IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cudarb/122826.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Role of the Supermarket Buyer

Author

Listed:
  • McLaughlin, Edward W.
  • Perosio, Debra J.

Abstract

This study investigates the standard procurement and merchandising practices of wholesale and retail supermarket dairy buyers in New York State. Although much anecdotal and trade information exists regarding how wholesale/retail buyers make decisions, their standard operating practices have not previously been well documented. Yet these decisions and resulting strategies at wholesale/ retail levels can significantly enhance or diminish marketing initiatives and, in particular, the impact of advertising and promotion programs of the dairy industry. The primary data for this study were gathered from dairy directors and buyers from 17 wholesale and retail supermarket companies serving New York State. Mail surveys were employed to determine the factors that influence dairy buyers in their decision making. Additionally, a number of dairy industry leaders were interviewed to assist with interpretation of the survey data. The empirical results and analysis of the study are presented in Section 3. They are categorized into seven principal themes: • Dairy buyer profile • Dairy department structure and operations • Dairy department performance and pricing • New product status in the dairy department • Promotional activities in the dairy department • Buyers' perceptions of dairy suppliers • Impact of legislation on dairy department operations Strategic implications of the study results are elaborated in Section 3 and summarized in Section 4. These perspectives are intended to assist dairy suppliers in their quest to improve industry understanding of their wholesale/ retail customers. Among the key findings: • a shift in emphasis is occurring-away from the buying function alone to bottom line category profitability through the implementation of category management in the dairy department • despite flat sales in the dairy department, as new stores are built and older stores remodeled, buyers expect the dairy department to expand by over 14 percent • labor productivity in the dairy department appears to be the highest of any major department in the supermarket • despite industry urging, direct product profit analysis has not been widely adopted as a dairy department evaluation tool • over one-third of supermarket "dairy" department sales are from non milk-based products 0, • "price" alone is not an important factor when considering new products or potential suppliers • relatively large volume increases can be motivated in the dairy department by various non-price merchandising approaches Dairy Department Procurement Dynamics • supplier willingness to tailor promotional programs to retailer needs is viewed as critically important by dairy buyers • the dairy category lags behind most other categories in the supermarket in new product introductions • there are striking and significant differences in how large supermarket firm (annual sales over $1 billion) and small supermarket firm (annual sales less than $1 billion) dairy buyers view and manage the dairy department These and other findings present numerous opportunities for positive responses from dairy suppliers/processors. This type of in-depth knowledge of customer behavior and decision-making criteria allows forward thinking companies to develop successful sales and marketing strategies. This research suggests that closer supplier-buyer relationships and alliances are not simply needed to prosper, but necessary to survive.

Suggested Citation

  • McLaughlin, Edward W. & Perosio, Debra J., 1996. "The Role of the Supermarket Buyer," Research Bulletins 122826, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cudarb:122826
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.122826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/122826/files/Cornell_Dyson_rb9606.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.122826?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. German, Gene A. & Perosio, Debra J., 1991. "Item Pricing in New York State," EB Series 186191, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    2. German, Gene A. & Hawkes, Gerard F. & Perosio, Debra J., 1993. "Supercenters: The Emerging Force in Food Retailing," EB Series 186246, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    3. Fredericks, Peter J. & McLaughlin, Edward W., 1992. "New Product Procurement: A Summary of Buying Practices and Acceptance Criteria at U.S. Supermarket Chains," Research Bulletins 123087, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    4. Jagmohan S. Raju, 1992. "The Effect of Price Promotions on Variability in Product Category Sales," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 207-220.
    5. McLaughlin, Edward W. & Hawkes, Gerard F. & Perosio, Debra J. & Russo, David M., 1992. "State of the New York Food Industry," Research Bulletins 123078, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    6. McLaughlin, Edward W. & Perosio, Debra J., 1994. "Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Procurement Dynamics: The Role of the Supermarket Buyer," Research Bulletins 123000, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chanjin Chung & Todd M. Schmit & Diansheng Dong & Harry M. Kaiser, 2007. "Economic evaluation of shelf-space management in grocery stores," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(4), pages 583-597.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Park, Kristen & Perosio, Debra & German, Gene A. & McLaughlin, Edward W., 1996. "What's In Store for Home Shopping?," EB Series 186335, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    2. Putsis, William Jr. & Dhar, Ravi, 2001. "An empirical analysis of the determinants of category expenditure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 277-291, June.
    3. David R. Bell & Jeongwen Chiang & V. Padmanabhan, 1999. "The Decomposition of Promotional Response: An Empirical Generalization," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 504-526.
    4. Andrés Elberg & Pedro M. Gardete & Rosario Macera & Carlos Noton, 2019. "Dynamic effects of price promotions: field evidence, consumer search, and supply-side implications," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-58, March.
    5. D. VAN DEN POEL & Jan J. DE SCHAMPHELAERE & G. WETS, 2003. "Direct and Indirect Effects of Retail Promotions," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 03/202, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    6. McLaughlin, Edward W. & Perosio, Debra J., 1994. "Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Procurement Dynamics: The Role of the Supermarket Buyer," Research Bulletins 123000, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    7. Bogomolova, Svetlana & Dunn, Steven & Trinh, Giang & Taylor, Jennifer & Volpe, Richard J., 2015. "Price promotion landscape in the US and UK: Depicting retail practice to inform future research agenda," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 1-11.
    8. Walters, Rockney G. & Bommer, William, 1996. "Measuring the Impact of Product and Promotion-Related Factors on Product Category Price Elasticities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 203-216, July.
    9. Gauri, Dinesh K. & Ratchford, Brian & Pancras, Joseph & Talukdar, Debabrata, 2017. "An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Promotional Discounts on Store Performance," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 93(3), pages 283-303.
    10. Vincent R. Nijs & Shuba Srinivasan & Koen Pauwels, 2007. "Retail-Price Drivers and Retailer Profits," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 473-487, 07-08.
    11. Fok, D. & Paap, R. & Franses, Ph.H.B.F., 2003. "Modeling Dynamic Effects of the Marketing Mix on Market Shares," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2003-044-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    12. Deleersnyder, B. & Dekimpe, M.G. & Steenkamp, J.E.B.M. & Koll, O., 2007. "Win-win strategies at discount stores," Other publications TiSEM 34fbe624-0ee7-4c52-b640-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Haans, Hans & Gijsbrechts, Els, 2011. "“One-deal-fits-all?” On Category Sales Promotion Effectiveness in Smaller versus Larger Supermarkets," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 87(4), pages 427-443.
    14. Koen Pauwels & Shuba Srinivasan & Philip Hans Franses, 2007. "When Do Price Thresholds Matter in Retail Categories?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 83-100, 01-02.
    15. Vincent R. Nijs & Marnik G. Dekimpe & Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamps & Dominique M. Hanssens, 2001. "The Category-Demand Effects of Price Promotions," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 1-22, September.
    16. Marc Fischer & Hyun S. Shin & Dominique M. Hanssens, 2016. "Brand Performance Volatility from Marketing Spending," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(1), pages 197-215, January.
    17. Valenti, Albert & Yildirim, Gokhan & Vanhuele, Marc & Srinivasan, Shuba & Pauwels, Koen, 2023. "Advertising’s sequence of effects on consumer mindset and sales: A comparison across brands and product categories," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 435-454.
    18. G Baltas, 2005. "Modelling category demand in retail chains," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(11), pages 1258-1264, November.
    19. Vijay Ganesh Hariharan & Ram Bezawada & Debabrata Talukdar, 2015. "Aggregate Impact of Different Brand Development Strategies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1164-1182, May.
    20. Foekens, Eijte W. & S.H. Leeflang, Peter & Wittink, Dick R., 1998. "Varying parameter models to accommodate dynamic promotion effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 89(1-2), pages 249-268, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Consumer/Household Economics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cudarb:122826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dacorus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.