmental management system implementation matter?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1899-1924, July.
    17. Alteren, Gro & Tudoran, Ana Alina, 2016. "Enhancing export performance: Betting on customer orientation, behavioral commitment, and communication," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 370-381.
    18. Stern Neill, 2010. "Decomposing the effects of organizational memory on marketing implementation," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 135-147, June.
    19. Kayhan Tajeddini, 2016. "Financial Orientation, Product Innovation and Firm Performance — An Empirical Study in the Japanese SMEs," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(03), pages 1-30, June.
    20. Rodrigo Martín-Rojas & Virginia Fernández-Pérez & Encarnación García-Sánchez, 0. "Encouraging organizational performance through the influence of technological distinctive competencies on components of corporate entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-30.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Marketing;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifma09:345522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.