IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea16/235871.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A study on consumer characteristics of processed rice and meat products on food-related lifestyles using beta regression model

Author

Listed:
  • Jin Hyeung, Kim
  • Sung Ho, Park
  • Young Chan, Choe

Abstract

This study compares consumer characteristics of processed rice and meat products on food-related lifestyles. As the social environment changes and household income improves, the trend of diet change and single-person households is diversifying the food consumption patterns of consumers. The food industry and production technology has developed and the consumption of processed or convenience food is increasing. The existing studies are mostly related to the riskiness and disease-causing factors of processed food. In the Asian markets such as Korea and Japan and the North American and European markets, the processed rice industry is rapidly developing. In this study, we analyze the purchasing characteristics of processed rice consumption as compared to processed meat products. We used consumer panel purchase data of 703 housewives in South Korea from the Rural Development Administration. The data includes household purchasing scanner panel data for the year 2014 and questionnaires related to food-related lifestyle. We used confirmatory factor analysis and the beta regression model to identify processed food consumer characteristics. The purchase rate of processed food over the total amount has a range from ‘0’ to ‘1’. To correct for heteroscedasticity and statistical errors in the dependent variable, we use the beta regression model for the rate from ‘0’ to ‘1’. . The social democratic variables such as age and number of family members from the beta regression have a negative relationship and the eating out purchase amount has a positive relationship with both processed rice and meat products (p <0.05). The food-related lifestyles variables of the price criteria for quality and the cost performance for ways of shopping and eating out in a consumption situation increased the rate of purchasing processed meat. However, health quality decreased the consumption rate of processed meat (p <0.05). In the case of processed rice, the propensity to seek a cooking method increased the rate of purchasing processed rice (p <0.05), and the price criteria for ways to shop and propensity to cook with a plan decreased the rate of purchasing amount (p <0.05). According to the results, consumers who purchase a high proportion of processed meat usually consider more price information and consume relatively less healthy products. However, consumers of processed rice tend to purchasing for a new cooking method and consider less a price criteria and cooking plan for consumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin Hyeung, Kim & Sung Ho, Park & Young Chan, Choe, 2016. "A study on consumer characteristics of processed rice and meat products on food-related lifestyles using beta regression model," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235871, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea16:235871
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.235871
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/235871/files/A_study_on_consumer_characteristics_of_processed_rice_and_meat_products_on_food-related_lifestyles_using_beta_regression_model_full_paper.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.235871?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jongwanich, Juthathip, 2009. "The impact of food safety standards on processed food exports from developing countries," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 447-457, October.
    2. Jensen, Helen H. & Yen, S., 1995. "Wife's Employment and Food Expenditures Away from Home," Staff General Research Papers Archive 10523, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brown, Sarah & Greene, William H. & Harris, Mark N. & Taylor, Karl, 2015. "An inverse hyperbolic sine heteroskedastic latent class panel tobit model: An application to modelling charitable donations," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 228-236.
    2. Anjani Kumar & Ashok K. Mishra & Sunil Saroj & Vinay K. Sonkar & Ganesh Thapa & Pramod K. Joshi, 2020. "Food safety measures and food security of smallholder dairy farmers: Empirical evidence from Bihar, India," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(3), pages 363-384, June.
    3. Adrián Rabadán & Ángela Triguero, 2021. "Influence of food safety standards on trade: Evidence from the pistachio sector," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(3), pages 489-514, July.
    4. Jin, Shaosheng & Guo, Haiyue & Delgado, Michael S. & Wang, H. Holly, 2017. "Benefit or damage? The productivity effects of FDI in the Chinese food industry," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 1-9.
    5. Maertens, Miet & Swinnen, Johan, 2015. "Agricultural trade and development: A value chain perspective," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2015-04, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    6. Schuster, Monica & Maertens, Miet, 2013. "Do private standards create exclusive supply chains? New evidence from the Peruvian asparagus export sector," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 291-305.
    7. Fabio Gaetano Santeramo & Emilia Lamonaca, 2019. "The Effects of Non‐tariff Measures on Agri‐food Trade: A Review and Meta‐analysis of Empirical Evidence," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(3), pages 595-617, September.
    8. Briones, Roehlano & Felipe, Jesus, 2013. "Agriculture and Structural Transformation in Developing Asia: Review and Outlook," ADB Economics Working Paper Series 363, Asian Development Bank.
    9. Akin-Olagunju, O. & Yusuf, S. & Okoruwa, V., 2018. "Harmonization of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Standards in Cocoa Trade: How Competitive are the Major Exporting Countries?," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277463, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Engler, Alejandra & Nahuelhual, Laura & Cofré, Gabriela & Barrena, Jose, 2012. "How far from harmonization are sanitary, phytosanitary and quality-related standards? An exporter’s perception approach," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 162-170.
    11. Fabio Gaetano Santeramo & Emilia Lamonaca, 2022. "On the trade effects of bilateral SPS measures in developed and developing countries," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(10), pages 3109-3145, October.
    12. Salo Coslovsky, 2013. "Enforcing Food Quality and Safety Standards in Brazil," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 649(1), pages 122-138, September.
    13. Alessandra De Chiara, 2020. "Sustainable Business Model Innovation vs. “Made in” for International Performance of Italian Food Companies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Roehlano M. Briones, 2013. "The Structure of Agricultural Trade Industry in Developing Countries," Trade Working Papers 23420, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    15. Frederik Stender & Axel Berger & Clara Brandi & Jakob Schwab, 2021. "The Trade Effects of the Economic Partnership Agreements between the European Union and the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States: Early Empirical Insights from Panel Data," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(6), pages 1495-1515, November.
    16. Mohammed, Rezgar & Zheng, Yuqing, 2017. "International Diffusion Of Food Safety Standards: The Role Of Domestic Certifiers And International Trade," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(2), pages 296-322, May.
    17. Fabio Gaetano Santeramo & Valentina Guerrieri & Emilia Lamonaca, 2018. "On the Evolution of Trade and Sanitary and Phytosanitary Standards: The Role of Trade Agreements," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, December.
    18. A. Amarender Reddy & Sandra Ricart & Timothy Cadman, 2020. "Driving factors of food safety standards in India: learning from street-food vendors’ behaviour and attitude," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(6), pages 1201-1217, December.
    19. Chen, You-hua & Huang, Sun-jun & Mishra, Ashok K. & Wang, X. Henry, 2018. "Effects of input capacity constraints on food quality and regulation mechanism design for food safety management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 385(C), pages 89-95.
    20. Juthathip Jongwanich & Nedelyn Magtibay-Ramos, 2009. "Determinants of structural change in food exports from developing countries," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 23(2), pages 94-115, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Demand and Price Analysis; Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety; Marketing;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea16:235871. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.