IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/gewi17/262156.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Mind The Gap: Determinanten Der Diskrepanz Von Verbrauchereinstellung Und Kaufverhalten Am Beispiel Gentechnikfreier Trinkmilch

Author

Listed:
  • Jankowski, Anne Katharina
  • Höhler, Julia

Abstract

Die Ablehnung von Gentechnik in Verbraucherumfragen ist groß. Gleichzeitig zeigen die Marktdaten für gentechnikfreie Milch ein anderes Bild. Die Diskrepanz zwischen Verbrauchereinstellung und –verhalten gibt Anlass für eine empirische Untersuchung möglicher Einflussfaktoren, die Verbraucher daran hindern, gentechnikfreie Milch zu kaufen. Die Ergebnisse der auf einem Choice Experiment basierenden logistischen Regression zeigen, dass neben der Einstellung soziodemografische Faktoren, wie Alter, Geschlecht, Bildungsstand und der Ort des Aufwachsens das Kaufverhalten beeinflussen. Des Weiteren können konkrete Handlungspläne, Verunsicherung der Konsumenten hinsichtlich Gentechnik und die direkte Erkennbarkeit der Produkte als Einflussfaktoren identifiziert werden. Mit steigendem subjektiven Wissen und Bildungsstand sinkt die Kaufbereitschaft für gentechnikfreie Milch.

Suggested Citation

  • Jankowski, Anne Katharina & Höhler, Julia, 2017. "Mind The Gap: Determinanten Der Diskrepanz Von Verbrauchereinstellung Und Kaufverhalten Am Beispiel Gentechnikfreier Trinkmilch," 57th Annual Conference, Weihenstephan, Germany, September 13-15, 2017 262156, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:gewi17:262156
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.262156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/262156/files/Jankowski_125.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/262156/files/Jankowski_125.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.262156?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    2. Michal Carrington & Benjamin Neville & Gregory Whitwell, 2010. "Why Ethical Consumers Don’t Walk Their Talk: Towards a Framework for Understanding the Gap Between the Ethical Purchase Intentions and Actual Buying Behaviour of Ethically Minded Consumers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 97(1), pages 139-158, November.
    3. Costa-Font, Montserrat & Gil, José M. & Traill, W. Bruce, 2008. "Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 99-111, April.
    4. Carmen Valor, 2008. "Can Consumers Buy Responsibly? Analysis and Solutions for Market Failures," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 315-326, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maja Hosta & Vesna Žabkar, 2016. "Consumer Sustainability and Responsibility: Beyond Green and Ethical Consumption," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 28(2), pages 143-157.
    2. Ondřej Částek & Linda Plaváková, 2018. "Human Values as Determinants of Fairtrade Consumption in the Czech Republic," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 66(2), pages 465-478.
    3. Carrington, Michal J. & Neville, Benjamin A. & Whitwell, Gregory J., 2014. "Lost in translation: Exploring the ethical consumer intention–behavior gap," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 2759-2767.
    4. Simona Cosma & Paola Schwizer & Lorenzo Nobile & Rossella Leopizzi, 2021. "Environmental attitude in the board. Who are the “green directors”? Evidences from Italy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3360-3375, November.
    5. Ertz, Myriam & Karakas, Fahri & Sarigöllü, Emine, 2016. "Exploring pro-environmental behaviors of consumers: An analysis of contextual factors, attitude, and behaviors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 3971-3980.
    6. Pranav Kumar & Sany Sanuri Mohd. Mokhtar, 2016. "Ethical Marketing Practices viewed through Consumer Spectacles," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 28(1), pages 29-45.
    7. Volker Lingnau & Florian Fuchs & Florian Beham, 2019. "The impact of sustainability in coffee production on consumers’ willingness to pay–new evidence from the field of ethical consumption," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 65-93, April.
    8. Ching-Hua Yeh & Monika Hartmann, 2021. "To Purchase or Not to Purchase? Drivers of Consumers’ Preferences for Animal Welfare in Their Meat Choice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-25, August.
    9. Lianne Foti & Avis Devine, 2019. "High Involvement and Ethical Consumption: A Study of the Environmentally Certified Home Purchase Decision," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-11, September.
    10. Fred Amofa Yamoah & Rachel Duffy & Dan Petrovici & Andrew Fearne, 2016. "Towards a Framework for Understanding Fairtrade Purchase Intention in the Mainstream Environment of Supermarkets," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 181-197, June.
    11. Nieves García-de-Frutos & José Manuel Ortega-Egea & Javier Martínez-del-Río, 2018. "Anti-consumption for Environmental Sustainability: Conceptualization, Review, and Multilevel Research Directions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 411-435, March.
    12. Micael-Lee Johnstone & Lay Tan, 2015. "Exploring the Gap Between Consumers’ Green Rhetoric and Purchasing Behaviour," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(2), pages 311-328, December.
    13. Brahim Chekima & Mohamed Bouteraa & Rudy Ansar & Suddin Lada & Lim Ming Fook & Elhachemi Tamma & Azaze-Azizi Abdul Adis & Khadidja Chekima, 2023. "Determinants of Organic Food Consumption in Narrowing the Green Gap," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, May.
    14. Zhengxia He & Yanqing Zhou & Jianming Wang & Cunfang Li & Meiling Wang & Wenbo Li, 2021. "The impact of motivation, intention, and contextual factors on green purchasing behavior: New energy vehicles as an example," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1249-1269, February.
    15. Alex Hiller & Tony Woodall, 2019. "Everything Flows: A Pragmatist Perspective of Trade-Offs and Value in Ethical Consumption," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(4), pages 893-912, July.
    16. Nguyen, The Ninh & Lobo, Antonio & Greenland, Steven, 2016. "Pro-environmental purchase behaviour: The role of consumers' biospheric values," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 98-108.
    17. Chorong Youn & So‐young Kim & Yuri Lee & Ho Jung Choo & Seyoon Jang & Jae Im Jang, 2017. "Measuring Retailers' Sustainable Development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 385-398, March.
    18. Yadav, Rambalak & Pathak, Govind S., 2017. "Determinants of Consumers' Green Purchase Behavior in a Developing Nation: Applying and Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 114-122.
    19. Thapa Karki, Shova & Hubacek, Klaus, 2015. "Developing a conceptual framework for the attitude–intention–behaviour links driving illegal resource extraction in Bardia National Park, Nepal," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 129-139.
    20. Ervin L. Black & F. Greg Burton & Joshua K. Cieslewicz, 2022. "Improving Ethics: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior to Include Moral Disengagement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(4), pages 945-978, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Consumer/Household Economics; Livestock Production/Industries; Marketing;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gewi17:262156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gewisea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.