IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea13/150975.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Considering Stakeholders when Implementing New Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Larson, Ronald B.
  • Brown, Anna K.

Abstract

Integrating the concerns of stakeholders into the decision process can be particularly important when adopting a new technology. Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) offers many potential benefits to the healthcare industry. However, hospital administrators who are examining this technology may not be considering the concerns of some secondary stakeholders (e.g, patients). A consumer survey found that support for two RFID applications in hospitals varied both across respondents and across applications. Privacy attitudes and behaviors were linked with RFID support levels. Increased two-way communications between healthcare management and both primary and secondary stakeholders may help improve the technology adoption decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Larson, Ronald B. & Brown, Anna K., 2013. "Considering Stakeholders when Implementing New Technologies," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150975, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea13:150975
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.150975
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/150975/files/MedicalRFID%20_1_.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.150975?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Larson, Ronald B. & Rana, Kulmani, 2011. "Consumer Support for Food Tracing with RFID Technology," 2011 Annual Meeting, July 24-26, 2011, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 103672, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Amelia S. Carr & Man Zhang & Inge Klopping & Hokey Min, 2010. "RFID Technology: Implications for Healthcare Organizations," American Journal of Business, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(2), pages 25-40, October.
    3. Scott Vitell, 2009. "The Role of Religiosity in Business and Consumer Ethics: A Review of the Literature," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(2), pages 155-167, November.
    4. Tzeng, Shiou-Fen & Chen, Wun-Hwa & Pai, Fan-Yun, 2008. "Evaluating the business value of RFID: Evidence from five case studies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 601-613, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fosso Wamba, Samuel & Anand, Abhijith & Carter, Lemuria, 2013. "A literature review of RFID-enabled healthcare applications and issues," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 875-891.
    2. Yazici, Hulya Julie, 2014. "An exploratory analysis of hospital perspectives on real time information requirements and perceived benefits of RFID technology for future adoption," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 603-621.
    3. Daniela Andreini & Diego Rinallo & Giuseppe Pedeliento & Mara Bergamaschi, 2017. "Brands and Religion in the Secularized Marketplace and Workplace: Insights from the Case of an Italian Hospital Renamed After a Roman Catholic Pope," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 529-550, March.
    4. Ayodeji Emmanuel Oke & Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Mohamed Elseknidy & Fakunle Samuel Kayode, 2023. "Radio frequency identification implementation model for sustainable development: A structural equation modeling approach," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1824-1844, June.
    5. R. Casselman & Linda Sama & Abraham Stefanidis, 2015. "Differential Social Performance of Religiously-Affiliated Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) in Base of Pyramid (BoP) Markets," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(3), pages 539-552, December.
    6. Chan, Christopher & Ananthram, Subramaniam & Thaker, Keyur & Liu, Yi, 2022. "Do religiosity and ethical principles influence ethical decision-making in a multi-faith context? Evidence from India," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 772-785.
    7. Yu Chen & Xiaoyan Chu & Jung Chul Park & Jared S. Soileau, 2022. "CEO religious university affiliation and financial reporting quality," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(1), pages 417-468, March.
    8. Mehmet Asutay & Primandanu Febriyan Aziz & Banjaran S. Indrastomo & Yusuf Karbhari, 2023. "Religiosity and Charitable Giving on Investors’ Trading Behaviour in the Indonesian Islamic Stock Market: Islamic vs Market Logic," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(2), pages 327-348, November.
    9. Rami Salem & Ernest Ezeani & Xi Song, 2023. "The relationship between religiosity and voluntary disclosure quality: a cross-country evidence from the banking sector," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 983-1023, April.
    10. Lee, In & Lee, Byoung-Chan, 2010. "An investment evaluation of supply chain RFID technologies: A normative modeling approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 313-323, June.
    11. Rafi M. M. I. Chowdhury, 2018. "Religiosity and Voluntary Simplicity: The Mediating Role of Spiritual Well-Being," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 149-174, September.
    12. Ferdinand A. Gul & Anthony C. Ng, 2018. "Auditee Religiosity, External Monitoring, and the Pricing of Audit Services," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(2), pages 409-436, October.
    13. Samer Sarofim & Elizabeth Minton & Amabel Hunting & Darrell E. Bartholomew & Saman Zehra & William Montford & Frank Cabano & Pallab Paul, 2020. "Religion's influence on the financial well‐being of consumers: A conceptual framework and research agenda," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 1028-1061, September.
    14. Rizaldi Yusfiarto & Septy Setia Nugraha & Galuh Tri Pambekti & Annes Nisrina Khoirunnisa, 2023. "Building loyalty in Islamic banking relationship: a multiple mediation approach empirically in Indonesia," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(2), pages 306-320, June.
    15. Ervin L. Black & F. Greg Burton & Joshua K. Cieslewicz, 2022. "Improving Ethics: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior to Include Moral Disengagement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(4), pages 945-978, December.
    16. Khaled O. Alotaibi & Christine Helliar & Nongnuch Tantisantiwong, 2022. "Competing Logics in the Islamic Funds Industry: A Market Logic Versus a Religious Logic," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 207-230, January.
    17. De Marco, Alberto & Cagliano, Anna C. & Nervo, Mauro L. & Rafele, Carlo, 2012. "Using System Dynamics to assess the impact of RFID technology on retail operations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 333-344.
    18. Jackaria Nazneen Carrim, 2017. "Religious Influences on Store Loyalty Among Grocery Shoppers In Mauritius: The Mediating Role of Trust," GATR Journals gjbssr496, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    19. Geng Niu & Yang Zhou & Weijie Lu & Hongwu Gan, 2022. "Religiosity and corruption in bank lending," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(9-10), pages 1957-1983, October.
    20. Anabel Orellano & Carmen Valor & Emilio Chuvieco, 2020. "The Influence of Religion on Sustainable Consumption: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-21, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Institutional and Behavioral Economics; Research and Development/Tech Change/Emerging Technologies;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea13:150975. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.