IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cmpart/334761.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Coordination strategies in the South African egg value chain: A review of chain performance and fragility

Author

Listed:
  • Setene, Letlama

Abstract

The chain players in the South African egg industry pursue increased coordination which results in strategies that are lean and vertically integrated. These strategies include contracts specifications, vertical integration, the formation of alliances based on equity and relation. The strategies reduce transaction costs and risks the industry’s value chain to improve its chain performance. These strategies improve chain performance and competitive advantage of business only under certain environmental circumstances. This dissertation argued that under uncertainty the strategies become fragile due to the interdependencies between chain players. The interdependencies expose the industry’s role players to unforeseen disruptive events that are detrimental to business continuity. The events are seemly rising and are associated with uncertainty which has a low probability of occurring but a large impact if it occurs. The uncertainty drives the chain vulnerability which accelerates throughout the whole chain as a harmful stressor, and that is referred to as chain fragility. This study aimed to display the most common strategies of coordination in the South African egg industry and the map of its egg value chain. The strategies were divided into two configurations based on the levels of interdependencies between their chain players, which were either high levels or low levels. Then, the fragility measure of both configurations was performed, together with their comparative fragility analysis. The aim was reached by using vi the heuristic stress-testing approach, which represented 17 chain fragility factors. A questionnaire was sent to the chain players in the South African egg industry and got completed by a sample size of 73 respondents, mainly retailers, egg producers and pullet rearers. The respondents were required to rate fragility factors as adverse events against their business continuity as they progressively deteriorated. The results showed the fragility scores of each factor and their imperativeness to each chain player. Hence, factors such as information visibility and relationship with the supplier are imperative for retailers, while factors such as training of human resources and chain complexity are imperative to pullet rearers. Additionally, the factor that is imperative for egg producers is quality and safety performance requirements. The fragility scores per factor were combined into a fragility composite index of each chain player. Subsequently, the composite index of fragility per chain players was combined into a final composite index that represents the fragility of each of the two configurations. The comparative fragility analysis of the configurations was performed using unequal variance ttest to determine the significant difference of the fragility means of the strategies. The performed t-test resulted in the rejection of the null hypothesis that statistically, there is no significant difference in the chains’ fragility means of the two configurations. Precisely, the difference between the chains’ strategies is associated with a variety of differences at the factor and chain player level that led up to 21% greater overall chain fragility of the chain with higher levels of interdependency. The results concur with literature that considers lean and highly integrated strategies result in interdependencies due to increased coordination. Which in return act as catalysts or causes of agri-food chains fragility because they expose them to uncertainties that are disruptive and detrimental. The affirmation of the results of the analysis with the literature put down the central point of this dissertation that there is a trade-off between the chain performance and fragility. The practical implication of the trade-off is that strategies of increased vertical coordination improve chain performance by reduction of transaction costs and risks within agri-food chains. However, the strategies multiply the fragility of the chains, under uncertainty. Hence, the important strategic choice for chain players of the South African egg industry and their value chains, is to attain a suitable coordination strategy that balances chain performance and fragility. This study concluded that the increased vertical coordination strategies improve chain performance under certain environment. But as uncertainty increases the strategies become fragile and contribute to the closure of businesses. Therefore, the following recommendations are made for the stockholders in the South African egg industry; First, a chain structure and its coordination strategies be decentralised in an organisation’s value chain management. Second, developing a “layered organisational” structure, which allows for containment of adverse impacts within the system and facilitates learning within and across different layers to drive survivorship. Third, planning for spare capacity. Last, considering which value chain strategy an organisation should pursue to improve chain performance and contain fragility.

Suggested Citation

  • Setene, Letlama, 2020. "Coordination strategies in the South African egg value chain: A review of chain performance and fragility," Research Theses 334761, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cmpart:334761
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.334761
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/334761/files/Final%20Letlama%20MSc%20Dissertation.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.334761?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wagner, Stephan M. & Neshat, Nikrouz, 2010. "Assessing the vulnerability of supply chains using graph theory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(1), pages 121-129, July.
    2. Oliver E. Williamson, 2009. "Transaction Cost Economics: The Precursors," Chapters, in: Claude Ménard & Michel Ghertman (ed.), Regulation, Deregulation, Reregulation, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Williamson, Oliver E, 1979. "Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractural Relations," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 22(2), pages 233-261, October.
    4. Williamson, Oliver E., 1987. "Transaction cost economics : The comparative contracting perspective," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 617-625, December.
    5. Steven Tadelis & Oliver E.Williamson, 2012. "Transaction Cost Economics [The Handbook of Organizational Economics]," Introductory Chapters,, Princeton University Press.
    6. Vermeulen, Hester & Kirsten, Johann F. & Sartorius, Kurt, 2008. "Contracting arrangements in agribusiness procurement practices in South Africa," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 47(2), pages 1-24, June.
    7. Vlajic, Jelena V. & van der Vorst, Jack G.A.J. & Haijema, René, 2012. "A framework for designing robust food supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 176-189.
    8. Alessandro Vespignani, 2010. "The fragility of interdependency," Nature, Nature, vol. 464(7291), pages 984-985, April.
    9. Wagner, Stephan M. & Bode, Christoph & Koziol, Philipp, 2009. "Supplier default dependencies: Empirical evidence from the automotive industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(1), pages 150-161, November.
    10. Stephan M. Wagner & Christoph Bode, 2009. "Dominant Risks and Risk Management Practices in Supply Chains," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: George A. Zsidisin & Bob Ritchie (ed.), Supply Chain Risk, chapter 17, pages 271-290, Springer.
    11. Nyamah Edmond Yeboah & Yi Feng & Oppong-Sekyere Daniel & Nyamaah Boadi Joseph, 2014. "Agricultural Supply Chain Risk Identification- A Case Finding from Ghana," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(2), pages 31-48, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Setene, Letlama & Jordaan, Daniel du P.S., 2021. "The trade-off between chain performance and fragility considering coordination strategies of agri-food chains: a South African egg chain's case study," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 24(3), March.
    2. Matolcsy, Zoltan & Wakefield, James, 2017. "Multinational headquarter control of wholly owned foreign subsidiaries," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 275-293.
    3. Soumyatanu Mukherjee & Sidhartha S. Padhi, 2022. "Sourcing decision under interconnected risks: an application of mean–variance preferences approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 313(2), pages 1243-1268, June.
    4. Averyt, William F. & Ramagopal, K., 1999. "Strategic disruption and transaction cost economics: The case of the American auto industry and Japanese competition," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 39-53, January.
    5. Luc Baumstark & Claude Ménard & William Roy & Anne Yvrande-Billon, 2005. "Modes de gestion et efficience des opérateurs dans le secteur des transports urbains de personnes," Post-Print halshs-00103116, HAL.
    6. Lydia Bals & Jon F. Kirchoff & Kai Foerstl, 2016. "Exploring the reshoring and insourcing decision making process: toward an agenda for future research," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 102-116, December.
    7. Patil, Vikram S. & Ghosh, Ranjan, 2015. "Farmer Displacement and Marginalization: A Transaction Cost Explanation from an Irrigation Project in India," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 229378, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Alejandro Agafonow, 2020. "From Hybrid Organizations to Social-purpose Hierarchies: Toward a Transaction Cost Economics of Social Enterprises," Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, , vol. 32(2), pages 180-199, July.
    9. Dahlgrün, Philipp W. & Bausch, Andreas, 2019. "How Opportunistic Culture Affects Financial Performance in Outsourcing Relationships: A Meta-Analysis," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 81-100.
    10. Jung-sik Hong & Hyeongyu Yeo & Nam-Wook Cho & Taeuk Ahn, 2018. "Identification of Core Suppliers Based on E-Invoice Data Using Supervised Machine Learning," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, October.
    11. Slapničar, Sergeja & Axelsen, Micheal & Bongiovanni, Ivano & Stockdale, David, 2023. "A pathway model to five lines of accountability in cybersecurity governance," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    12. Ranjith Appuhami & Sujatha Perera & Hector Perera, 2011. "Management Controls in Public–Private Partnerships: An Analytical Framework," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 21(1), pages 64-79, March.
    13. Huimin Liu & Yupeng Shi & Xuze Yang & Wentao Zhang, 2023. "The Role of Business Environment and Digital Government in Mitigating Supply Chain Vulnerability—Evidence from the COVID-19 Shock," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, January.
    14. Dekkers, Rob & de Boer, Ronald & Gelsomino, Luca Mattia & de Goeij, Christiaan & Steeman, Michiel & Zhou, Qijun & Sinclair, Scott & Souter, Victoria, 2020. "Evaluating theoretical conceptualisations for supply chain and finance integration: A Scottish focus group," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    15. Simshauser, P., 2020. "Merchant utilities and boundaries of the firm: vertical integration in energy-only markets," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2039, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    16. Nicole B. Baker & Christian Haddad, 2024. "Private ownership and management control decisions in infrastructure from the perspective of Transaction Cost Theory: Evidence from emerging economies," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 764-791, July.
    17. Luigi Cantone & Pierpaolo Testa & Svend Hollensen & Giuseppe Fabio Cantone, 2019. "Outsourcing New Product Development Fostered By Disruptive Technological Innovation: A Decision-Making Model," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(01), pages 1-45, January.
    18. Marta Gancarczyk, 2015. "Proces wzrostu przedsiębiorstwa w świetle podejścia zasobowego i teorii kosztów transakcyjnych," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 5, pages 5-31.
    19. Choi, Jongmoo Jay & Ju, Ming & Trigeorgis, Lenos & Zhang, Xiaotian Tina, 2021. "Outsourcing flexibility under financial constraints," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    20. Ji, Chen & de Felipe, Isabel & Briz, Julian & Trienekens, Jacques H., 2012. "An Empirical Study on Governance Structure Choices in China´s Pork Supply Chain," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(2), pages 1-32, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cmpart:334761. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.agriculturaleconomics.net .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.