IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea86/278453.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

OPTIMAL U.S. TRADE FOR AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS UNDER CHANGING COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE Marketing Costs, Structures and Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Johnson, Marc A.
  • Kiser, Harvey L.

Abstract

Domestic freight transportation at the present time enhances the competitive position of U.S. agricultural commodities on world markets. Regulatory reform has made pricing of railroad transport more competitive. Excess capacity in moving equipment and facilities, and innovations in operating patterns have resulted in timely/high-quality transport services at relatively low prices. Ocean-going bulk transport, similarly enhances the competitive position of U.S. agricultural commodities in world markets. Even in periods of high export volumes, the world ocean grain freight market has been behaviorally competitive. A high world bulk shipping price flexibility and a small route price flexibility for grain shipping indicate the free movement of bulk shipping capacity between commodities and between routes in search of opportunity. However, cargo preference rules place U.S. shipments at a significant delivered cost disadvantage for affected cargoes. Expansion of cargo preference will inhibit the competitiveness of U.S. grains and cotton in world markets. U.S. grain standards and inspection procedures and practices facilitate orderly of grain in the world market. In today's market, which is a buyers market, the issue of the quality of U.S. grain has captivated the interest of farmers, their organizations, and politicians in ririition to those usually interested who are in the handling and merchandising of grain beyond the farm gate. Grain quality in the world market is important and plays a role in the foreign buyer's choosing among several supplying countries, given that all other economic factors are equal. However, the foreign buyer's decision is most often based on price, availability of foreign exchange, credit policy, the reliabilities of supply and promptness of execution of his contract. To increase U.S. grain exports, quality concerns of foreign buyers need to be considered. But there needs to be an understanding between legitimate complaints and negotiating-type complaints of foreign grain-buyers. Quality of U.S. grain for the world market has its origin and continuity in every step of cur system -- rrciiL the plant breeder, farmer, handler, processor, exporter to the importer. Regardless of changes that are being made in U.S. grain standards, and possibly those in the future, how will the marketing system respond? What will be the costs to the participants in the production and marketing system? Will the benefits outweigh the costs? What incentives are there to improve the quality of grain delivered to and handled in marketing system? Will changes in grain standards enhance the determination of the value of a lot of grain? Will disincentives for delivery in better grain above the basic buying grade continue? How can we encourage improved grain quality and still meet the purposes of standards in efficiently marketing U.S. grain in the world market?

Suggested Citation

  • Johnson, Marc A. & Kiser, Harvey L., 1986. "OPTIMAL U.S. TRADE FOR AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS UNDER CHANGING COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE Marketing Costs, Structures and Practices," 1986 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Reno, Nevada 278453, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea86:278453
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.278453
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/278453/files/aaea-1986-156.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.278453?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johnson, Marc A., 1981. "Impacts On Agriculture Of Deregulating The Transportation System," 1981 Annual Meeting, July 26-29, Clemson, South Carolina 279412, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Glaser, Lewrene K., 1986. "Provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309344, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Marc A. Johnson, 1981. "Impacts on Agriculture of Deregulating the Transportation System," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 63(5), pages 913-920.
    4. L. Orlo Sorenson, 1984. "Some Impacts of Rail Regulatory Changes on Grain Industries," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 66(5), pages 645-650.
    5. Sorenson, L. Orlo, 1984. "Some Impacts of Rail Regulatory Changes on Grain Industries," 1984 Annual Meeting, August 5-8, Ithaca, New York 279102, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. James K. Binkley & Bruce Harrer, 1981. "Major Determinants of Ocean Freight Rates for Grains: An Econometric Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 63(1), pages 47-57.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James B. Bushnell & Jonathan E. Hughes & Aaron Smith, 2017. "Food vs. Fuel? Impacts of Petroleum Shipments on Agricultural Prices," NBER Working Papers 23924, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Archibald, Sandra O. & McCalla, Alex F. & McCorkle Jr., Chester O., 1985. "Trends In The U.S. Food Processing Industry: Implications For Modelling And Policy Analysis In A Dynamic Interactive Environment," 1985 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Ames, Iowa 278667, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Spriggs, John & Geldard, Jane & Gerardi, Walter & Treadwell, Rhonda, 1987. "Institutional arrangements in the wheat distribution system," Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES) Archive 316180, Australian Government, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences.
    4. Fuller, Stephen & Bessler, David & MacDonald, James & Wohlgenant, Michael, 1987. "Effect of Deregulation in Export-Grain Rail Rates in the Plains and Corn Belt," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 28(1).
    5. Joon Je Park & Michael W. Babcock & Kenneth Lemke & Dennis L. Weisman, 2001. "Simulating the Effects of Railroad Mergers," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(4), pages 938-953, April.
    6. Poole, Jeffrey C., 1985. "The Impact of Trucking Deregulation on the Transportation of Michigan Agricultural Products," Agricultural Economic Report Series 201344, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    7. Wilson, Wesley W. & Wilson, William W., 2001. "Deregulation, rate incentives, and efficiency in the railroad market," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 1-24, January.
    8. repec:ags:aaea22:335435 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Liu, Yun & Zhang, Yun & Zhang, Yifei & Xiao, He, 2022. "Small business owners’ Fintech credit in crises: Theory and evidence from farmers under the COVID-19," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    10. Hoffman, Linwood A. & Livezey, Janet, 1987. "The U.S. Oats Industry," Agricultural Economic Reports 305462, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    11. Stephen W. Fuller & Luis Fellin & Ken Eriksen, 2000. "Panama canal: How critical to U.S. grain exports?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(4), pages 435-455.
    12. Daniel H. Pick & Timothy A. Park, 1991. "The Competitive Structure of U.S. Agricultural Exports," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 73(1), pages 133-141.
    13. Zulauf, Carl & Langemeier, Michael & Schnitkey, Gary, 2022. "U.S. Crop Profitability and Farm Safety Net Payments Since 1975," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 2022.
    14. Green, Robert C., 1988. "Wheat Price And Income Support And Acreage Reduction Policy Instruments," 1988 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Knoxville, Tennessee 270148, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    15. Atwood, Jay Dee & Hallam, Arne, 1990. "Farm Structure And Stewardship Of The Environment," 1990 Conference, January 6-9, Albuquerque, New Mexico 260176, Regional Research Committe NC-181: Determinants of Farm Size and Structure.
    16. Jones, James R., 1995. "Maritime Shipping Issues And Us Agricultural Exports," A.E. Research Series 305142, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    17. Shapouri, Shahla, 1990. "Food Aid: Motivation and Allocation Criteria," Foreign Agricultural Economic Report (FAER) 147994, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    18. Penson, John B. & Chen, Dean T., 1988. "Design and Application of a Structural General Equilibrium Model to Farm Policy Analysis," Staff Reports 257926, Texas A&M University, Agricultural and Food Policy Center.
    19. Blayney, Don P. & Fallert, Richard, 1990. "The World Dairy Market--Government Intervention and Multilateral Policy Reform," Staff Reports 278345, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    20. Ito, Shoichi & Peterson, E. Wesley F. & Mainali, Bharat & Rosegrant, Mark W., 1999. "Estimates for Evolution of U.S. Rice Supply Response Using Implicit Revenue Functions: Implications to the World Food Supply and Trade," Japanese Journal of Agricultural Economics (formerly Japanese Journal of Rural Economics), Agricultural Economics Society of Japan (AESJ), vol. 1.
    21. Michael S. Haigh & Nikos K. Nomikos & David A. Bessler, 2004. "Integration and Causality in International Freight Markets: Modeling with Error Correction and Directed Acyclic Graphs," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 71(1), pages 145-162, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea86:278453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.aaea.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.