IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaae21/314961.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic Feasibility of Polyhouse Establishment with and without Government Subsidy Support: A Case of Gerbera Cultivation in Maharashtra, India

Author

Listed:
  • P, Prakash
  • Kumar, Pramod
  • Kishore, Prabhat
  • Jaganathan, D.
  • Immanuel, Sheela

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • P, Prakash & Kumar, Pramod & Kishore, Prabhat & Jaganathan, D. & Immanuel, Sheela, 2021. "Economic Feasibility of Polyhouse Establishment with and without Government Subsidy Support: A Case of Gerbera Cultivation in Maharashtra, India," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 314961, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaae21:314961
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.314961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/314961/files/0-0_Paper_18071_handout_13_0.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.314961?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N. L. Panwar & Surendra Kothari & S. C. Kaushik, 2014. "Cost-benefit and systems analysis of passively ventilated solar greenhouses for food production in arid and semi-arid regions," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 160-167, March.
    2. Ivanović, Sanjin & Nastić, Lana & Bekić, Bojana, 2015. "Possibilities Of Mirr Method Application For Evaluation Of Investments In Agriculture: An Example Of Pigs Fattening," Economics of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 62(2), pages 1-9, June.
    3. Satyasai, K.J.S., 2009. "Application of Modified Internal Rate of Return Method for Watershed Evaluation," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 22(Conferenc).
    4. Kierulff, Herbert, 2008. "MIRR: A better measure," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 321-329.
    5. Kenneth G. McClure & Paul Berhanu Girma, 2004. "Modified Net Present Value (MNPV): A New Technique for Capital Budgeting," Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 7(Special C), pages 67-82, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arnold, Uwe & Yildiz, Özgür, 2015. "Economic risk analysis of decentralized renewable energy infrastructures – A Monte Carlo Simulation approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 227-239.
    2. Lachaud, Michée A. & Bravo-Ureta, Boris E., 2022. "A Bayesian statistical analysis of return to agricultural R&D investment in Latin America: Implications for food security," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    3. Sina Atari & Yassine Bakkar & Eunice Omolola Olaniyi & Gunnar Prause, 2019. "Real options analysis of abatement investments for sulphur emission control compliance," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(3), pages 1062-1087, March.
    4. Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2016. "Capital depreciation and the underdetermination of rate of return: A unifying perspective," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 54-79.
    5. Gabriel Browne de Deus Ribeiro & Maria das Dores Saraiva De Loreto & Edna Lopes Miranda & Rosária Cal Bastos & Catariny Cabral Aleman & Fernando França da Cunha & Paola Delatorre Rodrigues, 2024. "The Use of Financial Tools in Small-Scale Irrigated Crops to Assess Socioeconomic Sustainability: A Case Study in Tocantins-Araguaia Basin, Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-15, February.
    6. Ku McMahan & Saad Usmani, 2022. "The Economic Benefits of Supporting Private Social Enterprise at the Nexus of Water and Agriculture: A Social Rate of Return Analysis of the Securing Water for Food Grand Challenge for Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, May.
    7. Cuthbert, James R. & Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2016. "Measuring the inadequacy of IRR in PFI schemes using profitability index and AIRR," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 130-140.
    8. Kerchner, Charles D. & Keeton, William S., 2015. "California's regulatory forest carbon market: Viability for northeast landowners," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 70-81.
    9. Carlos Omar Trejo-Pech & James A. Larson & Burton C. English & T. Edward Yu, 2019. "Cost and Profitability Analysis of a Prospective Pennycress to Sustainable Aviation Fuel Supply Chain in Southern USA," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-18, August.
    10. Mahmoud Isied & Sahand Daneshvar, 2024. "A Second Chance for Failed Projects Using Data Envelopment Analysis Based on Project Attractiveness Factors," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-33, November.
    11. Carlo Alberto Magni, 2010. "Average Internal Rate of Return and investment decisions: A new perspective," Centro Studi di Banca e Finanza (CEFIN) (Center for Studies in Banking and Finance) 0021, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi".
    12. Souza, Sulma Vanessa & Gimenes, Régio Marcio Toesca & Binotto, Erlaine, 2019. "Economic viability for deploying hydroponic system in emerging countries: A differentiated risk adjustment proposal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 357-369.
    13. Hakizimana, Jean de Dieu K. & Kim, Hyung-Taek, 2016. "Peat briquette as an alternative to cooking fuel: A techno-economic viability assessment in Rwanda," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 453-464.
    14. Andrey Leonidov & Ilya Tipunin & Ekaterina Serebryannikova, 2020. "On Evaluation of Risky Investment Projects. Investment Certainty Equivalence," Papers 2005.12173, arXiv.org.
    15. Dalton, Gordon & Allan, Grant & Beaumont, Nicola & Georgakaki, Aliki & Hacking, Nick & Hooper, Tara & Kerr, Sandy & O’Hagan, Anne Marie & Reilly, Kieran & Ricci, Pierpaolo & Sheng, Wanan & Stallard, T, 2015. "Economic and socio-economic assessment methods for ocean renewable energy: Public and private perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 850-878.
    16. Rasheed, Rizwan & Khan, Naghman & Yasar, Abdullah & Su, Yuehong & Tabinda, Amtul Bari, 2016. "Design and cost-benefit analysis of a novel anaerobic industrial bioenergy plant in Pakistan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 242-247.
    17. M. Mohebi Bijarpas & T. Rostami Shahraji & S. Mohammadi Limaei, 2015. "Socioeconomic evaluation of agroforestry systems (Case study: Northern Iran)," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(11), pages 478-484.
    18. Xudong Rao & Terrance M. Hurley & Philip G. Pardey, 2020. "Recalibrating the reported returns to agricultural R&D: what if we all heeded Griliches?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(3), pages 977-1001, July.
    19. Aringo, Marielle Q. & Ella, Victor B. & Martinez, Camille G. & Pereira, Gamiello S., 2022. "Ex-ante Cost-Benefit Analysis of High-end and Low-cost Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) Technology Packages for Efficient Irrigation Water Management in the Philippines," Journal of Economics, Management & Agricultural Development, Journal of Economics, Management & Agricultural Development (JEMAD), vol. 8(2), December.
    20. Ben-Horin, Moshe & Kroll, Yoram, 2017. "A simple intuitive NPV-IRR consistent ranking," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 108-114.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy; Crop Production/Industries;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaae21:314961. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.