IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaae67/241740.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Agency relationships in PDO products management: the role of economic associations

Author

Listed:
  • Martino, Gaetano

Abstract

The study aims to introduce a simple theoretical view concerning agency relationships in agrifood chains, by considering an association of olive oil producers whose behaviour is the basis of the theoretical view. The circumstances, which are firstly taken into account in the analysis are : a) a large number of small farms is involved in producing the raw agricultural product; b) a high degree of heterogeneity usually affects the raw agricultural product; c) the final demand is supported by consumers who are able to assess differences in the quality of the final product d) the PDO (Protected Designation of Origin) label reduces drastically the possibility of substituting the raw agricultural product. Therefore, the co-ordination process among economic agents has to support the concentration of the agricultural product and ensure the particular features of the final product. This means that the co-ordination process have also to include solutions to the problems related to the goals of the consumers. If the features of the agricultural raw material do not correspond to the need of the PDO production process, then an asymmetric information occurs between the farmers and the agents of the processing stage. Thus, the hypothesis that the heterogeneity of the raw agricultural product should be more efficiently managed by an agency relationship rather than by a market process is discussed. An association of producers could define a principal-agent relationship with agents of the processing stage. The association (principal) can stipulate a contract with the management of the processing stage (agent) and specify its needs to meet fully the PDO conditions and satisfy the final consumers. Therefore, the association and the contract are assumed as basic elements of the institutional dimension of the coordination process.

Suggested Citation

  • Martino, Gaetano, 1999. "Agency relationships in PDO products management: the role of economic associations," 67th Seminar, October 28-30, 1999, LeMans, France 241740, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaae67:241740
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.241740
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/241740/files/Martino%20_1999_%20Agency%20relationships%20in%20PDO%20products%20management_%20the%20role%20of%20economic%20associations.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.241740?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rees, Ray, 1985. "The Theory of Principal and Agent: Part 1," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 3-26, January.
    2. Geoffrey M. Hodgson, 1998. "The Approach of Institutional Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 36(1), pages 166-192, March.
    3. Mas-Colell, Andreu & Whinston, Michael D. & Green, Jerry R., 1995. "Microeconomic Theory," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195102680.
    4. Rees, Ray, 1985. "The Theory of Principal and Agent: Part 2," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 75-95, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bender, Klaus & Richter, Andreas, 2002. "Optimales Vertragsdesign bei moralischem Risiko in der Rückversicherung," Working Papers on Risk and Insurance 9, University of Hamburg, Institute for Risk and Insurance.
    2. Wang, Sen & Bogle, Tim & van Kooten, G. Cornelis, 2012. "Forestry and the New Institutional Economics," Working Papers 130818, University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy.
    3. Olsson, Ola, 2000. "A Microeconomic Analysis of Institutions," Working Papers in Economics 25, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    4. Thiele, Veikko, 2007. "Task-Specific Abilities in Multi-Task Agency Relations," MPRA Paper 2470, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Nell, Martin & Richter, Andreas, 2002. "Improving risk allocation through cat bonds," Working Papers on Risk and Insurance 10, University of Hamburg, Institute for Risk and Insurance.
    6. Ebrahim Soltani & Jawad Syed & Ying-Ying Liao & Abdullah Iqbal, 2015. "Managerial Mindsets Toward Corporate Social Responsibility: The Case of Auto Industry in Iran," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 129(4), pages 795-810, July.
    7. Finardi, Corrado & Pellegrini, Giuseppe & Rowe, Gene, 2012. "Food safety issues: From Enlightened Elitism towards Deliberative Democracy? An overview of EFSA’s “Public Consultation” instrument," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 427-438.
    8. Welde, Morten & Odeck, James, 2011. "The efficiency of Norwegian road toll companies," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 162-171.
    9. Evangelos Mitrokostas & Emmanuel Petrakis, 2014. "Organizational structure, strategic delegation and innovation in oligopolistic industries," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 1-24, January.
    10. Brendan Markey-Towler, 2018. "A formal psychological theory for evolutionary economics," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 691-725, September.
    11. Eran Vigoda-Gadot & Yair Zalmanovitch & Alex Belonogov, 2012. "Public Servants’ Trust in Citizens: An Extension of Theory and an Empirical Examination with Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 383-399, December.
    12. Lee, Kangoh, 1995. "Optimal retail lease contracts: the principal-agent approach," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 727-738, December.
    13. Erich Renz & Marvin M. Müller & Kim Leonardo Böhm, 2023. "When nudges promote neutral behavior: an experimental study of managerial decisions under risk and uncertainty," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(8), pages 1309-1354, October.
    14. George Chorafakis, 2013. "The Knowledge Plexus," Vernon Press Titles in Economics, Vernon Art and Science Inc, edition 1, number 23.
    15. George Chorafakis, 2013. "The Knowledge Plexus [Paperback edition]," Vernon Press Titles in Economics, Vernon Art and Science Inc, edition 1, number 2.
    16. Kotrba, Vojtěch, 2019. "Direct preferences of sports fans: Is there a superstar effect in the fantasy league?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 89-97.
    17. Di Gropello, Emanuela, 1999. "Educational decentralization models in Latin America," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), August.
    18. Stephan Bartke & Reimund Schwarze, 2021. "The Economic Role and Emergence of Professional Valuers in Real Estate Markets," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, June.
    19. Shasikanta Nandeibam, 1994. "A free-rider problem with a free-riding principal," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 1(1), pages 227-250, December.
    20. Bartsch, Elga, 1996. "Enforcement of environmental liability in the case of uncertain causality and asymmetric information," Kiel Working Papers 755, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaae67:241740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.