IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaa116/95210.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Hedonic Pricing Evaluation on Agritourism Activity in Italy: Local Culture-based or Facility-based?

Author

Listed:
  • Ohe, Yasuo
  • Ciani, Adriano

Abstract

This paper focused on how and what diversified activities influence the price level of agritourism. A hypothesis that contrasts two directions was examined: facility-based and local culture-based activities. First, from the conceptual consideration, we defined that agritourism based on local cultural resources can internalize positive externalities, which are accompanied by local cultural resources, into income, unlike facility-based activity that has no connection with local cultural resources. Second, the results of estimations from the price determinant ordered logit model clarified that owning a swimming pool was the most common and influential factor in enhancing the price level while regional diversity was observed in terms of local cultural resource-based activities such as restaurants, world heritage sites and DOC wines. These findings indicate that hardware-based evolution is more effective in the short term than evolution based on software aspects. Nevertheless, this hardware-based evolution of agritourism is implicitly based on the assumption of continuously growing demand and sufficient financial capability for the fixed investment. When growth in demand becomes stagnant, facility installation can be a heavy burden on operators. Consequently, for the sustainable development of agritourism it will be necessary to harness locality to create a balance between facility-based services and local culture-based services.

Suggested Citation

  • Ohe, Yasuo & Ciani, Adriano, 2010. "Hedonic Pricing Evaluation on Agritourism Activity in Italy: Local Culture-based or Facility-based?," 116th Seminar, October 27-30, 2010, Parma, Italy 95210, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaa116:95210
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.95210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/95210/files/paper%20completo%20113.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.95210?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Isabel Vanslembrouck & Guido Van Huylenbroeck & J. Van Meensel, 2005. "Impact of Agriculture on Rural Tourism: A Hedonic Pricing Approach," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 17-30, March.
    2. Belletti, Giovanni & Burgassi, Tunia & Manco, Elisabetta & Marescotti, Andrea & Pacciani, Alessandro & Scaramuzzi, Silvia, 2007. "The roles of geographical indications (PDO and PGI) on the internationalisation process of agro-food products," 105th Seminar, March 8-10, 2007, Bologna, Italy 7851, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yasuo Ohe & Adriano Ciani, 2011. "Evaluation of Agritourism Activity in Italy: Facility Based or Local Culture Based?," Tourism Economics, , vol. 17(3), pages 581-601, June.
    2. Anne-Kathrin LAST, 2008. "The Monetary Value of Cultural Goods: A Contingent Valuation Study of the Municipal Supply of Cultural Goods in Lueneburg, Germany," EcoMod2008 23800074, EcoMod.
    3. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2015-002 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Kummitha, Harshavardhan Reddy & Huseynov, Raqif & Wojtaszek, Michał, 2018. "Development of Agritourism in the Light of Economics: Case Studies of Italy and Poland," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 18(33, Part ), March.
    5. Ohe, Yasuo, 2008. "Evaluating the Diversifying Market for and Viability of Rural Tourism Activity in Japan," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 43647, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Peter Howley & Trevor Donnellan & Kevin Hanrahan, 2009. "CAP reform post 2013: Examining the equity dimensions of agricultural support," Working Papers 0902, Rural Economy and Development Programme,Teagasc.
    7. Živojinović, I. & Weiss, G. & Wilding, M. & Wong, J.L.G. & Ludvig, A., 2020. "Experiencing forest products – An innovation trend by rural entrepreneurs," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    8. Viglia, Giampaolo & Abrate, Graziano, 2017. "When distinction does not pay off - Investigating the determinants of European agritourism prices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 45-52.
    9. Bilbao-Terol, Amelia & Bilbao-Terol, Celia, 2024. "The Choquet integral supported by a hedonic approach for modelling preferences in hotel selection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    10. Gabriela Mendoza-González & M. Luisa Martínez & Roger Guevara & Octavio Pérez-Maqueo & María Cristina Garza-Lagler & Alan Howard, 2018. "Towards a Sustainable Sun, Sea, and Sand Tourism: The Value of Ocean View and Proximity to the Coast," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, March.
    11. Stephanie Truchet & Jean-Marc Callois & Francis Aubert & Virginie Piguet, 2011. "Amenities and location of hotels: a micro-economic model and estimations," ERSA conference papers ersa10p904, European Regional Science Association.
    12. Bianca Biagi & Maria Giovanna Brandano & Steven B. Caudill, 2016. "Tourism and house prices in Italy," Tourism Economics, , vol. 22(5), pages 964-978, October.
    13. Massimiliano Giacalone & Vito Santarcangelo & Vincenzo Donvito & Oriana Schiavone & Emilio Massa, 2021. "Big data for corporate social responsibility: blockchain use in Gioia del Colle DOP," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(6), pages 1945-1971, December.
    14. Rosa Maria Fanelli & Luca Romagnoli, 2020. "Customer Satisfaction with Farmhouse Facilities and Its Implications for the Promotion of Agritourism Resources in Italian Municipalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, February.
    15. Peter Howley & Trevor Donnellan & Kevin Hanrahan, 2009. "The 2003 CAP reform: Do decoupled payments affect agricultural production?," Working Papers 0901, Rural Economy and Development Programme,Teagasc.
    16. Woojae Kim & Sungmin Ko & Myoungjin Oh & Ie-jung Choi & Jungwoo Shin, 2019. "Is an Incentive Policy for Energy Efficient Products Effective for Air Purifiers? The Case of South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-14, May.
    17. Marius-Ionuț Gordan & Valentina Constanța Tudor & Cosmin Alin Popescu & Tabita Cornelia Adamov & Elena Peț & Ioana Anda Milin & Tiberiu Iancu, 2024. "Hedonic Pricing Models in Rural Tourism: Analyzing Factors Influencing Accommodation Pricing in Romania Using Geographically Weighted Regression," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, July.
    18. Olivier JOALLAND & Tina RAMBONILAZA, 2017. "Assessing the impact of renewable energy infrastructure on the “tourist value” in rural landscapes: a spatial hedonic approach," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2017-10, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    19. Celia Bilbao-Terol & Verónica Cañal-Fernández & Luis Valdés & Eduardo Del Valle, 2017. "Rural Tourism Accommodation Prices by Land Use-Based Hedonic Approach: First Results from the Case Study of the Self-Catering Cottages in Asturias," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-17, September.
    20. Liljenstolpe, Carolina, 2011. "Valuation of environmental impacts of the Rural Development Program - A hedonic model with application of GIS," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114383, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    21. Fayet, Catherine M.J. & Reilly, Kate H. & Van Ham, Chantal & Verburg, Peter H., 2022. "What is the future of abandoned agricultural lands? A systematic review of alternative trajectories in Europe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Agricultural and Food Policy; Community/Rural/Urban Development; Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety; Labor and Human Capital;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaa116:95210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.