IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ifam12/269543.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Conflicts between agriculture and society: the role of lobby groups in the animal welfare discussion and their impact on meat consumption

Author

Listed:
  • Schulze, Birgit
  • Deimel, Ingke

Abstract

Conflicts between agriculture and society are growing in industrialized countries, especially with respect to animal husbandry. Against this background, the present study has the aims to analyze the level of agreement of German citizens with the positions of animal rights, consumer protection, and farmer lobby groups and how this agreement or disagreement affects citizens’ future meat consumption. To achieve these goals, reference is made to the Framing Theory and to the Theory of Planned Behavior. The original contribution of the approach presented here is the integration of both theories in one empirical study, which gives the opportunity to put the impact of public relations activities of different lobby groups into perspective. As can be shown based on a survey among 498 consumers, the intention to reduce meat consumption is only indirectly influenced by media frames generated by lobby groups. Behavioral control and subjective norm represent the most important direct influencing factors. However, the frames, namely the moral and the economic pressure frame, have a strong impact on attitude towards meat consumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Schulze, Birgit & Deimel, Ingke, 2012. "Conflicts between agriculture and society: the role of lobby groups in the animal welfare discussion and their impact on meat consumption," 22nd International Food and Agribusiness Management Association (IFAMA) World Forum, 2012, Shanghai, China 269543, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association (IFAMA).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifam12:269543
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.269543
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/269543/files/Paper_647_IFAMA_2012_Schulze_Deimel_final.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/269543/files/Paper_647_IFAMA_2012_Schulze_Deimel_final.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.269543?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deimel, Ingke & Franz, Annabell & Spiller, Achim, 2012. "Animal Welfare: eine empirische Analyse landwirtschaftlicher Frames," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 61(02), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Deimel, Ingke & Franz, Annabell & Spiller, Achim, 2012. "Animal Welfare: eine empirische Analyse landwirtschaftlicher Frames," Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 61(2).
    3. Boehm, Justus & Kayser, Maike & Spiller, Achim, 2010. "Two Sides of the Same Coin? Analysis of the Web-Based Social Media with Regard to the Image of the Agri-Food Sector in Germany," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 1(3), pages 1-15, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Spiller, Achim & von Meyer-Höfer, Marie & Sonntag, Winnie, 2016. "Gibt es eine Zukunft für die moderne konventionelle Tierhaltung in Nordwesteuropa?," DARE Discussion Papers 1608, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    2. Purwins, Nina & Schulze-Ehlers, Birgit, 2018. "Improving market success of animal welfare programs through key stakeholder involvement: heading towards responsible innovation?," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(4).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wildraut, Christiane & Mergenthaler, Marcus, 2017. "Technik Als Beitrag Für Mehr Tierwohl In Der Schweinehaltung Aus Sicht Von Landwirten," 57th Annual Conference, Weihenstephan, Germany, September 13-15, 2017 262001, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    2. Purwins, Nina & Schulze-Ehlers, Birgit, 2016. "Determinants of pig farmers’ participation in an animal welfare program," 26th International Food and Agribusiness Management Association (IFAMA) World Forum, 2016, Aarhus, Denmark 274784, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association (IFAMA).
    3. Purwins, Nina & Schulze-Ehlers, Birgit, 2018. "Improving market success of animal welfare programs through key stakeholder involvement: heading towards responsible innovation?," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(4).
    4. Friedrich, Nina & Heyder, Matthias & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2012. "Sustainability Management in Agribusiness: Challenges, Concepts, Responsibilities and Performance," 2012 International European Forum, February 13-17, 2012, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 144979, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    5. Hirsch, Darya & Meyer, Christian H. & Massen, Cristina & Terlau, Wiltrud, 2017. "Well-informed Consumer? How do Different Consumer Groups Handle Online Information on German Animal Welfare Initiatives?," 2018 International European Forum (163rd EAAE Seminar), February 5-9, 2018, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 276934, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    6. Hirsch, Darya & Meyer, Christian H. & Massen, Cristina & Terlau, Wiltrud, 2017. "Well-informed Consumer? How do Different Consumer Groups Handle Online Information on German Animal Welfare Initiatives?," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 2017(1), June.
    7. Heise, Heinke & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2016. "What do consumers think about farm animal welfare in modern agriculture? Attitudes and shopping behaviour," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 20(3), November.
    8. GRoss, Sabine & Roosen, Jutta, 2021. "Effects of information on social trust in farmers regarding animal welfare," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 24(1).
    9. Mohr, Svenja & Höhler, Julia, 2023. "Media coverage of digitalization in agriculture - an analysis of media content," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    10. Christoph, Inken B. & Buergelt, Doreen & Salamon, Petra & Weible, Daniela & Zander, Katrin, 2012. "A Holistic Approach to Consumer Research on Expectations Regarding Animal Husbandry," 2012 International European Forum, February 13-17, 2012, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 144963, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    11. Meixner, Oliver & Haas, Rainer & Moosbrugger, Helmut & Magdits, Philipp, 2013. "Interaction with customers: The Application of Social Media within the Austrian Supply Chain for Food and Beverages," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 4(1), pages 1-12, July.
    12. Kayser, M. & Böhm, J. & Spiller, A., 2012. "Zwischen Markt und Moral – Wie wird die deutsche Land- und Ernährungswirtschaft in der Gesellschaft wahrgenommen?," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 47, March.
    13. Spiller, Achim & von Meyer-Höfer, Marie & Sonntag, Winnie, 2016. "Gibt es eine Zukunft für die moderne konventionelle Tierhaltung in Nordwesteuropa?," Department of Agricultural and Rural Development (DARE) Discussion Papers 260780, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    14. Friedrich, Nina & Heyder, Matthias & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2012. "Sustainability Management in Agribusiness: Challenges, Concepts, Responsibilities and Performance," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 3(2), pages 1-13, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifam12:269543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifamaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.