IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaae06/25740.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Impact of Research Investment on Technology Development and Total Factor Productivity in Major Field Crops of Peninsular India

Author

Listed:
  • Ananth, G.S.
  • Chengappa, P.G.
  • Janaiah, Aldas

Abstract

Increase in agricultural productivity is induced by public investment in research. Several studies have analyzed the impact of research investment at the national level but such analyses at the state or regional level are a few. The present study is an attempt to analyze the pattern and quantify the returns to research investment made over a period of 25 years on major field crops such as rice, jowar, finger millet (ragi), red gram, groundnut, sunflower, cotton and sugarcane in a predominantly agrarian state of Karnataka in peninsular India. The impact of research investment was assessed in terms of technology developed and growth in total factor productivity. The agricultural research investment had profound effect on the development of technologies relating to crop varieties, plant protection and crop management: dominant in cereals and associated with higher research investments, which is in tune with the national objective of achieving food security. Consequently, the rate of return to research investment is quite high in case of rice and sugarcane, moderate for finger millet, cotton and jowar, negative in red gram, groundnut and sunflower. The TFP growth is also higher in crops that attracted higher research investments due to growth in yield as a result of continuous upgradation of technologies. There is a need to achieve higher level of productivity through enhanced research investment for most crops in the state particularly for pulses and oilseeds in order to achieve nutritional security as the state is already food secured.

Suggested Citation

  • Ananth, G.S. & Chengappa, P.G. & Janaiah, Aldas, 2006. "Impact of Research Investment on Technology Development and Total Factor Productivity in Major Field Crops of Peninsular India," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25740, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaae06:25740
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.25740
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/25740/files/pp061338.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.25740?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tim J. Coelli & D. S. Prasada Rao, 2005. "Total factor productivity growth in agriculture: a Malmquist index analysis of 93 countries, 1980–2000," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 32(s1), pages 115-134, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Changjun Zheng & Sinamenye Jean-Petit, 2023. "The Effects of the Interactions Between Agro-Production, Economic, and Financial Development on Bank Sustainability," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    2. Nasir nadeem, Dr. & khalid Mushtaq, Dr., 2010. "Role of Agricultural Research and Extension in Enhancing Agricultural Productivity in Punjab, Pakistan," MPRA Paper 27769, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaraitė, Jūratė & Di Maria, Corrado, 2012. "Efficiency, productivity and environmental policy: A case study of power generation in the EU," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1557-1568.
    2. Valentin Zelenyuk, 2023. "Productivity analysis: roots, foundations, trends and perspectives," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 229-247, December.
    3. Rongrong Zhou & Hanzhou Liu & Qian Zhang & Wei Wang & Jian Mao & Xuerong Wang & Decai Tang, 2023. "Improvement of Agricultural Supply Quality in China: Evidence from Jiangsu Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-29, July.
    4. Kantelhardt, Jochen & Kapfer, Martin & Franzel, Martin & Kirchweger, Stefan, 2013. "Development of Efficiency in Alpine Farming - A Combination of the Malmquist Index Approach and Matching–," 53rd Annual Conference, Berlin, Germany, September 25-27, 2013 156136, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    5. Sheng, Yu & Xu, Xinpeng, 2019. "The productivity impact of climate change: Evidence from Australia's Millennium drought," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 182-191.
    6. Kainth, Gursharan Singh & Bawa, Rajinder Singh, 2013. "Are Disparities in Indian Agriculture Growing? Status, Constraints and Determinants," Working Papers 253314, Guru Arjan Dev Institute of Development Studies (IDSAsr).
    7. Majiwa, Eucabeth Bosibori Opande & Lee, Boon & Wilson, Clevo, 2015. "Multi-lateral multi-output measurement of productivity: the case of African agriculture," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212769, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. J.Ph. Boussemart & K. Kerstens & S. Blancard & W. Briec, 2007. "Technology Adoption in French Agriculture and the role of Financial Constraints," Post-Print hal-00287974, HAL.
    9. M. Danquah & B. Ouattara, 2014. "Productivity Growth, Human Capital And Distance To Frontier In Sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 39(4), pages 27-48, December.
    10. Ma, Shuzhong & Feng, Han, 2013. "Will the decline of efficiency in China's agriculture come to an end? An analysis based on opening and convergence," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 179-190.
    11. Adewumi, Matthew Olaniyi & Animashaun, Jubril Olayinka, 2013. "Households’ Dietary Diversity, Farm Income and Technical Efficiency Correlates: Empirical Evidence from Small-scale Farming Households in Nigeria," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 5(4), pages 1-9, December.
    12. Qinqin Fan & Tianyuan Mu & Wei Jia, 2021. "Analysis on the Trend and Factors of Total Factor Productivity of Agricultural Export Enterprises in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, June.
    13. Kyunghoon Kim & Andy Sumner & Arief Anshory Yusuf, 2018. "Is structural transformation-led economic growth immiserising or inclusive? The case of Indonesia," Departmental Working Papers 2018-11, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.
    14. Md Aslam Mia & V. G. R. Chandran, 2016. "Measuring Financial and Social Outreach Productivity of Microfinance Institutions in Bangladesh," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 505-527, June.
    15. Leakey, Roger & Kranjac-Berisavljevic, Gordana & Caron, Patrick & Craufurd, Peter & Martin, Adrienne M. & McDonald, Andy & Abedini, Walter & Afiff, Suraya & Bakurin, Ndey & Bass, Steve & Hilbeck, Ange, 2009. "Impacts of AKST on development and sustainability goals," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    16. Dietrich, Jan Philipp & Schmitz, Christoph & Müller, Christoph & Fader, Marianela & Lotze-Campen, Hermann & Popp, Alexander, 2012. "Measuring agricultural land-use intensity – A global analysis using a model-assisted approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 109-118.
    17. Scheierling, Susanne M. & Treguer, David O. & Booker, James F. & Decker, Elisabeth, 2014. "How to assess agricultural water productivity ? looking for water in the agricultural productivity and efficiency literature," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6982, The World Bank.
    18. Nin Pratt, Alejandro & Yu, Bingxin, 2008. "An updated look at the recovery of agricultural productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa:," IFPRI discussion papers 787, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    19. Chatterjee, Soumitra & Dhehibi, Boubaker & Karak, Sabyasachi & Hazra, Soumavho & Nath, Rajib & Sarker, Ashutosh, 2021. "Economic Impact of Lentil Cultivation on Marginal and Small Farm Households in Eastern India," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 314951, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Jinkai Li & Jueying Chen & Heguang Liu, 2021. "Sustainable Agricultural Total Factor Productivity and Its Spatial Relationship with Urbanization in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-15, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaae06:25740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.