IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/zbw/ofel18/180015.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Impact of Digital Investments on Firm's Competitiveness

In: 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disruptive Change. April 13th - 14th, 2018, Dubrovnik, Croatia

Author

Listed:
  • Volarić, Sanel

Abstract

The initial significant technological investments in business automation during 60-ies and 70-ties were very soon followed by focus of both scholars and business community in defining models that depict the influence of information and communication technological (ICT) investments on different aspects of firm’s performance. The foundations of the scholar approach in the area were set up by Porter (1985.) when he challenged established and unquestioned positive influence of ICT investments on firm’s competitiveness. He stressed that such investments are not necessarily “strategically beneficial” and may erode competitiveness of firms and industries. As well, a decade before dawn of digital revolution, alignment of ICT/digital strategy with overall strategic plans was proved to be the main driver of positive influence of ICT investments on firm’s performance and competitiveness. The fact was iteratively proved in many later papers while need of “alignment” gradually evolved in “integration” of digital strategy in firm’s comprehensive digital business strategy. Variety of models and nomological networks have been developed to define and depict the influence of investments in digital resources (IT infrastructure, HR resources, alignment with business strategy, etc.) on firm's key performance indicators. For example, Sambamurthy et al. (2003.) argue that information technology investments and capabilities influence firm performance through three significant organizational capabilities (agility, digital options, and entrepreneurial alertness) and strategic processes (capability-building, entrepreneurial action, and co-evolutionary adaptation). Mithas et al. (2011.) developed a conceptual model linking IT-enabled information management capability and firm’s performance mediated by three organizational capabilities (customer, process and performance management capabilities). These and other papers emphasize the strategic role of ICT competences that are an antecedent of successful competitive actions and financial prosperity in moderate to fast-paced business environments. The influence is mediated by developing different dimensions of agility (customer, partnering and operational agility) and competitive actions characteristics (#of competitive actions, complexity of the action repertoire). In digital era established companies will be continuously exposed to digital disruptions initiated by both start-up companies and incumbents that have already successfully passed through digital transformation process.This turbulent competitive landscape, characterized by hyper-competition, increased time-to-market pressures, regulatory changes and rapidly evolving customer demands, can mean both - either an opportunity or a threat depending on firm's capabilities to adopt the new paradigm and develop digitally enabled enterprise agility – ability to persistently detect and seize market opportunities with speed and surprise. The prerequisite for this is an efficient implementation of comprehensive digital business strategy: digital strategy fully integrated in firm’s strategic plan.

Suggested Citation

  • Volarić, Sanel, 2018. "The Impact of Digital Investments on Firm's Competitiveness," 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disruptive Change (Dubrovnik, 2018), in: 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disrupt, pages 626-640, Governance Research and Development Centre (CIRU), Zagreb.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ofel18:180015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/180015/1/ofel-2018-p626-640.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard A. D'Aveni & Giovanni Battista Dagnino & Ken G. Smith, 2010. "The age of temporary advantage," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(13), pages 1371-1385, December.
    2. Erik Brynjolfsson & Lorin M. Hitt, 2003. "Computing Productivity: Firm-Level Evidence," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 85(4), pages 793-808, November.
    3. Zahra, Shaker A., 1993. "Environment, corporate entrepreneurship, and financial performance: A taxonomic approach," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 319-340, July.
    4. R. Duane Ireland & Jeffrey G. Covin & Donald F. Kuratko, 2009. "Conceptualizing Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(1), pages 19-46, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. UMRANI Waheed Ali & MAHMOOD Rosli & AHMED Umair, 2016. "Unveiling The Direct Effect Of Corporate Entrepreneurship’S Dimensions On The Business Performance: A Case Of Big Five Banks In Pakistan," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 11(1), pages 181-195, April.
    2. Turró, Andreu & Urbano, David & Peris-Ortiz, Marta, 2014. "Culture and innovation: The moderating effect of cultural values on corporate entrepreneurship," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 360-369.
    3. Esthela Galván-Vela & Eduardo Arango Herrera & Deisy Milena Sorzano Rodríguez & Rafael Ravina-Ripoll, 2021. "State-of-the-Art Analysis of Intrapreneurship: A Review of the Theoretical Construct and Its Bibliometrics," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Encarnacion García-Sánchez & Víctor Jesús García-Morales & Rodrigo Martín-Rojas, 2018. "Analysis of the influence of the environment, stakeholder integration capability, absorptive capacity, and technological skills on organizational performance through corporate entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 345-377, June.
    5. Johan Bruneel & Els Van de Velde & Bart Clarysse, 2013. "Impact of the Type of Corporate Spin–Off on Growth," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 37(4), pages 943-959, July.
    6. Olufemi Muibi Omisakin & Camille Nakhid & Romie Littrell & Jane Verbitsky, 2016. "Entrepreneurial Orientation among Migrants and Small and Medium Enterprises," Journal of Business Administration Research, Journal of Business Administration Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(1), pages 7-22, April.
    7. Cardona Montoya, Raúl Armando & Martins, Izaias & Velásquez Ceballos, Hermilson, 2017. "Entrepreneurial orientation, assessment and management of projects and impact in corporate entrepreneurship: intention to action," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    8. Byungjoo Paek & Heesang Lee, 2018. "Strategic entrepreneurship and competitive advantage of established firms: evidence from the digital TV industry," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 883-925, December.
    9. Edwards, John & Miles, Morgan P. & D'Alessandro, Steven & Frost, Mark, 2023. "Entrepreneurial strategy-making, corporate entrepreneurship preparedness and entrepreneurial sales actions: Improving B2B sales performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    10. D Hugh Whittaker & Benjamin Fath & Antje Fiedler, 2020. "Open to competition? Competitive density and the growth of young New Zealand ventures," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(2), pages 343-358, May.
    11. Bo Young Shin & Keun Tae Cho, 2020. "The Evolutionary Model of Corporate Entrepreneurship: A Case Study of Samsung Creative-Lab," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-23, October.
    12. Wu Zhao & Wei Liu & Yun Chen, 2019. "Internal Fission Strategies in Corporate Entrepreneurship: A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-20, September.
    13. Lennart Burger & Ivana Blažková, 2020. "Internal Determinants Promoting Corporate Entrepreneurship in Established Organizations: A Systematic Literature Review," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2020(2), pages 19-45.
    14. Jeanette Engzell, 2023. "Beyond the stereotype of an intrapreneur: an exploratory study of different intrapreneurs and various corporate conditions," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(8), pages 1-24, August.
    15. Milovanović Bojan Morić & Bubaš Zoran & Mikić Mihaela, 2021. "Entrepreneurial Orientation, Strategic Networking, and Croatian SMEs Performance: A Configurational Approach," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 236-252, December.
    16. David Urbano & Andreu Turro & Mike Wright & Shaker Zahra, 2022. "Corporate entrepreneurship: a systematic literature review and future research agenda," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 1541-1565, December.
    17. Antonio Rodríguez-Peña, 2021. "Assessing the impact of corporate entrepreneurship in the financial performance of subsidiaries of Colombian business groups: under environmental dynamism moderation," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-27, December.
    18. Neill, Stern & York, Jonathan L., 2012. "The entrepreneurial perceptions of strategy makers: Constructing an exploratory path in the pursuit of radical growth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(7), pages 1003-1009.
    19. Rosli Mahmood & Rosni Abdul Wahid, 2012. "Applying Corporate Entrepreneurship To Bank Performance In Malaysia," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship, Global Research Agency, vol. 3(1), pages 68-82, July.
    20. Abebe, Michael A. & Angriawan, Arifin, 2014. "Organizational and competitive influences of exploration and exploitation activities in small firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 339-345.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ofel18:180015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ciru.hr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.