IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/zbw/hiclch/209199.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Planning Approach for Robust Manufacturing Footprint Decisions

In: Next Generation Supply Chains: Trends and Opportunities. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), Vol. 18

Author

Listed:
  • Sprenger, Philipp
  • Parlings, Matthias
  • Hegmanns, Tobias

Abstract

The manufacturing footprint strategy of European automotive companies has been determined in the preceding decades by a reduction of labour and operational costs and the development of new markets. Today, the automotive sector is characterised by growing number of logistic-related requirements like customisation, just-in-sequence supply and assembly of vendor parts (FAST 2025, 2013). This leads to the development of footprint planning as a multidimensional and complex decision problem with a significant impact on the competitiveness and finances of the business (Häntsch and Huchzermeier, 2013; Farahani et al., 2013). In response to this challenge, a literature review of footprint planning and facility selection methods and models for designing supply chain networks will be presented. The comparison of existing approaches shows the necessity of new models that allow robust and adaptable footprint decisions while especially considering project and market-related uncertainties. These uncertainties demonstrate the need to revise the footprint strategy continuously. Derived from the state-of-the-art analysis, a holistic planning work flow that supports decision makers in automotive industries from a supply chain design perspective with a special focus on the uncertainty of future business opportunities is presented. This approach integrates qualitative planning modules for knock-out-analyses and use-value-analyses and integrates quantitative modules (e.g. Monte Carlo simulation) for future project allocation. This planning procedure adopts a project-driven approach and allows for a multidimensional evaluation of different footprint scenarios, based on an uncertain future project and contract situation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sprenger, Philipp & Parlings, Matthias & Hegmanns, Tobias, 2014. "Planning Approach for Robust Manufacturing Footprint Decisions," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Next Generation Supply Chains: Trends and Opportunities. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), Vol. 18, volume 18, pages 29-50, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hiclch:209199
    DOI: 10.15480/882.1188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/209199/1/hicl-2014-18-029.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15480/882.1188?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sabri, Ehap H. & Beamon, Benita M., 2000. "A multi-objective approach to simultaneous strategic and operational planning in supply chain design," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 581-598, October.
    2. Mark Goetschalckx & Bernhard Fleischmann, 2005. "Strategic Network Planning," Springer Books, in: Hartmut Stadtler & Christoph Kilger (ed.), Supply Chain Management and Advanced Planning, edition 0, chapter 6, pages 117-137, Springer.
    3. Owen, Susan Hesse & Daskin, Mark S., 1998. "Strategic facility location: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(3), pages 423-447, December.
    4. Melo, M.T. & Nickel, S. & Saldanha-da-Gama, F., 2009. "Facility location and supply chain management - A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 401-412, July.
    5. Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Rezapour, Shabnam & Drezner, Tammy & Fallah, Samira, 2014. "Competitive supply chain network design: An overview of classifications, models, solution techniques and applications," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 92-118.
    6. Mark S. Daskin & Lawrence V. Snyder & Rosemary T. Berger, 2005. "Facility Location in Supply Chain Design," Springer Books, in: André Langevin & Diane Riopel (ed.), Logistics Systems: Design and Optimization, chapter 0, pages 39-65, Springer.
    7. Klibi, Walid & Martel, Alain & Guitouni, Adel, 2010. "The design of robust value-creating supply chain networks: A critical review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 283-293, June.
    8. John M. Mulvey & Robert J. Vanderbei & Stavros A. Zenios, 1995. "Robust Optimization of Large-Scale Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 264-281, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sivakumaran, Thillai & Sprenger, Philipp & Toth, Michael & Henke, Michael, 2015. "Market Barrier Integrated Approach for Manufacturing Footprint Decision Support," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Sustainability in Logistics and Supply Chain Management: New Designs and Strategies. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics , volume 21, pages 121-151, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gilani, Hani & Sahebi, Hadi, 2022. "A data-driven robust optimization model by cutting hyperplanes on vaccine access uncertainty in COVID-19 vaccine supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    2. Li, Lei & Manier, Hervé & Manier, Marie-Ange, 2019. "Hydrogen supply chain network design: An optimization-oriented review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 342-360.
    3. Walther, Grit & Schatka, Anne & Spengler, Thomas S., 2012. "Design of regional production networks for second generation synthetic bio-fuel – A case study in Northern Germany," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 280-292.
    4. Van Engeland, Jens & Beliën, Jeroen & De Boeck, Liesje & De Jaeger, Simon, 2020. "Literature review: Strategic network optimization models in waste reverse supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Jimenez, Charlotte & Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & Feuillebois, Christian & Pauly, Eric, 2013. "Optimizing the positioning and technological choices of RFID elements for aircraft part identification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(2), pages 350-357.
    6. Sahling, Florian & Kayser, Ariane, 2016. "Strategic supply network planning with vendor selection under consideration of risk and demand uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 201-214.
    7. Snoeck, André & Udenio, Maximiliano & Fransoo, Jan C., 2019. "A stochastic program to evaluate disruption mitigation investments in the supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 516-530.
    8. Joy Chang & Miao Yu & Siqian Shen & Ming Xu, 2017. "Location Design and Relocation of a Mixed Car-Sharing Fleet with a CO 2 Emission Constraint," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 205-218, September.
    9. Bairamzadeh, Samira & Saidi-Mehrabad, Mohammad & Pishvaee, Mir Saman, 2018. "Modelling different types of uncertainty in biofuel supply network design and planning: A robust optimization approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 500-517.
    10. Guazzelli, Cauê Sauter & Cunha, Claudio B., 2018. "Exploring K-best solutions to enrich network design decision-making," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 139-164.
    11. Mallidis, Ioannis & Dekker, Rommert & Vlachos, Dimitrios, 2012. "The impact of greening on supply chain design and cost: a case for a developing region," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 118-128.
    12. M. Tadaros & A. Migdalas & B. Samuelsson & A. Segerstedt, 2022. "Location of facilities and network design for reverse logistics of lithium-ion batteries in Sweden," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 895-915, April.
    13. Tordecilla-Madera, Rafael & Polo, Andrés & Muñoz, Dairo & González-Rodríguez, Leonardo, 2017. "A robust design for a Colombian dairy cooperative's milk storage and refrigeration logistics system using binary programming," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PC), pages 710-720.
    14. Mallidis, I. & Dekker, R. & Vlachos, D., 2010. "Greening Supply Chains: Impact on Cost and Design," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2010-39b, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    15. Klibi, Walid & Martel, Alain & Guitouni, Adel, 2016. "The impact of operations anticipations on the quality of stochastic location-allocation models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 19-33.
    16. Salehi Sadghiani, N. & Torabi, S.A. & Sahebjamnia, N., 2015. "Retail supply chain network design under operational and disruption risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 95-114.
    17. Ouhimmou, Mustapha & Nourelfath, Mustapha & Bouchard, Mathieu & Bricha, Naji, 2019. "Design of robust distribution network under demand uncertainty: A case study in the pulp and paper," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 96-105.
    18. Jordi Pereira & Mariona Vilà, 2016. "A new model for supply chain network design with integrated assembly line balancing decisions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(9), pages 2653-2669, May.
    19. Behzadi, Golnar & O’Sullivan, Michael Justin & Olsen, Tava Lennon & Zhang, Abraham, 2018. "Agribusiness supply chain risk management: A review of quantitative decision models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 21-42.
    20. Melo, M.T. & Nickel, S. & Saldanha-da-Gama, F., 2009. "Facility location and supply chain management - A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 401-412, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hiclch:209199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hicl.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.