IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v48y2011i9p1811-1834.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Housing Estates in the Czech Republic after Socialism: Various Trajectories and Inner Differentiation

Author

Listed:
  • Jana Temelová

    (Department of Social Geography and Regional Development, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Albertov 6, Prague 2, 128 43, Czech Republic)

  • Jakub Novák

    (Department of Social Geography and Regional Development, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Albertov 6, Prague 2, 128 43, Czech Republic)

  • Martin Ou rednícek

    (Department of Social Geography and Regional Development, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Albertov 6, Prague 2, 128 43, Czech Republic)

  • Petra Puldová

    (Department of Social Geography and Regional Development, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Albertov 6, Prague 2, 128 43, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Growing income differentiation in society, diversification of housing supply and selective population mobility are resulting in increasing socio-spatial differentiation in Czech cities and neighbourhoods during the post-socialist transition. Housing estates are no exception to the processes of urban change. The paper shows that development trajectories of housing estates vary in different parts of the country, in various locations within each city and also within particular housing estates. As segregation in Czech cities takes place mainly within very small areas, statistical analyses usually fail to detect the seeds of social and physical degradation emerging in neighbourhoods and a micro survey is essential. In order to understand the patterns and factors of differentiation, the paper presents case studies from housing estates located in different cities of the Czech Republic.

Suggested Citation

  • Jana Temelová & Jakub Novák & Martin Ou rednícek & Petra Puldová, 2011. "Housing Estates in the Czech Republic after Socialism: Various Trajectories and Inner Differentiation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(9), pages 1811-1834, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:48:y:2011:i:9:p:1811-1834
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098010379279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://usj.sagepub.com/content/48/9/1811.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098010379279?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zorica Nedović-Budić & Sasha Tsenkova & Peter Marcuse, 2006. "The urban mosaic of post-socialist Europe," Contributions to Economics, in: Sasha Tsenkova & Zorica Nedović-Budić (ed.), The Urban Mosaic of Post-Socialist Europe, chapter 1, pages 3-20, Springer.
    2. Karien Dekker & Ronald Van Kempen, 2004. "Large Housing Estates In Europe: Current Situation And Developments," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 95(5), pages 570-577, December.
    3. Birgit Glock & Hartmut Häussermann, 2004. "New trends in urban development and public policy in eastern Germany: dealing with the vacant housing problem at the local level," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 919-929, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. KubešCDFMR Jan, 2013. "European post-socialist cities and their near hinterland in intra-urban geography literature," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 19(19), pages 19-43, June.
    2. Nihad El-Kayed & Matthias Bernt & Ulrike Hamann & Madlen Pilz, 2020. "Peripheral Estates as Arrival Spaces? Conceptualising Research on Arrival Functions of New Immigrant Destinations," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 103-114.
    3. Szymon Marcińczak & Iwona Sagan, 2011. "The Socio-spatial Restructuring of Šódź, Poland," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(9), pages 1789-1809, July.
    4. Ratka ÄŒolić & Ä orÄ‘e Milić & Jasna Petrić & NataÅ¡a ÄŒolić, 2022. "Institutional capacity development within the national urban policy formation process – Participants’ views," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(1), pages 69-89, February.
    5. Dorota Mantey, 2021. "Objective and Subjective Determinants of Neighborhood Satisfaction in the Context of Retrofitting Suburbs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Perić Ana, 2016. "Institutional Cooperation in the Brownfield Regeneration Process: Experiences from Central and Eastern European Countries," European Spatial Research and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 23(1), pages 21-46, June.
    7. Ksenija Lalović & Jelena Živković & Uroš Radosavljević & Zoran Đukanović, 2019. "An Integral Approach to the Modeling of Information Support for Local Sustainable Development—Experiences of a Serbian Enabling Leadership Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, May.
    8. Luděk Sýkora, 2009. "New Socio‐Spatial Formations: Places Of Residential Segregation And Separation In Czechia," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 100(4), pages 417-435, September.
    9. Xiao, Huijuan & Duan, Zhiyuan & Zhou, Ya & Zhang, Ning & Shan, Yuli & Lin, Xiyan & Liu, Guosheng, 2019. "CO2 emission patterns in shrinking and growing cities: A case study of Northeast China and the Yangtze River Delta," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Peter Matthews & Christopher Poyner, 2019. "The experience of living in deprived neighbourhoods for LGBT+ people: Making home in difficult circumstances," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(7), pages 1499-1515, October.
    11. Matthias Bernt & Laura Colini & Daniel Förste, 2017. "Privatization, Financialization and State Restructuring in Eastern Germany: The case of Am südpark," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 555-571, July.
    12. Oleg Golubchikov & Anna Badyina & Alla Makhrova, 2014. "The Hybrid Spatialities of Transition: Capitalism, Legacy and Uneven Urban Economic Restructuring," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(4), pages 617-633, March.
    13. Johan Colding & Åsa Gren & Stephan Barthel, 2020. "The Incremental Demise of Urban Green Spaces," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-11, May.
    14. Zuzana Pucherová & Regina Mišovičová & Gabriel Bugár & Henrich Grežo, 2021. "Changes in Landscape Structure in the Municipalities of the Nitra District (Slovak Republic) Due to Expanding Suburbanization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-27, January.
    15. Dorina Pojani & Dominic Stead, 2016. "Post-rational planning and the shifting role of planning imagery," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 353-385, June.
    16. Metaxas, Theodore, 2009. "Marketing European cities in the new internationalized environment: The course of Prague after 1989," MPRA Paper 48353, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Florian W. Bartholomae & Chang Woon Nam & Alina Schoenberg, 2017. "Urban Resurgence as a Consumer City: A Case Study for Weimar in Eastern Germany," CESifo Working Paper Series 6610, CESifo.
    18. Troels Schultz Larsen & Kristian Nagel Delica, 2021. "Territorial Destigmatization In An Era Of Policy Schizophrenia," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 423-441, May.
    19. Zakharov, Konstantin & Mizgajski, Andrzej, 2024. "Socioeconomic and political settings for the land development decreasing urban green. Inside view from Moscow," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    20. Ines Grigorescu & Cristina Dumitrică & Monica Dumitrașcu & Bianca Mitrică & Costin Dumitrașcu, 2021. "Urban Development and the (Re)use of the Communist-Built Industrial and Agricultural Sites after 1990. The Showcase of Bucharest–Ilfov Development Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:48:y:2011:i:9:p:1811-1834. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.