IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea01/20755.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Wheat Differentiation And Response To Policy Reform In The Eu

Author

Listed:
  • Frahan, Bruno Henry de
  • Tritten, Christian
  • Sumner, Daniel A.

Abstract

Agenda 2000 reduces the bias in favor of low quality wheat in European Union (EU) production, but also improves access for imports of high quality wheat. Therefore, this paper uses a partial equilibrium displacement model that differentiates wheat according to its origin and end use to investigate the impact of Agenda 2000 on wheat supply and demand in France.

Suggested Citation

  • Frahan, Bruno Henry de & Tritten, Christian & Sumner, Daniel A., 2001. "Wheat Differentiation And Response To Policy Reform In The Eu," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20755, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea01:20755
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.20755
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/20755/files/sp01he07.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.20755?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohanty, Samarendu & Peterson, E. Wesley F., 1999. "Estimation of Demand for Wheat by Classes for the United States and the European Union," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(2), pages 158-168, October.
    2. Giancarlo Moschini & Daniele Moro & Richard D. Green, 1994. "Maintaining and Testing Separability in Demand Systems," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 76(1), pages 61-73.
    3. George C. Davis & M. Cristina Espinoza, 2000. "A Unified Approach to Sensitivity Analysis in Equilibrium Displacement Models: Reply," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 82(1), pages 241-243.
    4. Julian M. Alston & Richard Gray & Daniel A. Sumner, 1994. "The Wheat War of 1994," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 42(3), pages 231-251, November.
    5. Harry de Gorter & Karl D. Meilke, 1987. "The EEC's Wheat Price Policies and International Trade in Differentiated Products," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(2), pages 223-229.
    6. George C. Davis & Maria Cristina Espinoza, 1998. "A Unified Approach to Sensitivity Analysis in Equilibrium Displacement Models," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 80(4), pages 868-879.
    7. Colman, David, 1985. "Imperfect Transmission of Policy Prices," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 12(3), pages 171-186.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frahan, Bruno Henry de & Tritten, Christian, 2002. "Differentiated Demand and Supply of Wheat under Alternative European Trade Policies," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24831, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Lei, Lei, 2018. "Effects of trade policy on technological innovation in agricultural markets - implications for the developing economies," IDE Discussion Papers 687, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    3. Davis, George C., 2001. "Confirmation And Falsification Of Equilibrium Displacement Models," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20525, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Eric Tollens, 2004. "Biodiversity versus transgenic sugar beet: the one euro question," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 31(1), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Rickard, Bradley J. & Lei, Lei, 2010. "How important are sanitary and phytosanitary barriers in international markets for fresh fruit?," Working Papers 126974, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    6. Sambucci, Olena & Sumner, Daniel A. & Goldstein, Robin, 2020. "Effect of taxes and costly regulations on the licensed and unlicensed cannabis markets," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304602, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Ferrier, Peyton M. & Zhen, Chen & Bovay, John, 2023. "Price and Welfare Effects of the Food Safety Modernization Act Produce Safety Rule," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 48(1), January.
    8. repec:ags:aare02:125165 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Thomas L. Marsh, 2005. "Economic substitution for US wheat food use by class," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 49(3), pages 283-301, September.
    10. Demont, Matty & Tollens, Eric, 2001. "Uncertainties Of Estimating The Welfare Effects Of Agricultural Biotechnology In The European Union," Working Papers 31828, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centre for Agricultural and Food Economics.
    11. Njonou, Rabelais Yankam & Frahan, Bruno Henry de & Surry, Yves R., 2002. "Testing Separability for Common Wheat Qualities in French Import Demand Market Using Aids and Rotterdam Demand Models," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24921, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Bullock, David S. & Salhofer, Klaus, 2003. "Judging agricultural policies: a survey," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 225-243, May.
    13. Hassan, Daniel & Monier-Dilhan, Sylvette, 2009. "Mesure des changements de consommation suite à une segmentation de l’offre : l’exemple de la tomate fraîche," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 90(3).
    14. Sven Anders & Harsche, Johannes & Roland Herrmann & Klaus Salhofer, 2004. "Regional income effects of producer support under the CAP," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 73, pages 103-121.
    15. Unknown, 2006. "Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Volume 2, Number 2, Fall 2006," Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 2(2).
    16. Ufer, Danielle & Countryman, Amanda M. & Muhammad, Andrew, 2020. "How important are product attributes for U.S. lamb imports?," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 23(3), August.
    17. Karel Janda & Jill J. McCluskey & Gordon C. Rausser, 2000. "Food Import Demand in the Czech Republic," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1), pages 22-44, January.
    18. Surry, Yves, 1988. "Cereal Prices In The European Community: A Policy Transmission Model," 1988 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Knoxville, Tennessee 270322, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. Hahn, William F., 2001. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation Of A Random Coefficient Meat Demand System," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20573, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    20. Ryo Sakamoto & Kyle Stiegert, 2018. "Comparing competitive toughness to benchmark outcomes in retail oligopoly pricing," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 44-60, December.
    21. Dhar, Tirtha & Chavas, Jean- Paul & Cotterill, Ronald W. & Gould, Brian W., 2005. "An Economic Analysis of Brand-Level Strategic Pricing Between Coca-Cola Company and Pepsi," Working Papers 201538, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Food System Research Group.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea01:20755. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.