IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/zbw/ofel19/196075.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Public-Private Partnerships in Post-Socialist Urban Governance: Comparative Institutional Change in Leipzig, Shanghai and Ho Chi Minh City

In: 7th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship: Embracing Diversity in Organisations. April 5th - 6th, 2019, Dubrovnik, Croatia

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen Minh Doi

Abstract

Thirty years after Soviet-style socialism, the post-socialist cities have witnessed a wideranging transformation in urban processes toward various forms of the trend "government to governance". This paper aims to explore the differences in Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) institutional change in Leipzig, Shanghai, and Ho Chi Minh City and eventually to describe and profile such differences. Firstly, analysing the stages of development of PPPs, and the methods of urban governance can indicate some differences in the formal and informal institutional changes of three cities. Secondly, using the integrated framework, developed by DiGaetano and Strom (2003), which emphasizes that the joining together of structural, cultural, and rational actor approaches to a cross-case studies comparison, in order to explain the differences in the path of institutional change for PPPs formed by varied forms and degrees regarding the withdrawal of state control affected by globalization, marketization, as well as culture, history, and rational actors. Lastly, this paper critically discusses the institutional challenges for PPPs of these post-socialist cities within collaborative governance and drawing up recommendations for future policy measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen Minh Doi, 2019. "Public-Private Partnerships in Post-Socialist Urban Governance: Comparative Institutional Change in Leipzig, Shanghai and Ho Chi Minh City," 7th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship: Embracing Diversity in Organisations (Dubrovnik, 2019), in: 7th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship: Embracing Diversity in Organisations. April 5th - 6th, 2019, Dubrovn, pages 110-127, Governance Research and Development Centre (CIRU), Zagreb.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ofel19:196075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/196075/1/ofel-2019-p110-127.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zorica Nedović-Budić & Sasha Tsenkova & Peter Marcuse, 2006. "The urban mosaic of post-socialist Europe," Contributions to Economics, in: Sasha Tsenkova & Zorica Nedović-Budić (ed.), The Urban Mosaic of Post-Socialist Europe, chapter 1, pages 3-20, Springer.
    2. Uta Hohn & Birgit Neuer, 2006. "New urban governance: Institutional change and consequences for urban development," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 291-298, April.
    3. Kingston, Christopher & Caballero, Gonzalo, 2009. "Comparing theories of institutional change," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(2), pages 151-180, August.
    4. Hans Van Ham & Joop Koppenjan, 2001. "BUILDING PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS: Assessing and managing risks in port development," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(4), pages 593-616, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Franz & Orhan Güles & Gisela Prey, 2008. "Place‐Making And ‘Green’ Reuses Of Brownfields In The Ruhr," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 99(3), pages 316-328, July.
    2. Caballero-Miguez, Gonzalo & Fernández-González, Raquel, 2015. "Institutional analysis, allocation of liabilities and third-party enforcement via courts: The case of the Prestige oil spill," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 90-101.
    3. Maria Budnik & Katrin Grossmann & Christoph Hedtke, 2021. "Migration-Related Conflicts as Drivers of Institutional Change?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 103-112.
    4. Efrat Eizenberg & Mor Shilon, 2016. "Pedagogy for the new planner: Refining the qualitative toolbox," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(6), pages 1118-1135, November.
    5. Szymon Marcińczak & Iwona Sagan, 2011. "The Socio-spatial Restructuring of Šódź, Poland," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(9), pages 1789-1809, July.
    6. Ratka ÄŒolić & Ä orÄ‘e Milić & Jasna Petrić & NataÅ¡a ÄŒolić, 2022. "Institutional capacity development within the national urban policy formation process – Participants’ views," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(1), pages 69-89, February.
    7. Dorota Mantey, 2021. "Objective and Subjective Determinants of Neighborhood Satisfaction in the Context of Retrofitting Suburbs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Venkateswaran, Viswanathan & S Kumar, Deepak & Gupta, Deepak, 2021. "‘To Trust or Not’: Impact of camouflage strategies on trust in the sharing economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 110-126.
    9. Luca Grilli & Boris Mrkajic & Gresa Latifi, 2018. "Venture capital in Europe: social capital, formal institutions and mediation effects," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 393-410, August.
    10. Gornik, Markus, 2020. "Smart governance: Kashiwa-no-ha smart city in Japan as a model for future urban development?," Wuppertaler Studienarbeiten zur nachhaltigen Entwicklung, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, volume 22, number 22.
    11. Sonin, Konstantin & Acemoglu, Daron & Egorov, Georgy, 2020. "Institutional Change and Institutional Persistence," CEPR Discussion Papers 15295, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    12. Perić Ana, 2016. "Institutional Cooperation in the Brownfield Regeneration Process: Experiences from Central and Eastern European Countries," European Spatial Research and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 23(1), pages 21-46, June.
    13. Rachael Nsasira & Benon C. Basheka & Pross. N. Oluka, 2013. "Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) and Enhanced Service Delivery in Uganda: Implications from the Energy Sector," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(3), pages 48-60, May.
    14. Dmitri Vinogradov & Elena Shadrina, 2018. "Public-Private Partnerships as Collaborative Projects: Testing the Theory on Cases from EU and Russia," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(5-6), pages 446-459, April.
    15. Fischer, Beate & Klauer, Bernd & Schiller, Johannes, 2013. "Prospects for sustainable land-use policy in Germany: Experimenting with a sustainability heuristic," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 213-220.
    16. Jana Temelová & Jakub Novák & Martin Ou rednícek & Petra Puldová, 2011. "Housing Estates in the Czech Republic after Socialism: Various Trajectories and Inner Differentiation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(9), pages 1811-1834, July.
    17. Jakub Sukiennik & Sławomir Czetwertyński & Marcin Brol, 2022. "Selected Models of Institutional Change in Theory and Practice," Ekonomista, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, issue 2, pages 190-212.
    18. Mohamad Ghassan Hajj & Manale Khalil, 2024. "Decoupled Relationship Between CSR Bank Disclosures and SME Financing: A Case Study of Alpha Banks in Lebanon," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 118-130.
    19. Heike Hanhörster & Isabel Ramos Lobato, 2021. "Migrants’ Access to the Rental Housing Market in Germany: Housing Providers and Allocation Policies," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 7-18.
    20. Katona, Márton & Petrovics, Nándor, 2021. "Válság és együttműködés. A koronavírus-járvány okozta lehetséges intézményi változások és a kooperatív közszolgáltatások [Crisis and cooperation: possible institutional changes caused by the corona," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 76-95.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ofel19:196075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ciru.hr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.