IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerssr/278064.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Agriculture In The Uruguay Round: Analyses Of Government Support

Author

Listed:
  • Agriculture and Trade Analysis Division

Abstract

Current negotiations under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade are considering proposals to eliminate government programs affecting agriculture in the member countries. Key to the negotiations are measures to assess the economic effect of such programs on trade. The producer and consumer subsidy equivalents (PSEs and CSEs) are such measures. Subsidy equivalents, by summarizing the effects of a wide variety of government policies into one parameter, allow comparisons to be made of government support across countries, commodity markets, and types of policies. This report presents several analyses of government intervention in agriculture as measured by PSEs and CSEs.

Suggested Citation

  • Agriculture and Trade Analysis Division, 1988. "Agriculture In The Uruguay Round: Analyses Of Government Support," Staff Reports 278064, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278064
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.278064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/278064/files/ers-report-367.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.278064?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rausser, Gordon C. & Wright, Brian D, 1987. "Alternative strategies for trade policy reform," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt2vr4399k, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    2. Ballenger, Nicole, 1988. "PSEs: What They Are And Their Role In Trade Negotiations," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 3(1), pages 1-2.
    3. Lin, Ching-yuan, 1988. "East Asia and Latin America as Contrasting Models," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36(3), pages 153-197, Supplemen.
    4. Tang, Anthony M, 1988. "Why Does Overcrowded, Resource-Poor East Asia Succeed--Lessons for the LDCs? Introduction," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36(3), pages 5-10, Supplemen.
    5. Kuznets, Paul W, 1988. "An East Asian Model of Economic Development: Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36(3), pages 11-43, Supplemen.
    6. Glaser, Lewrene K., 1986. "Provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309344, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Josling, Tim & Tangermann, Stefan, 1988. "Measuring Levels of Protection in Agriculture: A Survey of Approaches and Results," 1988 Conference, August 24-31, 1988, Buenos Aires, Argentina 183129, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Bela Balassa, 1965. "Tariff Protection in Industrial Countries: An Evaluation," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 73(6), pages 573-573.
    9. Teitel, Simon & Thoumi, Francisco E, 1986. "From Import Substitution to Exports: The Manufacturing Exports Experience of Argentina and Brazil," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 34(3), pages 455-490, April.
    10. Tangermann, Stefan & Josling, Timothy E. & Pearson, Scott R., 1987. "International Negotiations on Farm Support Levels: The Role of PSEs," Working Papers 51239, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    11. W. M. Corden, 1966. "The Structure of a Tariff System and the Effective Protective Rate," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 74(3), pages 221-221.
    12. Roningen, Vernon & Sullivan, John & Wainio, John, 1987. "The Impact of the Removal of Support to Agriculture in Developed Countries," 1987 Annual Meeting, August 2-5, East Lansing, Michigan 269904, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    13. Mancur Olson, 1984. "Australia in the Perspective of the Rise and Decline of Nations," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 17(3), pages 7-17, November.
    14. Gardner, Bruce L, 1987. "Causes of U.S. Farm Commodity Programs," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 95(2), pages 290-310, April.
    15. Lee, Chung H & Naya, Seiji, 1988. "Trade in East Asian Development with Comparative Reference to Southeast Asian Experiences," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36(3), pages 123-152, Supplemen.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robinson, Sherman & Kilkenny, Maureen & Adelman, Irma, 1988. "The Effect of Trade Liberalization in Agriculture on the U.S. Economy to 1991," CUDARE Working Papers 198475, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    2. Skully, David W., 1990. "Government Intervention in Agriculture: A Regulatory Approach," Staff Reports 278332, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Geoff Edwards, 1987. "U.S. farm policy: an Australian perspective," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue Oct.
    4. T. Paul Schultz, 2006. "Does the Liberalization of Trade Advance Gender Equality in Schooling and Health?," Working Papers 935, Economic Growth Center, Yale University.
    5. Fuess, Scott Jr. & Van den Berg, Hendrik, 1996. "Transactional activities and total factor productivity growth in Taiwan," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 635-650.
    6. Zhaohui Niu & Chang Liu & Saileshsingh Gunessee & Chris Milner, 2018. "Non-tariff and overall protection: evidence across countries and over time," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 154(4), pages 675-703, November.
    7. Luke Willard, 2000. "Does Openness Promote Growth?," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 7(3), pages 251-261.
    8. Lindland, Jostein, 1997. "The impact of the Uruguay Round on tariff escalation in agricultural products," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(6), pages 487-500, December.
    9. Antoine Bouët, 2000. "La mesure des protections commerciales nationales," Working Papers 2000-15, CEPII research center.
    10. Ishikawa, Jota & Lee, Ki-Dong, 1997. "Backfiring tariffs in vertically related markets," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3-4), pages 395-423, May.
    11. Garred, Jason, 2018. "The persistence of trade policy in China after WTO accession," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 130-142.
    12. Bo Chen & Hong Ma & David S. Jacks, 2017. "Revisiting the Effective Rate of Protection in the Late Stages of Chinese Industrialisation," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 424-438, February.
    13. Rouzet, Dorothée & Miroudot, Sébastien, 2013. "The Cumulative Impact of Trade Barriers along the Value Chain: An Empirical Assessment using the OECD Inter-Country Input-Output Model," Conference papers 332366, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    14. J Fedderke & P Vaze, 2001. "THE NATURE OF SOUTH AFRICA'S TRADE PATTERNS BY ECONOMIC SECTOR, AND THE EXTENT OF TRADE LIBERALIZATION DURING THE COURSE OF THE 1990′s," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 69(3), pages 436-478, September.
    15. Kanika Pathania & Aditya Bhattacharjea, 2020. "Inverted Duty Structures and the Paradox of Negative Effective Protection in India, 2000–2014," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 55(2), pages 139-167, May.
    16. Avinash K. Dixit & Gene M. Grossman, 1982. "Trade and Protection with Multistage Production," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 49(4), pages 583-594.
    17. Marks, Stephen V., 2011. "Lao economic policies and effective rates of protection," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 115-127, April.
    18. repec:phd:pjdevt:jpd_1987_vol__xiv_no__1-c is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Pol Antràs & Davin Chor, 2021. "Global Value Chains," NBER Working Papers 28549, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Kilkenny, Maureen, 1991. "Computable General Equilibrium Modeling of Agricultural Policies: Documentation of the 30-Sector FPGE GAMS Model of the United States," Staff Reports 278539, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    21. Escaith, Hubert, 2014. "Exploring the policy dimensions of trade in value-added," MPRA Paper 59891, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 08 Nov 2014.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278064. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.